What would be the magnesium & calcium hardness, and alkalinity of Crystal Geyser Norman AK
The Norman Arkansas sourced Crystal Geyser is what is sold in my area. Here is a report on it: https://www.crystalgeyserplease.com/wp- ... REPORT.pdf
It states Alkalinity 86 mg/L
Is that the same as the alkalinity people measure for water used brewing coffee, or something different?
It states Hardness, Calcium is 90 mg/L and Total Hardness is 95 mg/L
So I assume general hardness is 95 mg/L at 90 mg/L calcium and 5 mg/L magnesium.
Is that correct? If not, what would those values be?
So the profile, as I read it is:
Alkalinity 86 mg/L and general hardness 95 mg/L , so cutting it with distilled water 50/50, would half those numbers to Alkalinity 43 mg/L and Hardness 47.5 mg/L
It states Alkalinity 86 mg/L
Is that the same as the alkalinity people measure for water used brewing coffee, or something different?
It states Hardness, Calcium is 90 mg/L and Total Hardness is 95 mg/L
So I assume general hardness is 95 mg/L at 90 mg/L calcium and 5 mg/L magnesium.
Is that correct? If not, what would those values be?
So the profile, as I read it is:
Alkalinity 86 mg/L and general hardness 95 mg/L , so cutting it with distilled water 50/50, would half those numbers to Alkalinity 43 mg/L and Hardness 47.5 mg/L
If my read of that report is right and it is 95 mg/L general hardness and 86 mg/L alkalinity, and almost all the general hardness is calcium, I could add an amount of Epsom salt that would add 55 mg/L hardness, then hardness would be 140 mg/L almost roughly 65/35 calcium to magnesium, and alkalinity stay at 86 mg/L. Then if I cut it 50/50 with distilled water, it would cut that profile in half to roughly 40 mg/L alkalinity and 70 mg/L hardness for an ideal target without as much work as adding 3 chemicals to distilled.
Are my read of that report and planning right?
Are my read of that report and planning right?
- homeburrero
- Team HB
Yes. The terms, alkalinity, total alkalinity, and M-alkalinity all refer to the same thing in a water report, as well in water for coffee discussions. It is a measure of acid buffering capacity, and in this case is quantified in mg/L CaCO3 equivalents.Acavia wrote:It states Alkalinity 86 mg/L
Is that the same as the alkalinity people measure for water used brewing coffee, or something different?
Exactly right. These are also quantified in mg/L CaCO3 equivalents.Acavia wrote:It states Hardness, Calcium is 90 mg/L and Total Hardness is 95 mg/L
So I assume general hardness is 95 mg/L at 90 mg/L calcium and 5 mg/L magnesium.
Is that correct?
Correct.Acavia wrote:Alkalinity 86 mg/L and general hardness 95 mg/L , so cutting it with distilled water 50/50, would half those numbers to Alkalinity 43 mg/L and Hardness 47.5 mg/L
Roughly yes. (More precisely it would be calcium hardness 90 mg/L, magnesium hardness 60 mg/L, total hardness 150 mg/L, and the ratio of calcium/magnesium hardness 60/40. Then after cutting it 50:50 you would have calcium hardness 45 mg/L, total hardness 75 mg/L, alkalinity 43 mg/L, and of course same ratio of 60/40.)Acavia wrote:If my read of that report is right and it is 95 mg/L general hardness and 86 mg/L alkalinity, and almost all the general hardness is calcium, I could add an amount of Epsom salt that would add 55 mg/L hardness, then hardness would be 140 mg/L almost roughly 65/35 calcium to magnesium, and alkalinity stay at 86 mg/L. Then if I cut it 50/50 with distilled water, it would cut that profile in half to roughly 40 mg/L alkalinity and 70 mg/L hardness for an ideal target without as much work as adding 3 chemicals to distilled.
Are my read of that report and planning right?
Pat
nínádiishʼnahgo gohwééh náshdlį́į́h
nínádiishʼnahgo gohwééh náshdlį́į́h
Thankshomeburrero wrote:Yes. The terms, alkalinity, total alkalinity, and M-alkalinity all refer to the same thing in a water report, as well in water for coffee discussions. It is a measure of acid buffering capacity, and in this case is quantified in mg/L CaCO3 equivalents.
Exactly right. These are also quantified in mg/L CaCO3 equivalents.
Correct.
Roughly yes. (More precisely it would be calcium hardness 90 mg/L, magnesium hardness 60 mg/L, total hardness 150 mg/L, and the ratio of calcium/magnesium hardness 60/40. Then after cutting it 50:50 you would have calcium hardness 45 mg/L, total hardness 75 mg/L, alkalinity 43 mg/L, and of course same ratio of 60/40.)