Versalab M3 Grinder - Page 12

Behind the scenes of the site's projects and equipment reviews.
User avatar
Teme
Posts: 342
Joined: 19 years ago

#111: Post by Teme »

Abe Carmeli wrote:I've been working with the new upgraded locking knob for a few weeks now. Just as a reminder, the upgraded part assembly which includes a knob lock, two screws, a break and a washer were designed to address the problem of inconsistent dial stop. As far as I can tell, the new upgraded parts resolve that problem. It took me two tries in adjusting the mechanism to work properly, but it is doing a much better job than the original in my case.
Good to hear that this weakness has been fixed.
Abe Carmeli wrote:This is just a short note on maintenance. Weekly, remove the drive belt and clean it and the pulleys with alcohol - isopropyl would be best. It is a very simple procedure and takes 3 minutes including cleaning. Yesterday I noticed the effect of foregoing the cleaning. Dust is collected on the pulleys, and the belt starts slipping instead of moving the large pulley, though the engine is running. The grinder will stop grinding and you will hear a squeaking sound. One sweep around the pulleys and the belt cleaned it up for me.
Hmm... I guess a few minutes weekly is not too bad. I assume that the belt is one of the shorter lived components of the grinder and needs to be replaced at certain intervals...

I must say that the M3 looks interesting and the grind quality / distribution characteristics very appealing. Thank you for sharing your experiences! The price (currently at $1250) it a bit less appealing but being a low volume product, it is understandable. I look forwrd to a wrap-up / conclusions on the M3. I do have a couple of things that I am wondering about

1) Versalab says that the M3 is suitable also for smaller filter baskets. I am thinking lever here and e.g. a 49mm basket from an Olympia Cremina or Elektra Microcasa a Leva would fit snugly within the plastic "O" ring on the bottom funnel (the inner diameter is 50mm and with the 49 mm basket in the portafilter handle, there should be a tight seal) while the 58mm commercial portafilters are a snug fit to the outside of the said "O" ring. Any views on this?
2) Moving from one grind setting to another - how difficult is this? Let's say I had an M3 and used the grinder for two machines. One would be a lever for which I grind slightly finer than for the E61 HX vibe pump machine. With the grind adjustment scale and the upgraded locking knob moving between these two settings should be repeatable, right? But I assume that potentially it would require quite a few turns on the adjustment knob due to the extended adjustment range of the M3?

Br,
Teme

Advertisement
User avatar
luthier
Posts: 13
Joined: 19 years ago

#112: Post by luthier »

Teme wrote: 1) Versalab says that the M3 is suitable also for smaller filter baskets. I am thinking lever here and e.g. a 49mm basket from an Olympia Cremina or Elektra Microcasa a Leva would fit snugly within the plastic "O" ring on the bottom funnel (the inner diameter is 50mm and with the 49 mm basket in the portafilter handle, there should be a tight seal) while the 58mm commercial portafilters are a snug fit to the outside of the said "O" ring. Any views on this?
My millennium europiccola has 51~51.5mm baskets and it's probably the smallest suitable basket size for the M3 grinder.
Teme wrote: 2) Moving from one grind setting to another - how difficult is this? Let's say I had an M3 and used the grinder for two machines. One would be a lever for which I grind slightly finer than for the E61 HX vibe pump machine. With the grind adjustment scale and the upgraded locking knob moving between these two settings should be repeatable, right? But I assume that potentially it would require quite a few turns on the adjustment knob due to the extended adjustment range of the M3?
I adjust the grind all the time. I think it's quite repeatable even before upgrading the lock knob. As for the upgrading kit, I had to file the underside of the break a little more to make it work properly.
You've been perfecting your technique for a long time...... So have I.

