Digital espresso or a way to consistency - Page 6

Beginner or pro barista, all are invited to share.
User avatar
cannonfodder
Team HB
Posts: 8060
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:20 am
Real Name: Dave Stephens
Equipment: Elektra A3, Faema, Gaggia Lever, LaCimbali the list goes on...
Location: Downingtown PA

Postby cannonfodder » Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:02 am

So after 5 pages of debate, what does all this boil down to? If you are unhappy with your espresso, try using a scale to improve your consistency. If you are happy with your espresso, dont worry about it and drink up.
Dave Stephens

User avatar
Martin
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:51 pm
Real Name: Martin
Equipment: Dalla Corte Mini; HG One; MM doserless; Vario; Heatgun/Dogbowl
Location: Santa Fe, NM

Postby Martin » Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:28 am

cannonfodder wrote:So after 5 pages of debate, what does all this boil down to? If you are unhappy with your espresso, try using a scale to improve your consistency. If you are happy with your espresso, dont worry about it and drink up.

IMO, it's much more fun to worry about something when I'm happy about it than when it's driving me nuts. :D
Anyway, put this thread to some practical use. How does it translate in terms of grinder purchase decision making (and subsequent use) when advising newbies"? Does it tilt the balance toward pre-grind per-shot weighing? Avoid using clacker dosers and timers. If pulling under x# shots per day, avoid machines that trap residual grounds that need removal.

That's the advice I recently gave, but I'm willing to go back with a deep, humiliating apology and correction.

quality & service, second to none
Ken Fox
Posts: 2453
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:12 pm
Real Name: Ken Fox
Equipment: Too much
Location: Idaho

Postby Ken Fox » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:31 am

Martin wrote:Anyway, put this thread to some practical use. How does it translate in terms of grinder purchase decision making (and subsequent use) when advising newbies"? Does it tilt the balance toward pre-grind per-shot weighing? Avoid using clacker dosers and timers. If pulling under x# shots per day, avoid machines that trap residual grounds that need removal.

That's the advice I recently gave, but I'm willing to go back with a deep, humiliating apology and correction.


If you want more consistent results, get a Titan-level grinder and use it in a consistent manner. These grinders are much more forgiving when it comes to dose variation and in the need for minor grind setting adjustments.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955

zin1953
Posts: 2529
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 2:17 pm
Real Name: Jason Brandt Lewis
Equipment: Elektra T1-La Valentina-Olympia Cafferex-Mahlkönig K30 Vario-Cimbali MaxHybrid-Baratza Vario
Location: Berkeley, CA USA

Postby zin1953 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:55 am

Religion, art, politics -- whatever . . .

My espresso at home is quite consistent, and so I'm perfectly happy with what I'm making at home, and that's that. (What my 16-year old daughter makes is another issue.) :lol:

What I expect from a café/"professional" barista is something else again . . . Clearly from a *$ the answer vis-a-vis expectation is "not much." So, too, from other chains and no-name corner shops opened because the profit margins seemed HUGE . . .

On the other hand, when I go into a place like Ritual in San Francisco, Intelly in Silverlake or Pasadena, Vivace in Seattle, and similar places that probably all of us could name, my expectations are higher, AND I've not been disappointed . . . but since I am not a "regular" at any of these establishments, I cannot realistically comment on their consistency shot-after-shot, barista-after-barista . . .

Cheers,
Jason
A morning without coffee is sleep. -- Anon.

User avatar
Marshall
Posts: 2738
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 5:00 pm
Real Name: Marshall Fuss
Equipment: LM GS/3 MP; Mahlkonig K30 Vario; Bonavita Dripper; Mahlkonig ProM
Location: Los Angeles, California

Postby Marshall » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:59 pm

cannonfodder wrote:So after 5 pages of debate, what does all this boil down to? If you are unhappy with your espresso, try using a scale to improve your consistency. If you are happy with your espresso, dont worry about it and drink up.

