www.espressoparts.com: espresso machines, grinders, brewing equipment & parts

A Tamper is Too Heavy for Grinder Anti-Popcorn Remedy - Page 6

Postby another_jim on Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:24 pm

cafeIKE wrote:Different strokes :
The frustration of single dosing four or five [actually n to 2^n depending on the remains] different coffees, never really getting to know one, is just not worth the extra prep hassle. BTDT.


I agree. I home roast, you order out. Your coffees are probably roasted better and more consistently. I get a huge variety of beans and samples coming through each year, most of which are one night stands and hate yourself in the morning beans. Some of these I roast and pull every week. I also roast a mega-dose cappa blend (50% Kenya dark, 50% Colombia or Guatemala medium). Finally I roast a few of my favorites each week.

FWIW. I put the basket on a scale which sits on the grinder fork. I adjust the grind setting, spoon in two measures of coffee, eyeballing the rough dose, grind, and then sweep the chute and pulse the grinder a few more times. I turn on the scale, and fill the basket. This all takes about 30 seconds. I spend another ten seconds flushing the Elektra and level-tamping. The doser gets cleaned out while the shot pulls. With both Elektras running, I can pull a shot a minute, of different coffees, at different doses and grind settings; with one Elektra, the delay knocking out the puck and flushing the group adds another 15 seconds or so. Not a hassle.
User avatar
another_jim
Team HB
 
Posts: 7492
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Chicago

Postby edwa on Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:28 pm

another_jim wrote:I'm not sold. ...
So if your tamper is overweighting the beans, the grind would be coarser than that of a filled hopper.


I'm not following on this one.

I've been watching as this thread became a discussion on single dose grinding vs. bean column in hopper. I, however, am guilty of using a tamper on top of a small bean column that holds maybe 5 double shots of beans not counting what's at the bottom of the throat. I liked the consistency that the weight added to the grounds thru most of the morning's pulls. However, Ian's original post made me wonder about what I maybe missing out on in terms of taste.

So. I pulled out the tamper and to get the same ristretto pull I had to tighten the grind by no less than 3 revolutions on the MXK and increase the photo enlarger timer from 9.6 to 10 seconds. So... my grind was finer with a tamper overweighing the beans.

In terms of taste I found, in my unscientific - no blind shot - way, the result to be mellower with a clearer definition of the chocolate tones. The tamper shots were sharper, sometimes with a bit of bite.

My lack of methodology will no doubt cause many a groan from the audience :wink: BUT the thread was successful enough for me to change my evil ways ... for now ... as I continue to monitor the results. In making the adjustments I've burned through my supply of Klatch Belle, so it shall be interesting to see how other beans are affected by the tamper vs. no tamper on bean column. Maybe that's what Ian should have titled the thread now that I've re-read his original post.
User avatar
edwa
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Sep 25, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

Postby RapidCoffee on Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:54 pm

edwa wrote:So. I pulled out the tamper and to get the same ristretto pull I had to tighten the grind by no less than 3 revolutions on the MXK and increase the photo enlarger timer from 9.6 to 10 seconds. So... my grind was finer with a tamper overweighing the beans.

This is in line with my observations. Unless you adjust the grind setting finer, unweighted single shot bean dosing produces blond gushers. It's not a subtle effect.

I haven't tested "overweighting" the beans (as compared to the weight of a bean column in the hopper). Forcing beans into the burr chamber with greater than normal force might produce a coarser grind, although (in light of unweighted bean results) that now seems counter-intuitive.

A related question: what is the effect of augers on grind? Kyle Glanville on the Robur E:
Grind quality is superior to even other roburs, as there is an auger driving the beans through the burr chamber at an even rate...
The Mazzer Robur-E is fast as hell. Tired of spending all your time working the doser lever or standing with the portafilter in your hand? This thing will grind 20g in less than 3 seconds!

That is more than twice as fast as my Robur (or the TGP Robur). Seems reasonable to assume there will be differences in grind as well. It would be interesting to know what is meant by "superior" grind quality...
John
User avatar
RapidCoffee
Team HB
 
Posts: 2822
Joined: Dec 11, 2005
Location: Rapid City, SD

Postby michaelbenis on Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:00 pm

Interesting, John. I reckon they mean superior in terms of more consistent/even. There is no auger on my Nino. So it relies on the beans edging their way and down in to the throat and of course they trap each other a little on the edge (I'm surmising this, they haven't told me). I reckon the difference between timed shots in the Nino is at least partially due to this, which makes the auger even more important on the E models and other GOD models.

I may not be able to resist seeing what happens if I run the Nino for single shots.....
LMWDP No. 237
User avatar
michaelbenis
 
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Location: Brighton UK

Postby another_jim on Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:33 pm

edwa wrote:I'm not following on this one. (about grinding coarser with a heavy tamper)


The less the beans popcorn, and the faster they feed, the coarser the grind setting required to get the same flow characteristics on the shot. A full hopper prevents most popcorning, so requires a coarser grind than single dosing. Even coarser grinds may perhaps be required with an augur, an extra heavy tamper, a compressor driven bean bag, or whatever else anti-popcorn jihadists and crusaders dream up. (Do I really need to put in the :wink: ?)

FWIW, I crack peppercorns with a heavy pan; beats grinding them any day. If I really out some muscle into it, and crack coffee beans instead, can I dispense with the burrs entirely?
User avatar
another_jim
Team HB
 
Posts: 7492
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Chicago

Postby cafeIKE on Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:06 pm

another_jim wrote:(Do I really need to put in the :wink: ?)

It ain't video. :roll: We can't see you grin.

Don't get me started on ceramic spice grinders :wink:
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 3014
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Postby darrensandford on Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:01 am

I read "ceramic space grinders" and thought "Wow, I need one of those!" :)
darrensandford
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Jan 27, 2008
Location: Coventry, UK

Postby michaelbenis on Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:08 am

If you ever find one, Darren, please let me know.

I want my space finer! :idea:
LMWDP No. 237
User avatar
michaelbenis
 
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Location: Brighton UK

Postby CRCasey on Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:03 am

Space the final fronter... These are the voyages of the grinder Enterprise.

:P

-C
Black as the devil, hot as hell, pure as an angel, sweet as love-CMT:LMWDP#244
User avatar
CRCasey
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Location: Lewisville, TX

Postby michaelbenis on Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:39 pm

I have so far managed to resist running the Nino for single dose, but have instead received a very tempting offer for a dosered Robur to keep the Nino company. :shock:

Can anyone tell me if it is any way feasible to think of running the dosered Robur for single dose operation, emptying the chute each time for minimal grind retention? :roll:

The (naive?) idea is to do this without the hoper, blocking the top of the grinder mouth with a 58mm tamper as I do on the SJ. This doesn't so much stop popcorning (very little on the SJ anyway) as to stop any popcorned beans from escaping if they feel that way inclined.
LMWDP No. 237
User avatar
michaelbenis
 
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Location: Brighton UK

PreviousNext

Return to Tips and Techniques