Abe Carmeli (original poster)
Team HB
Posts: 845
Joined: 19 years ago

#113: Post by Abe Carmeli (original poster) »

Teme wrote:
1) Versalab says that the M3 is suitable also for smaller filter baskets. I am thinking lever here and e.g. a 49mm basket from an Olympia Cremina or Elektra Microcasa a Leva would fit snugly within the plastic "O" ring on the bottom funnel (the inner diameter is 50mm and with the 49 mm basket in the portafilter handle, there should be a tight seal) while the 58mm commercial portafilters are a snug fit to the outside of the said "O" ring. Any views on this?
I think it will fit. I used it with a ~ 51 mm basket for my La Pavoni and it works. Luthier is right to voice some caution, since a 49 mm basket is slightly smaller. But I think you should be OK since the basket rim is wider than 49 mm. At most, you may have a little more ground coffee at the rim than a 58mm would. To be absolutely sure, if you feel like shipping one to me I'll test it for you.
2) Moving from one grind setting to another - how difficult is this? Let's say I had an M3 and used the grinder for two machines. One would be a lever for which I grind slightly finer than for the E61 HX vibe pump machine. With the grind adjustment scale and the upgraded locking knob moving between these two settings should be repeatable, right? But I assume that potentially it would require quite a few turns on the adjustment knob due to the extended adjustment range of the M3?
You should not have a dial stop consistency problem with the new knob. As to the dial difference between a 58 mm vibe and a 49 mm lever, it is not a few turns of the dial, but just a few stops difference. Jim should be able to answer it more accurately. Jim, what's your La Peppina basket size?
Abe Carmeli

User avatar
another_jim
Team HB
Posts: 13871
Joined: 19 years ago

#114: Post by another_jim »

The 49 baskets are iffy. The go up against the brass on the inside of the plastic collar and can get hit by the moving scraper. This can be cured by clipping off a small amount at the bottom of the scraper (John Bicht's idea). The remaining difficulty is that there's a far greater tendency for the grounds to spill out from the sides when you take the basket off. So using the tiny basket is a little too delicate for my klutzy ways. I ended up using an old solis 53mm basket, putting the Peppi basket over it (upside down) and flipping. This is fast and no mess.

Abe Carmeli (original poster)
Team HB
Posts: 845
Joined: 19 years ago

#115: Post by Abe Carmeli (original poster) »

Adjusting Burr Speed on the Versalab M3 Grinder

Here is an interesting variable I've never been able to play with: Adjusting burr speed. I believe the M3 has a stock burr speed of 500 rpm. However this can be adjusted downward (to a slower speed) by adjusting a little screw on a circuit board inside the grinder. To access it, you need to disassemble the grinder's back panel (4 screws). Inside, you will find a blue chip on the circuit board. That blue thingy has a small brass screw on top of it. Turning the screw counterclockwise, reduces burr speed. I turned it 2 turns and noticed a visible change in burr speed. It is hard to tell what the speed is, but it is definitely slower. John Bicht believes that slower speed has a positive influence on the cup and is detectable. My guesstimate is that I reduced it to around 350-400 RPM with those two turns. I will spend a couple of weeks on it and see if indeed there is a detectable difference.

Image
The little brass screw on top of the blue thingy on the bottom circuit board adjusts burr speed.
Abe Carmeli

mathias
Posts: 48
Joined: 19 years ago

#116: Post by mathias »

First of all, many thanks for the information given in this thread.

Any chance of photos of the motor? According to Versalab's homepage the grinder requires 1A, 120V. Does that mean it draws less than 120W?

What is the rpm of the motor? If not specified could someone measure the two wheel diameters?

From the photos in the thread I see no other means of transfer the energy from the burr axis to the burrs than friction. Is that correct? Then how hard does the screw at the end of the burr axis need to be tightened?

Regarding the wiper that needs to be repositioned after each dismantle. Wouldn't it be possible to redesign it a little and have a separate made threaded hole off center (on the conical surface of the burr carrier) for it? Then it could stay together with the lower burr carrier when dismantling the burr set.

User avatar
Teme
Posts: 342
Joined: 19 years ago

#117: Post by Teme »

Abe and Jim,

I applaud the great job you have done in testing the Versalab grinder. As for some background on my interest towards this grinder, I have received a "threat" from those close to me that they will actually buy me a new grinder for a Christmas present (or at least take part in the cost) as long as they know what I want. So, I will be upgrading from my current Mazzer Mini to either a MiniE or the Versalab...

