AndyS wrote:Others may disagree, but I feel there is ZERO correlation between the firmness of the puck and the quality of the shot.
I agree. Signs of egregious channeling may be revealed by examining the puck. Personally I rank puckology on the bottom rung of useful diagnostic metrics. FWIW, the SCAA barista competition technical judges do check the firmness of the puck, but only for consistency shot-to-shot. That is, if they see a soupy puck one time, a moist puck, and a ultra firm puck later, they'll mark off points for inconsistency. But if the barista pulled shots all with soupy/moist/ultra firm pucks every time, they're good to go.
Technical judges puck checks (from SCAA Barista Competition - USBC 2007)




