Will I be disappointed by older super autos?

Recommendations for buyers and upgraders from the site's members.
Dano83
Posts: 4
Joined: 5 years ago

#1: Post by Dano83 »

Hello,

I have been using a breville barista express now for about 6 months. I'm fairly happy with it for how much it costs but i don't really have any luck getting consistent pulls from it. Anyway, we just had our second kid so extra time in the morning is hard to come by. Because of this, I've been thinking about switching to a super automatic.
I've seen a couple Delonghi Magnifica 3400 machines pop up locally for around $150.

My question is, am I going to be disappointment in the flavor from one of these older super autos? I just drink straight shots and dont really care about steaming milk. Just be blunt...I would rather know before I go buy one.

Any input is much appreciated!

ojt
Posts: 846
Joined: 6 years ago

#2: Post by ojt »

From my experience, yes, you will be disappointed. Sorry :)

I've too small-ish kids and know all the hoopla that goes with that, and quite frankly during the week I am just fine with a nice big Bialetti Moka (big in italian terms == 2 cup moka). Use my Pavoni only on the weekends.

Point being, IMHO, better invest for good equipment and concentrate the effort for when you CAN take the time, rather than dilute the whole experience. Less is more as they say.

Just my 2 cents :)
Osku

Advertisement
User avatar
sweaner
Posts: 3013
Joined: 16 years ago

#3: Post by sweaner »

Do you have a grinder?
What coffees are you using?

I would bet that those cheap machines are not going to work well.
Scott
LMWDP #248

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22028
Joined: 19 years ago

#4: Post by HB »

Dano83 wrote:My question is, am I going to be disappointment in the flavor from one of these older super autos?
Williams-Sonoma and the like have demo super-automatics to sample. In my limited experience, they're barely passable. If time is limited and you really want espresso, Nespresso or Keurig capsule brewers are unbeatable on convenience.
Dano83 wrote:Anyway, we just had our second kid so extra time in the morning is hard to come by... I just drink straight shots and dont really care about steaming milk.
Switching to pourover or French Press ticks the "no time, good coffee" requirement. If you really, really want espresso, manual levers like the Cafelat Robot or Flair Espresso are about as quick as it gets since they require no warmup time. You'd have to budget 5-10 minutes start to finish, including cleanup.
Dan Kehn

User avatar
bluesman
Posts: 1594
Joined: 10 years ago

#5: Post by bluesman »

We had a small Nespresso on our counter for many years. It's a great way to make good, consistent shots quickly. It won't equal the best from a good DB or HX machine, but it's far better than many SBDU units in the hands of hurried, harried parents with too much to do and too little time to do it. It even beats better machines if your technique isn't excellent.

I kept it alongside our "real" machine until it died. We didn't replace it because we're both now retired and our kids are adults with their own homes, so we have the luxury of time. But if the need arose (eg pied-à-terre), we wouldn't hesitate to get another.

ojt
Posts: 846
Joined: 6 years ago

#6: Post by ojt »

bluesman wrote:... Nespresso on our counter for many years. It's a great way to make good, consistent shots quickly. ...
And this is where it goes down to taste. I far prefer a quick moka brew to Nespresso myself. They even cost almost the same. But yeah, out of the super automatics, I'd rather give 50€ for Nespresso than anything above that price point. In fact, any old drip machine is better. Strictly imho of course.
Osku

ojt
Posts: 846
Joined: 6 years ago

#7: Post by ojt »

HB wrote:If time is limited and you really want espresso, Nespresso or Keurig capsule brewers are unbeatable on convenience.
Being HB, should we now start a debate if Nespresso qualifies as espresso? :) I would've liked to say "In italy they'd never qualify that for espresso!" but sadly they're quite popular.. :roll:
Osku

Advertisement
User avatar
bluesman
Posts: 1594
Joined: 10 years ago

#8: Post by bluesman replying to ojt »

Nespresso comes closer to the certification standards of the Istituto Nazionale Espresso Italiano than most traditional shots. The "official" recipe is:
  • 7 gm of ground coffee
  • 9 bar brew pressure
  • 88 degrees C brew temp
  • 20 - 30 sec brew time
  • 22.5 - 27.5 ml shot volume
A Nespresso pod has 5 (standard) or 6 (lungo) gm of coffee in it and puts out about 40 ml of espresso in about 25 seconds. I've never found a clear statement of Nespresso brew pressure.

Nespresso machines turn out a consistently tastier shot than many, many so-called espressos out of "better" machines in some very fancy places. It's never great but it's also never bad. They offer many different coffees, so most of us can find at least one we actually like - for me, it's the black pod Ristretto or the purple pod Arpeggio.

So all kidding aside, I strongly believe that Nespresso does make espresso.

voozy
Posts: 55
Joined: 5 years ago

#9: Post by voozy »

I've always found nespresso to be drinkable even though I don't like the pod concept, the tiny dose, the marketing, or the parent company. There are other companies now making compatible pods now, which is a slight mitigation. There's also a new model (Vertuo) with bigger pods, but I think no compatible pods for it yet, maybe because patents.
Everyone drinks Voozy.

User avatar
BaristaBoy E61
Posts: 3545
Joined: 9 years ago

#10: Post by BaristaBoy E61 »

Dano83 wrote: My question is, am I going to be disappointment in the flavor from one of these older super autos? I just drink straight shots and dont really care about steaming milk. Just be blunt...I would rather know before I go buy one.

Any input is much appreciated!
Because I know I'd be disappointed, in you situation I'd opt for a Moka Pot and call it a day (or morning).
"You didn't buy an Espresso Machine - You bought a Chemistry Set!"

Post Reply