Comments on Decent Espresso DE1+ Review - Page 7

Behind the scenes of the site's upcoming equipment reviews.
oly_puller

#61: Post by oly_puller » Nov 10, 2019, 12:46 pm

Hi All - I don't want to derail the thread, but I am considering a Decent machine pretty seriously and I'm confused by the last few posts about mouth-feel not being on par with other machines. How is it that with the same beans/grind/water and the ability to adjust *all* the parameters of the extraction there's still something that effects mouth feel that can't be accounted for? If a Decent owner could chime in on their experience - I'm all ears. Also - I'm curious - for those that didn't get the Pro model, are you concerned about the warranty - it's the only difference I see between the + and the pro. Am I wrong on that? I run a crimina67 and am accustomed to bullet-proof machine...
...better make it a double!
LMWDP #030

RyanP

#62: Post by RyanP » replying to oly_puller » Nov 10, 2019, 1:28 pm

It's definitely not bulletproof but there's no doubt in my mind that John and his team will get you sorted out if you run into any issues. Anybody who is on the basecamp forum would agree they are heavily invested in the success of the machine and satisfaction of their customers.

User avatar
NelisB

#63: Post by NelisB » Nov 10, 2019, 1:51 pm

peacecup wrote:Isn't that one of the main reasons why lever machines are still so popular? At least I've always thought that.
I think that continuous pressure and flow are important for mouthfeel and body. Spring levers do this right.

oly_puller

#64: Post by oly_puller » replying to NelisB » Nov 10, 2019, 8:39 pm

But with the Decent - can't you manage that? I'm still confused how a certain machine can produce mouth-feel where another wouldn't with the same variables controlled. Water/Beans/Grind/Extraction - what am I missing?
...better make it a double!
LMWDP #030

r7

#65: Post by r7 » Nov 10, 2019, 9:49 pm

I have been using a Decent for the past 16 months. It is a delight to use. Some users have experimented with changes in headspace to affect mouthfeel. I haven't felt any need or desire to experiment along those lines. Apparently reducing headspace seems to increase mouthfeel...

User avatar
NelisB

#66: Post by NelisB » Yesterday, 6:52 am

oly_puller wrote:But with the Decent - can't you manage that? I'm still confused how a certain machine can produce mouth-feel where another wouldn't with the same variables controlled. Water/Beans/Grind/Extraction - what am I missing?
The pump of the DE is pulsing, so pressure and flow are not smooth and continuous. KvdW uses springs as shock absorbers in his PPIC and IM to smoothen out pressure and flow. KvdW delivers premium body and mouthfeel.

User avatar
luca
Team HB

#67: Post by luca » Yesterday, 8:03 am

oly_puller wrote:But with the Decent - can't you manage that? I'm still confused how a certain machine can produce mouth-feel where another wouldn't with the same variables controlled. Water/Beans/Grind/Extraction - what am I missing?
The effect of the headspace between the shower screen and the puck. Or possibly between the dispersion block and the puck. What is this effect? I don't think anyone really knows. But the addition of a spacer certainly seems to require the use of a coarser grind.

But it would be interesting to run this experiment in reverse, too. What happens if you take a regular machine like any e61 box or a spaziale, since a few people seem to have one of them, and raise the shower screen? Well, we can't do that. But we could take a very deep basket and dose less in it and see what happens. The result will be confounded by the different basket hole size, but we might learn something. Really, we would need to build a rig with, say, a regular basket with an extra, say, 4-7mm of depth added to it. I'm sure someone cleverer than me could figure it out. Or maybe we could get a basket manufacturer to do it.
LMWDP #034 | 2011: Q Grader Exam, Brewer's Cup #3, Australian Cup Tasting #1
★ Helpful