zin1953 wrote:Danger! Danger! Warning, Will Robinson! Boring philosophical thread drift ahead!
Far be it for me to be a contrarian, but . . .
Let's make vast over-generalizations and -simplifications for a moment and proclaim there are only three types of people on this site: lurkers and true newbies, true experts and/or professionals, and the rest of us -- who possess varying degrees of experience ranging from a "10" to a "90" on some mythical scale; with the lurkers being a 0-10, and the pros being 90-100. (This is a variation on the famed "80-10-10 Rule.")
It often seems to me that, in terms of importance, the "Four M's" are typically listed in reverse order of importance: rather than Macchina espresso (machine), Macinadosatore (grinder), Miscela (blend of coffee beans), and Mano dell'operatore (us -- the people who pull the shots), it should be the other way 'round. And yet, it is that order which dominates the discussion . . .
Thus, it is distinctly, possible if not probable, that many new people to espresso focus too much on the equipment and not enough on the coffee itself and upon the technique . . . that's all I'm really saying here.
Cheers,
Jason
That's because it's dead easy to do something about your equipment and grinder (provided you've got a credit card with enough available), simple to do something about the beans (find a new place to get 'em from), but hard to work on your skills, 'cause it's, ya know, actual work. I see this constantly in my other life as a musician, where I know people who spend thousands on collecting nicer and nicer guitars, but never spend a cent on improving their actual facility on the instrument in question. It's all too easy to get hung up on the stuff that's easiest to do something about. Doing the hard stuff first? That's the sign of a real pro.