+1
Marshall
Los Angeles

User avatar
tekomino
Posts: 1120
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:30 pm
Real Name: dennis
Equipment: Eh, who knows...
Location: Seattle

Postby tekomino » Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:38 am

"Adapt what is useful, reject what is useless, and add what is specifically your own."
— Bruce Lee
Refuse to wing it! http://10000shots.com

mini
Posts: 229
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:05 am
Real Name: Matt McCurley
Equipment: Super Jolly, Le'lit PL041
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby mini » Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:13 pm

What, are we all going to group hug now? :P I appreciate that this forum can settle different positions with relative civility. I do propose that we look into an internal competition, though. How interesting would it be to "play for keeps" and have a heads up, shot - shot, best of 5 aimed at determining inventive home techniques? It would be tons of fun to taste some of Dennis' shots compared to the best that I can do on home equipment. It's too bad that so many of us are so spread out. "World Home Barista Championship?"

More related to the topic at hand, I have a question. I do weigh all of my doses, but I don't really like doing it in the middle of my routine. I'd much rather weigh all the doses for the day ahead of time and have them ready to quickly dump into my grinder, similar to the video mentioned earlier. Does anyone else do this, and what vessel do you use?
matt

User avatar
Bob_McBob
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:12 pm
Real Name: Chris Birkett
Equipment: Yes
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada

Postby Bob_McBob » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:08 pm

cannonfodder wrote:So after 5 pages of debate, what does all this boil down to? If you are unhappy with your espresso, try using a scale to improve your consistency. If you are happy with your espresso, dont worry about it and drink up.


I don't think that's what it boils down to at all. We're not weighing doses and shots because we're unhappy, we're doing it because it makes better espresso.
Chris

User avatar
AndyS
Posts: 1059
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 11:29 pm
Real Name: Andy Schecter
Equipment: 'Spro: Speedster, Silvia, Schectermatic Profiling Pump; Grinder: Robur, M3; Extractmojo
Location: NY

Postby AndyS » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:21 am

I am replying very late to this thread, and probably most of you have lost interest after six pages of (as Ken says) "religious" argument. But I'd still like to comment.

The long version of what I have to say is on portafilter.net. Here's a shorter version:

To me, weighing espresso is very important when you are communicating about your espresso to others. By weighing the dose and weighing the beverage, you can accurately describe the kind of shot you are pulling to people who may live thousands of miles away from you.

This point was emphasized to me in a two recent email conversations. Ken Fox and I were talking about weighing shots. He replied that his doses were mostly in the 14.5 to 15g range, and the shots weighed from 9.8g to 14.5g. This surprised me, because although I knew Ken was a low doser, I didn't know he was a ristretto puller, too. If he ever sends me more samples of his coffee roasts, I will start out pulling them in a ristretto style. When he previously has sent me coffee, I have pulled it more lungo. Doing it ristretto instead, I will be more likely to "get" what he's trying to do with his roasting.

Another friend told me of his visit to a famous espresso machine factory in Italy. In their testing lab he measured their doses at 14-17g and the beverage weights at 54-60g! That really surprised me; I can't imagine pulling good shots that long with the beans I use and my setup. Sometime I'll get some decent Italian espresso beans, lower my boiler temp, and try it out.

An additional reason to weigh shots was pointed out in a pretty brilliant post by James Hoffmann. Read it for yourself, but the gist of it is, you can often dial in an espresso by sticking with a fixed brewing ratio (in James' case, dose g/beverage g = 65%) and adjusting grind to taste. Irish barista champ Colin Harmon made a similar observation on his blog.

Like many other commenters on this thread, I don't think one should be in the habit of pulling every shot on a scale and stopping the pump on every shot based on weight. It is very valuable, IMO, to develop one's skill in assessing the flow rate, texture and color of the espresso stream and ending the shot based on those cues. If you're always watching the scale rather than the stream, you don't develop that skill.

So each technique has its place. To the extent that we can leave the religion out of it, I believe we can help ourselves and each other to make better espresso.
-AndyS
VST refractometer/filter basket beta tester, no financial interest in the company

User avatar
jammin
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:46 am
Real Name: Jackson
Equipment: Quest
Location: Boise

Postby jammin » Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:34 am

Andy,

Great post! I was hoping you would weigh in on this lol;) Seriously though, you make some great points. I think one of the greatest things about checking your brew ratios is that it allows you to recreate shots that you enjoyed. All one has to do is know the dose you were using, brew temp and beverage weight.

~j