another_jim wrote:Actually, the more head space between the top of the puck and the shower scren, the less channeling and the longer the delay from pump start to first drops (on machines with no explicit preinfusion mechanism).
In fact, the easiest, and perhaps the best, way to get preinfusion is to either dose less or use a deeper basket.
This makes sense. The extra headspace acts as a preinfusion chamber that must fill entirely before the full pressure of the pump is exerted on the coffee bed.
Since this is something I have the means to try, I went and pulled a regular double dose into a triple basket. I normally don't down dose a basket that much because it makes for a slightly messier cleanup in my experience. But the resulting shot was very nice. The pour was even with only a slightly faster start at the edges.
RapidCoffee wrote:Try it yourself. I predict a soupy liquid of watery grinds will overflow your portafilter before any appreciable preinfusion takes place.
Did you actually pull the shot?
I initially ranked this suggestion up there with welding oil, a bag of post holes, a board stretcher, and blinker fluid. Despite my better judgment and with total lack of regard for public ridicule I went ahead and tried it. Not surprising was the accuracy of you prediction about the mess. This was extra messy and only a silly home barista would even consider it. Lucky for me I have been known to be silly on occasion. I was surprised at the result. I prepped the basket then held it under the dispersion screen, just outside of the bayonet ring. I added enough water to fill half the empty space in the basket, maybe .5 ounces or less probably more like .25. I counted to 5, but I did not notice any significant water absorption. I then locked it in, flinched at the resulting overflow, and activated the pump. The resulting pour began very evenly across the surface of the basket with nice color and flow. I did notice the flow seemed a little faster than the previous shot. The actual pump time was only about 23 seconds instead of the normal ~30. I am guessing this is due to the prewetting of the puck, even though I was not able to perceive any absorption. In either case the shot was fine, for lack of better descriptors. It was messy and resulted in a beautiful pour but the resulting puck was the worst I have ever seen.
This was fun and surprising but it is not something I will be doing as a regular preparation step. Maybe I will do a couple more experiments, just to see if there is any consistent result, other than being consistently messy.