Have Rancilio Rocky, looking for an alternative (willing to pay more) - Page 2

Recommendations for buyers and upgraders from the site's members.
User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22021
Joined: 19 years ago

#11: Post by HB »

Let me clarify why I was asking about the doserless vs. doser grinder.

Most doserless grinders I've used clump a lot, but not all. The value-priced Le'Lit PL53, for example, is nearly clumpless. It is rather loud, retains a good 2-3 grams of coffee, and the adjustment mechanism is fine-tuned for espresso. I owned the Rocky doserless and spent a lot of time thwacking the sides trying to eject the grounds it invariably held back (joking at the time that it's called "Rocky" for a reason). Ian reports good results with his Macap MC4 grinding one shot at a time. I used it with a full hopper and successive shots; the snout held back a sizeable wad of coffee and the ground coffee was replete with boulders. The electronic version of the same grinder wasn't better in this respect:

Image
Macap M4 Electronic Doserless vs. Mazzer Mini E Espresso Grinder

Early reports of the Baratza Vario are promising. Between it and the already proven PL53, I'm hopeful that manufacturers will finally shore up the long-known shortcomings of some doserless grinders. In the meantime it's worth investigating the strengths and weaknesses of the doserless grinders on your shortlist since their performance may vary more dramatically than the doser-equipped models in the same class.
Dan Kehn

User avatar
cafeIKE
Posts: 4717
Joined: 18 years ago

#12: Post by cafeIKE »

HB wrote: Ian reports good results with his Macap MC4 grinding one shot at a time. I used it with a full hopper and successive shots; the snout held back a sizeable wad of coffee and the ground coffee was replete with boulders.
Correction :
  • - hopper always contains ~250g
    - snout cleared of stuck coffee at end of shot
    - always grind ~2g stale coffee into the bin before next shot
In nearly 3 years with this grinder, I've never seen anything remotely close the picture above. :D

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22021
Joined: 19 years ago

#13: Post by HB »

Actually the MC4 that I used produced even worse boulders than pictured above, but I didn't clear the snout after every shot (using what, a chopstick?). The particulars of your grinder aside for a moment, I think that I've made my point: Doserless and doser grinders may need attending to, some more than others. Buyers should not assume doserless = no fuss, no muss. Based on the early reports, the Baratza Vario could be a doserless grinder admirer's dream machine.
Dan Kehn

User avatar
mhoy
Posts: 1138
Joined: 16 years ago

#14: Post by mhoy »

HB wrote:Based on the early reports, the Baratza Vario could be a doserless grinder admirer's dream machine.
Boy, do I hope this turns out to be true. :D

Mark

User avatar
cafeIKE
Posts: 4717
Joined: 18 years ago

#15: Post by cafeIKE »

HB wrote:I didn't clear the snout after every shot (using what, a chopstick?).
MC4 snout clearing tool to the right of the scale



Espresso is a dirty business. If you do it long enough, you'll come across all kinds of harebrained dogma. The most under used word on-line is "may." The sad state of affairs is I can test a $50,000 car or $1,000 tv but not a $500 grinder. Which is why anyone is always free to PM and arrange to come and try whatever I've got. 8)

User avatar
Randy G.
Posts: 5340
Joined: 17 years ago

#16: Post by Randy G. »

HB wrote:.... Based on the early reports, the Baratza Vario could be a doserless grinder admirer's dream machine.
I have used the Baratza Virtuoso grinder and had two complaints- the first was the coarse adjustment steps and difficulty to fine tune it for espresso, and the second being the static problem. From what I saw from the Vario earlier this year, the adjustment problem has been dealt with quite well. If they have limited the static problem I think it will be a winner, if for no other reason than it will be a very small footprint grinder capable of doing espresso without difficulty. I hope to be able to review one....
EspressoMyEspresso.com - 2000-2023 - a good run, its time is done

User avatar
TUS172
Posts: 694
Joined: 17 years ago

#17: Post by TUS172 »

Randy G. wrote:Partial: From what I saw from the Vario earlier this year, the adjustment problem has been dealt with quite well. If they have limited the static problem I think it will be a winner, if for no other reason than it will be a very small footprint grinder capable of doing espresso without difficulty. I hope to be able to review one....
I have a Vario on order from Espresso Parts... So when they do receive them and ship I will be testing. There is also "ddr" (Dan Roscigno) who has ordered one and plans on doing a review. 8)
Bob C.
(No longer a lever purist!)
LMWDP #012

IMAWriter
Posts: 3472
Joined: 19 years ago

#18: Post by IMAWriter »

I as well. Should be arriving end of December, early January, as Baratza was working on a static issue, I believe.

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22021
Joined: 19 years ago

#19: Post by HB »

The equipment sponsors get the bounty of exposure thanks to the site reviews, research from the Bench forum, etc. One of the goals for HB in 2009 is to bring more of the great coffee roasters that sponsor HB into the limelight. The MVP Espresso Blend sponsored by Paradise Roasters is one example, and now Jeff Taylor of PT's Coffee has agreed to sponsor the evaluation of the Baratza Vario.

The form of the evaluation is still under development, but I look forward to reading the early comments from the gentlemen above and contributing our own. Thanks Jeff for the quick reply!
Dan Kehn

IMAWriter
Posts: 3472
Joined: 19 years ago

#20: Post by IMAWriter »

That's great! I can save my money a bit longer!
Merry Christmas to all.