malachi wrote:You know... I've never thought about it, but it would probably be a worthwhile experiment for most folks to pull a normal shot, then build the exact same shot but cut it at 2/3 extraction (by time) and at 1 1/3 extraction (again by time) and taste them all.
Obviously... this won't be a really accurate way of producing over-extraction or under-extraction in the true sense in any guaranteed way -- but as said, without investing in a refractometer it's probably the best close approximation and could at least enable people to start tasting the differences.
I think this is a great thought.
Some trainers do an exercise where they dial the shot in to pull properly, then use a series of shotglasses to catch the extract in parts: the first one catches the extract from 0-10 seconds, 2nd catches 10-20 seconds, etc. The samples are then smelled and tasted, with discussion on each sample's flavor, body, sweetness, aroma, crema, intensity, bitterness, etc. That is meant to demonstrate the different extraction rates of the various components, which I believe is also helpful in diagnosing over/under extraction.
To the OP, I suspect that the question is more "my shot pulled too fast", and am in agreement with Chris's approach. Try one, then the other, and see which extraction is "best". I'd likely start with dose, because that is an easier change... but since they're already at 16g already, think grind is probably the better choice.
Jim's point is well made though.