Recommendations for a "traditional" espresso - Page 5

Discuss flavors, brew temperatures, blending, and cupping notes.
User avatar
Spitz.me
Posts: 1963
Joined: 14 years ago

#41: Post by Spitz.me »

Nearly all of these traditional espresso blends will taste really bad if you don't pull them to what makes sense for that blend, no differently to any other blend really. I would never do relatively high temps and long shots for these blends. Relatively low temps and ristretto range is the only style that makes these blends sing.

This is no different for me regardless of freshness for these blends. I've had "fresh" Saka, Malabar Gold, Vivace, Illy and even the Roma one off blend from Cafe Lusso. Fresh isn't better IMHO. Fresh has its own issues and rest or more stealing seems to make for a tastier cup. Saka Gran Crema wasn't better than Lavazza Gold Selection. Malabar Gold wasn't great either, even though it's consistently recommended as a go-to. Lionshare takes forever to be even drinkable IMHO and was the worst of the above listed blends. 100% Arabica is even worse for these blends.

Clearly, YMMV. Taste is purely subjective and no, fresh or boutique isn't objectively better. Lavazza and Kimbo blends can be very tasty if this is the style you want.
Keep looking until you're happy, but definitely make sure you got the process down for these blends. They need care to be good. They can quickly become ash water and putrid.
LMWDP #670

User avatar
slybarman
Posts: 1207
Joined: 12 years ago

#42: Post by slybarman »

Spitz.me wrote: Relatively low temps and ristretto range is the only style that makes these blends sing.

.Malabar Gold wasn't great either, even though it's consistently recommended as a go-to.
if you pulled Malabar at low temp, that would explain why you didn't have a good experience. Malabar, like GMC, requires higher temps despite being darker roasts.

Advertisement
PIXIllate
Supporter ♡
Posts: 1338
Joined: 5 years ago

#43: Post by PIXIllate »

slybarman wrote:Sette 270wi with conical burrs, which if anything, should be better than flats for dark roasts (or so i think I've read) - more body etc. unlikely it's a grinder issue given it works great for all the other dark roasts i normally drink.

i still appreciate the recommendation, this one just didn't land for me.

The thing about higher end grinders is they are going to be more uniform with far fewer fines which are the parts of the grind that are the smallest and therefore will over extract the fastest.

I can highly recommend the Hatch blends if you want to try something in the same vein but from the specialty coffee world.

nameisjoey
Posts: 495
Joined: 4 years ago

#44: Post by nameisjoey »

I'm currently working through a 6oz bag of Hayes Valley from Blue Bottle. It's 14 days off roast and very impressively good. Like, I'm pretty blown away. I expected to like 17ft Ceiling better but I didn't. I actually didn't like it all that much, even as a die hard italian roast fan. But this Hayes Valley slaps. Tons of body and rich chocolate notes with this tiny subtle very far away and almost missable orange note that flitters in and out and leaves you wanting more.

User avatar
Spitz.me
Posts: 1963
Joined: 14 years ago

#45: Post by Spitz.me »

slybarman wrote:if you pulled Malabar at low temp, that would explain why you didn't have a good experience. Malabar, like GMC, requires higher temps despite being darker roasts.
Thanks for the feedback. I did try everything and still never liked it - I did have 5 pounds.... GMC and Lionshare are very different. I liked GMC. I also had 5 pounds of lionshare and suffice it to say I didn't just pull it one way for 5 pounds. I didn't like it.
LMWDP #670

User avatar
slybarman
Posts: 1207
Joined: 12 years ago

#46: Post by slybarman »

makes me sad because i know how good Malabar can be.

there are times when i wished we all lived in the same city and i could make you a latte from Malabar and i could give my bag of Lavazza Gold to Piixlllate to compare against what he had. that sure would make things a whole lot easier. trying to explain and compare tastes over the interweb is frustrating.

PIXIllate
Supporter ♡
Posts: 1338
Joined: 5 years ago

#47: Post by PIXIllate »

In the end everyone has to do their own experiments and come to their own first hand conclusions. It's amazing how difficult it is to make this tiny drink to high standards, but it's rewarding when you finally get it right.

The other variable that crossed my mind is water. That can have a large effect on the experience of two people in different places.

Advertisement
User avatar
slybarman
Posts: 1207
Joined: 12 years ago

#48: Post by slybarman »

came back to Lusso GMC this morning after a several year hiatus. it is still a super pleasant chocolate bomb.

i had gotten away from Lusso back when the postal service was having all kinds of problems and it was taking weeks to ship. that was the around the same time Saka was being imported more regularly, so I started on Saka and didn't look back.

delivery was very fast again. i received the GMC 3 days post roast and let it sit a week before freezing most of it.

kinda-niche
Posts: 61
Joined: 2 years ago

#49: Post by kinda-niche »

Man, Lusso espresso blends have been on my list forever, but the shipping costs and order minimums are just ridiculously! Also, those beautiful cappuccino cups are no longer listed on the website, so I'd really need to get the bulk size bags to claim free shipping.

Which one should I start with - GMC or Lionshare? (Gotta choose carefully if I am ordering a large quantity :D )

User avatar
coffee-fox
Supporter ♡
Posts: 19
Joined: 5 years ago

#50: Post by coffee-fox »

My Caffe Lusso favorite is the Atlas Free Blend. It's GMC (Brazils) + Ethiopia which adds a berry notes to milk chocolate and caramel. Delicious for espresso and milk drinks.
Michael Davis