Java Joe wrote:I think my point of view is going right over you your head. You refuse to understand how some people learn to do different things including making espresso. You seem to think everyone is an noob or an expert and no in between from what I read.
I think my point of view is going right over your head. So let's reset. Let's assume, for a second, that the goal of purchasing all this equipment and putting the effort into learning how to use it is not to learn which knobs and switches cause the machine to emit what quantity of espresso-looking hot brown water in how many seconds. Instead, let's assume that the goal is to make espresso (and espresso-based drinks) that taste good. I'd like to make these assumptions because, if your goal is the former, I just don't see the point.
So, assuming a new home barista wants to learn how changes in technique and equipment settings influence the taste of the resulting beverage, is it easier to learn this by using good ingredients or by using stale ingredients? In my personal experience, the answer was unambiguous. Stale ingredients impeded the acquisition of this knowledge. They did not accelerate it. Good ingredients have made the part of the learning curve I've traversed thus far easy and fun.
As a result, in my opinion, by suggesting that people new to the craft of making espresso stick with ingredients that are both more expensive (in the case of the canned Illy beans you mentioned) and not fresh, you're making it more difficult for them to learn how to make good espresso. Am I missing something? How is this helpful?
Edit to add: I still consider myself more noob than expert. I just don't see how using inferior coffee could make my path easier in any way! On those occasions where I've tried it, it has been most unhelpful.