networkcrasher wrote:Err, thanks Jim. I think I mistyped and meant 87. I know it doesn't do temp, which was a good reason for me to go to the 287 for its temp and logging capabilities.

I was referring to your new meter when I said I thought it would work well. If you'd like to send it my way for a few months, I could be absolutely certain.

Jim

Haha, that makes more sense. I went back and re-read the post and must have been on a caffeine high when I first replied. Either that or my comprehensive skills are seriously lacking.

It's probably the latter.