Tasting comparison between Sweet, Ode 2, Sculptor 64s and 078 - Page 5

Grinders are one of the keys to exceptional espresso. Discuss them here.
iBrew

#41: Post by iBrew »

superworrier wrote:My 2c is this is very ungenerous and a different impression than you'd get from following his content, where he states his stuff is just opinions, and what his preferences are. I think there is a little bit of a problem in that because his content is good and thorough, people are thinking they have the same preferences.

For a counterpoint to your comments, he made a post calling out Timemore for the shipping shenanigans. Also, I don't think hate towards Comandante is unusual, there is a lot of it, and for good reason (business practices suing companies, not updating their grinder). I don't think I've seen him "call out" other reviewers, just calrify what his procedure is.

I think Timemore, being Chinese, probably is getting more flak from this because they are a Chinese company. Prima has a bigger conflict of interest than these influencers, given they literally sell the Ode and Ditting grinders, but not the Timemore (who directly skipped the retail channel).

That being said, no person is infallible, and even if an influencer is completely unbiased, it doesn't mean they share your same tastes and preferences. Sometimes people just have different views, and that's why I think things are the way they are. I think Hoffmann was way too harsh on the Ode in his review (after owning this and the Niche, which he highly rates workflow wise). Do I think he was paid off? No, he probably just had a different experience, and has different things he finds frustrating than I do.
That's not true... in the 078 review they talked about how they had the Timemore rep in house and they have orders coming. No one seems to have an issue with Timemore... I liked that they took this on and bringing it to market.. zeros issues with Timemore. I may even buy the 078. None of the issues being brought up is about Timemore or China.

LewBK

#42: Post by LewBK »

I think Timemore, being Chinese, probably is getting more flak from this because they are a Chinese company. Prima has a bigger conflict of interest than these influencers, given they literally sell the Ode and Ditting grinders, but not the Timemore (who directly skipped the retail channel).
Prima also sells plenty of products made by Timemore: https://prima-coffee.com/manufacturers/timemoreSo the notion that the Prima reviewer is favoring Ditting or Fellow because Prima sells those grinders seems unfair. Moreover, the reviewer states that Prima had just had a meeting with Timemore about the Sculptor. I would say the likelihood that Prima ultimately starts selling the Sculptor too is high.

superworrier

#43: Post by superworrier replying to LewBK »

I didn't feel the need to say this, but that was just an example to make a point. I agree it's unfair to say that. I do take an issue with the methodology of matching by visual grind size however, but I don't think that was influenced by any conflict of interest.

That being said, the Kickstarter market does equal to a lot of missed retail sales.

User avatar
primacoffee
Sponsor

#44: Post by primacoffee »

Can you imagine how tough it must be for green buyers and Q-graders to taste ultra-fresh and sometimes questionably roasted coffees at origin, and then making major buying decisions based on that data? It's an imperfect approach to determining full flavor potential but one that still provides good enough information to make informed decisions.

Comparing taste by matching grind is one of a few legitimate ways you can evaluate grinders, but It is not comprehensive. It's one of the quickest ways to get a sense of inherent qualities with standard brew methods. As some have inferred, it comes at the cost of some brews potentially exceeding an ideal extraction threshold or channeling, and some grinders falling short of an ideal extraction threshold.

In my opinion, if you choose a reasonable grind size for the dose, roast and brew method, you'll get a reasonable representation of a grinder's flavor qualities, especially when it comes to body and clarity. Cupping is another approach, EY match is another, and individual dial-in is yet another method. All of these protocols produce valuable and legitimate information that teach us about the coffee and equipment used.

-Ryan
Prima Coffee
888-837-7892
4603 Poplar Level Rd
Louisville, KY 40213
http://prima-coffee.com

Iceman2913

#45: Post by Iceman2913 »

Rytopa wrote:I have been using the 078 as my daily driver for a couple of months and loaning it to a friend with a Bentwood for comparision, and would like to share my thoughts

1) Built Quality no complaints, very well built

2) Taste:

This is where it gets interesting. The 078 has a taste profile that is very unlike the traditional flat or conical burrs. I would say closer to the ghost burrs profile but enhanced, especially when playing around with RPM.

The taste profile is considered very "flat", neutral with a strong emphasis on balance, without any particular focus on taste notes (ie, acidity, chocolate, etc). Imagining a soundtrack on the digital visualizer, you see all the waves up and down as the music hits different notes, with the 078, the highs and lows are more "compressed" meaning you hit lesser of the highs and lows. An interesting aspect of this grinder is as you dial finer or coarser, the notes do not really change much, except the strength (you get more of a stronger coffee vibe), which makes this grinder extremely forgiving in dialing in.

Compared to say a large flat burr, whereby small changes to dial settings can magnify or tone down certain notes quite drastically, the 078 does not exhibit this characteristic. I have been at 8 grind setting consistently, (max 18) and I don't see the need to change it. Because the taste profile is so neutral, I have been playing more with brewing methods and techniques instead. Flatbed brewers are quite a no go with this grinder as they already tend to focus on balance. V60 is preferred here with higher temps which can bring out more flavors. Also worth exploring is pouring speed, turbulence, etc, as the grinds are very easy to handle under such situations, with the lack of fines and very granular-looking particle sizes.

Higher RPM tend to stretch out the notes more, however for lower quality beans and bad roast, harshness tends to set in. Lowering the RPM compresses the notes more, at the lowest RPM will usually get you the "safest" cup profile.
Coming back to this post because someone just posted this in the timemore fb group, seeing more and more post similar to yours.

The post:
Hello! 078 owner in the UK here!
Just looking for thoughts. I guess this is the first grinder I've worked with that has such particle uniformity. I'm a coffee professional and have a ton of experience with espresso grinders and EKs.
I'm really enjoying the intense sweetness and clarity I'm getting from the 078 but I'm finding brews are a little one dimensional and can lack acidity. It's almost as if I can predict what the coffee will taste like before I brew. I do admit I haven't used it LOADS yet but I've tried a bunch of different coffees - washed Kenya, Anaerobic Brazil, Guat gesha and Burundi nat as just a cross section, but although they have their unique flavour notes the profile is generally all the same - sweet and low acid.
Any advice, or is this just what the 078 burrs do?

superworrier

#46: Post by superworrier »

Maybe brew method is the other variable? Maybe EY just needs to be pushed higher? Less astringency may change how people dial in (although people say the sweet spot is very large). Hard to say until you unite someone who loves it and someone who does not.

malling

#47: Post by malling »

It dos sounds lots like many cast that are also very sweet, has some good clarity (not as high as unimodal) with body that give a sort of juiciness to it, but doesn't have the highest acidity.

I do think they offer something that doesn't hide the difference aspect but it's definitely not as much in your face as other profiles, it's definitely more laidback. But I also found it to be more workable for a wider variety then those high clarity burrs.

braxtonjens

#48: Post by braxtonjens »

Brew at something between 89-93 C
And between ratios of 1:12-1:14

This has been my "zone" for my ghost burr at home.

Keep in mind ghost / turbo/ hybrid ghost flats will act different than conicals and flats.

Factor is a decent amount of time to learn these burrs.
“Coffee is always a good idea”
LMWDP #617

braxtonjens

#49: Post by braxtonjens »

I have super juicy sweet brews with luxurious mouthfeel.

This is on another ghost burr, not specifically TIMEMORE.

A really nice profile.
“Coffee is always a good idea”
LMWDP #617