Cafelat Robot User Experience - Page 486
I enjoy the shots I get from it. Workflow, build and feel is inferior in my opinion. Less physical effort below 6 bar but weirdly more demanding with higher pressures, especially if the flow is low.
Even though I'm mostly seeing downsides with Flair 58 it still makes sense for someone who mostly drinks 1:2-1:3 light roast, low pressure espresso. A bottom paper filter and full pre-heat will get me close with the Robot, but I believe the chamfered basket is the limiting factor. It makes pulling shots forgiving, also with light roasts, but pushing for really high extractions without resorting to allongé is difficult.
It's a trend with both the Flair Classic and Flair 58: easier to reach high extractions but somewhat annoying to use. For medium to dark roasts I much prefer the Robot.. But the Flair is greedy for counter space and it's already in position.. while my Robot never needed a permanent place. Unless I can get a different basket for it I'm afraid it might sit on a shelf more and more
So.. I don't really like it, but it might still end up my daily driver. It's good enough I guess
but you'll have to factor in that I'm cheap. If I lived in the US and was looking to buy something new I'd probably join the Argos preorder instead.
Even though I'm mostly seeing downsides with Flair 58 it still makes sense for someone who mostly drinks 1:2-1:3 light roast, low pressure espresso. A bottom paper filter and full pre-heat will get me close with the Robot, but I believe the chamfered basket is the limiting factor. It makes pulling shots forgiving, also with light roasts, but pushing for really high extractions without resorting to allongé is difficult.
It's a trend with both the Flair Classic and Flair 58: easier to reach high extractions but somewhat annoying to use. For medium to dark roasts I much prefer the Robot.. But the Flair is greedy for counter space and it's already in position.. while my Robot never needed a permanent place. Unless I can get a different basket for it I'm afraid it might sit on a shelf more and more

So.. I don't really like it, but it might still end up my daily driver. It's good enough I guess

It's interesting that a Flair 58 review is posted in the Robot mega thread. That definitely says something.
Why sorry, this forum is about as much info as can possibly be gathered, including opinions.
Did you, Ken? His "review" was posted on August 12. I must have missed your request.
I didn't mean to imply that there's anything wrong with posting about another machine here, just that it says something.
I didn't mean to imply that there's anything wrong with posting about another machine here, just that it says something.
Ambiguous comments aside, Flair is in my mind the main competition to the Robot. It's not the first time they're compared in this thread and likely not the last. This'll also get buried soon, and that's fine by me. It's still somehow part of my user experience with the Robot.
I thought I'd share more background. I was recently served espresso made with a Decent DE1. It was an excellent shot, but I was taken aback by how hot it was. I've been using the same double walled glass cups with the Robot, but the espresso won't burn my mouth as I take the first sip.. I don't have a precise way to measure temperature..
Anyway, intrigued by this and the lure of having access to the (now slightly more affordable) new wave of high extraction baskets made me pick up the same second hand Flair 58 I'd passed on previously when it turned up for sale. By the same imprecise metric, using the F58 shots can definitely be hot enough to be uncomfortable to sip
but my guess is that it too brews slightly cooler than what can be done with the DE1 (and plenty of other machines).
Either way, even on the lowest setting (Flair claims 85C, I'd like to see an actual graph) there's already been a noticeable difference. I realised I've missed my old VST baskets. I remember having issues pulling very light roasts with the Robot in the beginning, years ago. I thought I had resolved it either by using a bottom paper filter, upgrading to a more suitable grinder (bigger difference) and when everything else fails pulling allongé. It's only been 3 weeks, but I've overall been getting more edgy shots with F58 and baskets without chamfer. I wrote a proper review about the Robot vs. Flair Classic a few years back in my native language. It was a wash tastewise, but the Robot won due to build quality, workflow and feel. It still excels in those categories, but my initial impression is that F58 can do one specific style of shot better or more enjoyable to me. The capacity is lower so I haven't been able to try anything above 1:3.5
Couldn't keep it brief. Perhaps this warrants a separate thread after all.
I thought I'd share more background. I was recently served espresso made with a Decent DE1. It was an excellent shot, but I was taken aback by how hot it was. I've been using the same double walled glass cups with the Robot, but the espresso won't burn my mouth as I take the first sip.. I don't have a precise way to measure temperature..

Anyway, intrigued by this and the lure of having access to the (now slightly more affordable) new wave of high extraction baskets made me pick up the same second hand Flair 58 I'd passed on previously when it turned up for sale. By the same imprecise metric, using the F58 shots can definitely be hot enough to be uncomfortable to sip

Either way, even on the lowest setting (Flair claims 85C, I'd like to see an actual graph) there's already been a noticeable difference. I realised I've missed my old VST baskets. I remember having issues pulling very light roasts with the Robot in the beginning, years ago. I thought I had resolved it either by using a bottom paper filter, upgrading to a more suitable grinder (bigger difference) and when everything else fails pulling allongé. It's only been 3 weeks, but I've overall been getting more edgy shots with F58 and baskets without chamfer. I wrote a proper review about the Robot vs. Flair Classic a few years back in my native language. It was a wash tastewise, but the Robot won due to build quality, workflow and feel. It still excels in those categories, but my initial impression is that F58 can do one specific style of shot better or more enjoyable to me. The capacity is lower so I haven't been able to try anything above 1:3.5
Couldn't keep it brief. Perhaps this warrants a separate thread after all.
Nooo, FTP!Jonk wrote:Couldn't keep it brief. Perhaps this warrants a separate thread after all.
Yesterday I used food grade silicone to glue a round disk that I cut out of a silicone baking mat to the bottom of the piston. Now the piston isn't warm to the touch after pulling a shot. Also so far I can't taste a difference between shots with or without warming the piston. Only downside: it's probably more work to clean.
I tried that a couple of years ago, back when I had an embedded sensor to monitor shot water temperature. What I found was that gluing silicone to the piston bottom didn't affect shot temperature very much. The piston still absorbed heat through the exposed metal between the insulated bottom and the seal/gasket. When I glued a thin strip of silicone to cover that area too the water temperature profile was hotter, although still not as hot as preheating by soaking the piston in boiling water for a couple of minutes.ende42 wrote:Yesterday I used food grade silicone to glue a round disk that I cut out of a silicone baking mat to the bottom of the piston. Now the piston isn't warm to the touch after pulling a shot. Also so far I can't taste a difference between shots with or without warming the piston. Only downside: it's probably more work to clean.
See: Some like it hot: Cafelat Robot Temperature Mods
The best passive mod I've tried is replacing the steel piston with a plastic one. That was as good as preheating with boiling water. But my test piston wasn't durably food safe so I retired it. There's a guy here on HB that is in the process of making a food safe plastic piston. I've been eagerly awaiting his work, hoping to test one.