Ross Droplet Technique-Eliminating Grinder Static - Page 2

Grinders are one of the keys to exceptional espresso. Discuss them here.
User avatar
jbviau
Posts: 1473
Joined: Jul 02, 2010, 8:08 am

Postby jbviau » Dec 19, 2012, 12:58 am

Ok, I'm impressed. Thanks!

LIDO #002 with 15 g. of Anodyne's Peru Cenfrocafe (past peak) at a coarse drip setting. No knocking, shaking, clacking of any kind.

Before RDT:
Image

After RDT (2 drops):
Image
"It's not anecdotal evidence, it's artisanal data." -Matt Yglesias

erik82
Posts: 536
Joined: Feb 16, 2012, 8:35 am

Postby erik82 » Dec 19, 2012, 2:56 am

Great tip! I'll try it with the Indian Monsooned Malabar which is extremely static. Always had big problems with the static charge of these beans and grounds being all over the place.

User avatar
TomC
Team HB
Posts: 7736
Joined: Jun 06, 2011, 1:46 pm

Postby TomC » Dec 19, 2012, 3:30 am

Take pics and report back if you can. This will be an epic thread for home coffee enthusiasts. Who hasn't dealt with grind retention in one way or another on a grinder, manual or electric?

outrigger
Posts: 23
Joined: Mar 07, 2008, 5:10 am

Postby outrigger » Dec 19, 2012, 4:12 am

This is Maaagic :D ,
Thanks a lot for the trick, almost no sticky fines on my yoghurt funnel!

User avatar
Bob_McBob
Posts: 2306
Joined: Jan 21, 2009, 7:12 pm

Postby Bob_McBob » Dec 19, 2012, 4:18 am

I would imagine an eye dropper or pipette of some sort would be a worthwhile investment if you want to keep doing this.
Chris

erik82
Posts: 536
Joined: Feb 16, 2012, 8:35 am

Postby erik82 » Dec 19, 2012, 4:47 am

Also thought about an eye dropper. That would be perfect with single-dosing. Going to get one this afternoon and see how it goes.

User avatar
aecletec
Posts: 1751
Joined: Dec 29, 2010, 6:12 am

Postby aecletec » Dec 19, 2012, 5:45 am

Very clever. Will chance my luck later :)

ryguy
Posts: 16
Joined: Nov 15, 2010, 8:54 pm

Postby ryguy » Dec 19, 2012, 8:44 am

Bob_McBob wrote:I would imagine an eye dropper or pipette of some sort would be a worthwhile investment if you want to keep doing this.


And a pipette will fit perfectly next to my dissecting needle!
Ryan

User avatar
Spitz.me
Posts: 1390
Joined: Dec 24, 2009, 9:00 am

Postby Spitz.me » Dec 19, 2012, 9:10 am

So some quantifiable results with the k10 - as if pictures weren't enough.

20.7g IN
15.9 OUT into the DOSER 76.8%
4.8g RETAINED in the chute and upper chamber. 23.2%
100% OUT

Give or take .1g error and/or .1g from the earlier shot.

I will check, for myself anyway, what the difference is without the droplets of water. But, I seem to be recalling a number closer to 8g retained in the chute and upper chamber.

This makes the bumping and grindings a little easier just because there's less 'aggressive' sweeping that needs to be done as they move out of the chute more easily.

I also checked after I finished my espresso how much I would have to clean from the K10 and, although the retention is .1g or so usually (very small), it was similarly very little retained that I had to clean. However, the grinds move more easily.
I know I've pulled a great shot when the flavour is 'like a beany taste that tastes like a bean'.

User avatar
Boldjava
Posts: 2089
Joined: Jul 02, 2008, 7:52 pm

Postby Boldjava » Dec 19, 2012, 9:18 am

Water on the beans? It's Winter here and the heat is on. Humidifiers balance the moisture in the air for us since the furnace takes it out of the air. With the humidifiers running, I see only very slight static and don't have need to put water on the beans.
-----
LMWDP #339

 
Sponsored by counterculturecoffee.com
www.counterculturecoffee.com: coffee driven people, people driven coffee