Per my recent "success" at finally making an espresso I can actually enjoy, I discovered that 18g of beans gave me the best extractions. Admittedly, this is pre-grinder, I didn't weigh the final in-basket dose, but previously, I've noted that there's very little difference between the two weights, as I use a brush to pick up stuck / stray grounds and ensure the doser is swept empty. (Mazzer mini)
This still gives me some headspace, banishes early-blonding and any channeling, and leaves me with a slight shower-screen imprint in the spent puck in my Zaffiro.
If I dose less than this, it all falls apart. I feel that I have finally developed a repeatable technique and get consistent results (even if that's only recently, and has taken months), but down-dosing seems to leave so much headspace that the coffee expands too much until it finally becomes weak, especially around the edges, sometimes in the middle. It seems like basic physics at work.
I recently read an article (I forget where it was, and sadly I didn't bookmark it) that suggested that smaller doses gave better actual percentage extractions of the coffee, and that common Italian practise was to dose about 13g for a double. It seems that different coffees benefit from different doses also. My 18g double seems a long way from this "common practise", especially as the machine is itself Italian.
I appreciate my technique may not be refined enough to successfully down-dose a stock basket, but, given that I hear folks talk about experimenting with smaller "12g" baskets and there are much larger "21g" baskets kicking around, I'm a little confused on the matter.
Is it just me, or do others have issues with experimenting with dose amount, probably due to the relationship between the normal basket size and the headspace requirement of their particular machine ?
I'd appreciate any insights into this. I sort of feel I'm missing out somehow
Jon
[EDIT: Linked post has now been deleted]



