Mystery Grinder HELP
Hi knowledgeable friends,
There is a new grinder out there (not yet released probably). I cannot for the life of me remember the name. They have 3 versions. a large flat, a large conical and then a double grinder than has both combined. The combined one actually looked like 2 Monoliths stuck together. All single dose but I think there was a hopper attachment you can get as well.
it looked really amazing and I wanted to read abut it but i totally forgot the brand name and I cannot find it in here.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
There is a new grinder out there (not yet released probably). I cannot for the life of me remember the name. They have 3 versions. a large flat, a large conical and then a double grinder than has both combined. The combined one actually looked like 2 Monoliths stuck together. All single dose but I think there was a hopper attachment you can get as well.
it looked really amazing and I wanted to read abut it but i totally forgot the brand name and I cannot find it in here.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
- mckolit
If you search the googles for "twin coffee grinder" you might get lucky. Bunch of mahlkonigs, la marzocco swift, even bunn grinders.
- JB90068
- Supporter ♡
Could it be a Titus?
Old baristas never die. They just become over extracted.
Not a Titus. The grinder is tilted similar to how the EG1 or the MC4 is. The way the beans are loaded reminded me of the MC4. The twin machine is like two MC4 stuck together
- JB90068
- Supporter ♡
Right... Vaguely remember it came in chrome or maybe all black?Iconicred wrote:Not a Titus. The grinder is tilted similar to how the EG1 or the MC4 is. The way the beans are loaded reminded me of the MC4. The twin machine is like two MC4 stuck together
Old baristas never die. They just become over extracted.
- JB90068
- Supporter ♡
Old baristas never die. They just become over extracted.
Yes. I think it had both. The marketing looked really cool. The photos were cool. And i remember they were large chunky machines. Maybe the flats were even 100mm+ in size and I think the conical were 83
Yes! thank you Pham and JB! This is the one!pham wrote:it is Ozik the "All".
- HB
- Admin
Dan Kehn