Using Eric's Grouphead Thermometer

Beginner and pro baristas share tips and tricks for making espresso.
WSH
Posts: 291
Joined: 12 years ago

#1: Post by WSH »

Hey Eric!

A few questions I can't seem to find in the archives. Is the temperature we're seeing with your thermometer the actual brew temperature or is it somewhat less with the group head soaking up some of the water temp before it hits the puck? I suppose there is some heat loss, maybe a few degress?

Typically right now, 2 days into using it, it seems that there is a spike in temp in the neighborhood of 10 df for me(Bezzera Unica SBDU) from idle when brewing, at least most of the time. Sometimes a little less.

PID is set for 91c (196f), group idles around 197f and I see a spike up to 208f while brewing after a long idle. Back to back shots, within a few minutes of one another, brings the peak temp down considerably to around 200-201 while brewing.

Any thoughts?

Edited: I now see "we" just went through this very subject in Temperature Differential between Eric's Thermometer and Brew Temperature with Madrooter. Most of the information seems to pertain to HX machines and flushing though.

jonr
Posts: 610
Joined: 11 years ago

#2: Post by jonr »

I don't know about that thermometer (I recommend in-basket measurement), but more generically, just like with a HX, if you want a lower brew temp, either lower the boiler temp or flush. Which one depends on how you want to effect the temperature profile.

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22030
Joined: 19 years ago

#3: Post by HB »

WSH wrote:Is the temperature we're seeing with your thermometer the actual brew temperature or is it somewhat less with the group head soaking up some of the water temp before it hits the puck? I suppose there is some heat loss, maybe a few degrees?
Eric surely has lots of graphs capturing the details, but generally speaking, the thermocouple adapter (or thermometer adapter) lags the actual temperature by a few degrees. The two merge around the 20 second mark. The readout before that point varies, depending on the particulars of the espresso machine (e.g., heat exchangers start high and end low, double boilers start lower and end higher).
Dan Kehn

WSH (original poster)
Posts: 291
Joined: 12 years ago

#4: Post by WSH (original poster) »

jonr wrote:I don't know about that thermometer (I recommend in-basket measurement), but more generically, just like with a HX, if you want a lower brew temp, either lower the boiler temp or flush. Which one depends on how you want to effect the temperature profile.
Good points. I guess, naively, I thought because it's a single boiler with a PID that I would have rock solid brewing temperatures. Wrong! I suppose the size of the boiler is the main reason, it's only .5 liter, why I'm seeing the variation I am. Which is really not a bad thing, now that I know it and can control it with HX like flushing.

jonr
Posts: 610
Joined: 11 years ago

#5: Post by jonr »

I suppose the size of the boiler is the main reason, it's only .5 liter, why I'm seeing the variation I am.
That's a good size to give you a proper temperature decline during brew (although it also depends on how the controller behaves, smaller can work well also). But you have a lot of metal exposed to ambient temperatures - you need to compensate for this.

WSH (original poster)
Posts: 291
Joined: 12 years ago

#6: Post by WSH (original poster) »

I'm still somewhat unsure of what the difference in temperature is between what I see on the thermometer and then what temperature is actually making it to the puck.

User avatar
erics
Supporter ★
Posts: 6302
Joined: 19 years ago

#7: Post by erics »

While this is, obviously, not your machine, the results should be close. The boiler size for this PARTICULAR VBM is 0.75 litres.



A grouphead temperature of 197 F is close to ideal. I would do a very short screen flush and brew immediately.
Skål,

Eric S.
http://users.rcn.com/erics/
E-mail: erics at rcn dot com

WSH (original poster)
Posts: 291
Joined: 12 years ago

#8: Post by WSH (original poster) »

A grouphead temperature of 197 F is close to ideal. I would do a very short screen flush and brew immediately.
1. Ok then, if 197 F is "close", what is the "ideal" idle grouphead temperature?

2. Why the short screen flush, then brew?

jonr
Posts: 610
Joined: 11 years ago

#9: Post by jonr »

You need to specify exactly what brew basket temperature profile you want. And probably buy a brew basket temperature probe to verify that you are getting it (or close, you have limited controls).

A flush should bump up the early brew temperatures (vs the depression seen until 7 seconds above).

User avatar
erics
Supporter ★
Posts: 6302
Joined: 19 years ago

#10: Post by erics »

Why the short screen flush, then brew?
Because it is my belief that most neglect to do a short screen flush after brewing which is most proper. If you happen to operate counter to my belief, then a grouphead temperature reading of 197 F should produce a tasty shot. Varied beans/bean blends react differently to temperatures and it is best to try a particular bean at, say, +3 and -3 degrees to see if you can discern a difference.
Skål,

Eric S.
http://users.rcn.com/erics/
E-mail: erics at rcn dot com

Post Reply