Matthew Brinski wrote:When I started out, I took some effort with 5 pounds of coffee, a tenth gram scale, and Stockfleths move on a Saturday afternoon to learn how to dose and distribute different volumes/weights for that specific coffee. Having developed a "feel" for the dose of certain blends and SOs with months of practice and experimentation, I think the the payoff is priceless... When you know what the "feel" of the dose is with certain coffees, you can be super consistent and super fast in your preparation while dosing at different desired amounts.
Be honest: did you expend anywhere near the same amount of coffee and effort with the WDT as Stockfleths? I've got a good feel for dosing and distributing with the WDT, but I've been using it almost exclusively for the past two years. As a result, I'm
more consistent (and faster) with the WDT than any other technique.
Matthew Brinski wrote:... if you WDT a given amount of Toscano which yields a somewhat consistent 18 gram dose and then do the same WDT/volume with a Terroir Northern, the Terroir is going to be about 22 grams (it's a dense coffee) which is WAY TOO MUCH in my opinion - 18 grams is actually to much, but I digress.
Sorry Matthew, but I have a hard time understanding this. All the WDT does is break up clumps and redistribute grounds in the basket. Different grinders and different grinding/dosing techniques accomplish pretty much the same thing in different ways. What do you think is happening when you thwack away at the doser, while rotating and perhaps tapping the PF under the grinder? If you dosed 22g with Terroir beans, it's not because you used the WDT - it's because you dosed 22g.
Matthew Brinski wrote:I just don't get the doserless preference.
You prefer dosers, and you're in good company: so does Dan Kehn. But I prefer doserless for home use. Having removed the doser from my Mazzer SJ, I've never, ever had the slightest inclination to reattach it. Some of the most prized grinders for home use are doserless (Mazzer Mini E and the Versalab M3).
Matthew Brinski wrote:I guess what I'm saying is that there are good ways and better ways. People have difference in opinion of what the "better" way is.
There are many ways to achieve an exceptional espresso pour. But the foundation for all of them is an even distribution of grounds in the filter basket. If my article (now almost one year old!) helped take some of the spotlight off tamping and focus more attention on distribution, then I'd say it achieved its purpose.