Upon reading this thread I am convinced of the superiority of the Versalab in many areas but I'm not too sure about its suitability / practicality in terms of everyday use. My specific questions relate to these items in particular:

- pulley / belt slippage and squeaking issue - how bad is this? can one live with it?
- lack of hopper - is the grind result sensitive to how one pours the beans in?
- popcorning - there is no hopper so can one assume some popcorning will occur or are all the beans really "sucked" into the grinder as indicated in the thread
- messiness / cleanliness? is there a lot to clean up after use vs e.g. a Mini
- multiple consecutive shots - how does it fare against a Mazzer in terms of the procedure and time consumed?

I would naturally also be very interested in hearing any pros or cons that are not apparent from the thread as of yet - can there be any after such an exhaustive report? ;-)

Br,
Teme

Advertisement
papalatte
Posts: 29
Joined: 19 years ago

#118: Post by papalatte »

I second the motion....... :wink:

Abe Carmeli (original poster)
Team HB
Posts: 845
Joined: 19 years ago

#119: Post by Abe Carmeli (original poster) »

Teme wrote:pulley / belt slippage and squeaking issue - how bad is this? can one live with it?
I recommend a weekly cleaning routine of the pulley & belt. It takes three minutes. If you do it, there shouldn't be any slippage in normal use. However, you cannot overload that grinder with beans or you are likely to choke it. That was my initial problem. I loaded it to the top with beans and then ran it. The proper way is to turn it on and feed it with beans. I do it in two servings for 18 grams of coffee.
- lack of hopper - is the grind result sensitive to how one pours the beans in?
Yes, see above.
- popcorning - there is no hopper so can one assume some popcorning will occur or are all the beans really "sucked" into the grinder as indicated in the thread
I do not think that popcorn is an issue with the grinder, though I have no way to confirm it other than tasting it in the cup.
- messiness / cleanliness? is there a lot to clean up after use vs e.g. a Mini
I use the Mini grinder tray for the M3 grinder (I cut the two clips that attach it to the Mini). It works well to prevent a messy surface. There is less to clean up because you are not dealing with sweeping a doser clean after a grind session. It takes me about 15 seconds to cleanup after a grind.
- multiple consecutive shots - how does it fare against a Mazzer in terms of the procedure and time consumed?
Here the Mazzer is faster and more convenient. It takes ~ 20 seconds to grind for a shot. The Mazzer will grind enough coffee for 2 shots at that time frame, and you don't need to attend to it as it grinds.
I would naturally also be very interested in hearing any pros or cons that are not apparent from the thread as of yet - can there be any after such an exhaustive report? ;-)
Let me try to sum it up in a nutshell:

Pros

1) Near perfect distribution
2) No clumps
3) Better grind quality, resulting in overall better quality in the cup, particularly with high growth acidic coffees.
4) Minimal amount of stale coffee caught in the grinder burrs & housing
5) Practically no coffee is caught in the funnel
6) Esthetically outstanding & unique

Cons

1) No dial scale, though one can fabricate a half ass scale, with hilarious consequences. I'm working on putting together a laser etched scale. (with help from Sean Lennon & Lino). If we are successful, I hope to make it available to all who request it.
2) Takes longer to grind
3) May be too slow & inconvenient when entertaining a party
4) Requires the Barista to attend to the grinder as it grinds
5) Prone to stall if it is not fed properly
6) Requires slightly more time to maintain the grinder - weekly pulley cleanup
Abe Carmeli

User avatar
AndyS
Posts: 1053
Joined: 19 years ago

#120: Post by AndyS »

mathias wrote:Any chance of photos of the motor? According to Versalab's homepage the grinder requires 1A, 120V. Does that mean it draws less than 120W?

What is the rpm of the motor? If not specified could someone measure the two wheel diameters?
http://tinyurl.com/dvgsq
-AndyS
VST refractometer/filter basket beta tester, no financial interest in the company