www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you

Trying lower doses using a scale - Page 2

Postby benm5678 on Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:40 pm

I think it's great you're proposing an experiment... especially when eating pucks is at stake (we'll need a video of that! ;))

cafeIKE wrote:Unless you purge a gram or two the first shot of the day will be suspect.

He mentions first shot is tossed (or wife gets it if that's what 'sorry dear' meant ;))

cafeIKE wrote:Bean aging will be a factor over two weeks

The comparison is between the 2nd and 3rd shot, so sounds like bean aging will affect them the same. Maybe also good to alternate which method is 2nd and which one is 3rd each day.

spiffdude wrote:the second with regular tamp

How do u define "regular tamp"? any distribution technique used there? or nothing and just a straight tamp (I never got that to work well).

I wonder what you'll find... I'm still chasing the best method. I agree about taste meaning the most.... but for me, a naked PF certainly helps understand what's happening... and also easier to use and keep clean.
User avatar
benm5678
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Location: earth

Postby spiffdude on Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:16 pm

I load the hopper with enough beans for a couple of days. I measure the weight of ground coffee in the basket (scale tared to the weight of said basket).

After each session, the chute and doser get a complete sweeping. Once every two of three days i vacuum these areas.

The first shot will be indeed be used for the wife's latte, honestly, unless i really screw it up, it's ok for that purpose. 2nd and 3rd shot should be more representative and will be used for my "test".

Since i intend to try both methods every day, aging will affect the shots the same way, that is what i meant by aging not being a factor (instead of doing nutation the first week and non nutation the second on the same batch of beans).

About the non nutated pull... i was thinking about simply tamping down the pile at level. Ben you said this does not work out for you, i agree it also has me worried. But if i do some type of distribution, i should do it to both baskets to eliminate that factor... I had though about doing a WDT but then i'd have to do it in both baskets. Also adding extra steps increases the chance of operator errors.

Please bear with me, this test might take me a while since i usually only pull shots in the morning before the day starts. I have little time as it is, if i start using up my evenings for coffee testing, my brownie points will take a serious hit.
Damn this forum, I've had too m..muh...mah..mmmm..much caffeine!
User avatar
spiffdude
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada
www.baratza.com: skilled in the art of grinding
www.baratza.com: skilled in the art of grinding

Postby spiffdude on Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:17 pm

I've just realized this is getting of topic, should i start another thread?
Damn this forum, I've had too m..muh...mah..mmmm..much caffeine!
User avatar
spiffdude
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada

Postby cafeIKE on Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:31 am

Topic :?: We don' need no stinking topic :!:

spiffdude wrote:aging will affect the shots the same way

If you don't compensate as the beans age, the shots may suffer to the end of the test. Since I expect you'd like to taste them, you may need to adjust the dose up a bit toward the end. Possibly a tad coarser as well.

You should use the same distribution method on both shots. I normally distribute with a gentle side to side shake that I learned before the Internet was invented and nutation makes zero difference.

EDIT : use a coin toss to determine which shot to nutate
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 3014
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Postby HB on Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:10 pm

spiffdude wrote:I've just realized this is getting of topic, should i start another thread?

For a short side discussion, it's not worth the trouble. But if you anticipate more than 3-4 posts will result and they don't fit the current topic, then create a new topic. When in doubt, I create a new topic because well-focused topics tend to result in well-focused discussion; vague topics typically meander in text-messaging like fashion until the participants get bored with it, leaving search-unfriendly blather behind.

The standard reminder blurb shown to new members is "Please choose the title of your topic carefully. Topics with well-chosen titles receive faster responses from a greater percentage of the community. It also increases the likelihood that visitors will find the information they seek, which reduces the number of repeat questions."

At the risk of dragging this thread off topic, the subject of this thread is not search-friendly. It only has one keyword of any value ("scale"). You could substitute anything for "scale" and have the same vagueness (e.g., "A little help with a grinder..." only has one keyword). Ironically, re-reading the first post, this topic has very little to do with scales at all. It's really about lower doses. So, for example, a search-friendly subject would have been "Tried lower doses and espresso is worse than before".
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 13173
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Postby spiffdude on Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:24 pm

Thanks Dan, will start a new topic in this case. Makes sense.
Damn this forum, I've had too m..muh...mah..mmmm..much caffeine!
User avatar
spiffdude
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada

Postby cafeIKE on Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:46 pm

I think you as topic creator can edit the first post and change the topic
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 3014
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Previous

Return to Tips and Techniques