HB wrote:A couple years ago I spoke to one of the engineers at MACAP manning the booth at the SCAA conference. I asked him why they didn't make a 58mm piston for their auto-tamper. He claimed it didn't matter, that an even consistent tamp applied dead center with a 53mm piston for a 58mm basket would not improve if one used a 58mm piston. I didn't buy his argument, but said I'd give it a try (never did). Anyone with very good tamping skills and a 53mm tamper/58mm basket want to test his assertion?
Seems like a worthwhile test. I don't have a 53mm tamper, so I used my 51mm Gaggia Factory tamper. Dunno about the quality of my tamping skills.

I gave one firm level tamp with no tapping or polishing, and brushed off extra grinds with my finger before taking pix and pulling the shots.
Although I've long been an advocate for deemphasizing the importance of tamping, I expected to see some shot degradation with the smaller piston (most likely a donut extraction).
51mm piston above, 58mm belowAs luck would have it, the pictures actually captured a prettier pour from the 51mm piston. That pour was a bit too fast, on the lungo side (perhaps should have expected that). But no spritzies, donuts, or other evidence of an uneven extraction.
Granted, my Vetrano is a highly forgiving E61 machine. But I believe Ian's got it right. Grind, dose and distribution are far more important than tamp for great espresso.