t3steve wrote:Let me try to re-state what I have already said.
I can set the grinder and manually operate the espresso machine to dispense a good tasting 2oz espresso in 25-30sec using a 30lb tamp pressure.
Dan Kehn says in his review of La Cimbali Junior DT1 that "set the volumetric dose to 90ml or 3oz to get a 2oz shot (note the extra 30 milliliters above the volume of a standard double accounts for the water absorbed by the puck and the space above the dispersion screen)".
When the grind is too coarse and a 2oz shot is dispensed in 15-20sec then the 90ml water volumetric dose is correct.
When the correct grind is used as determined in the first step above the, water volumetric dose required is around 4 to 4.25oz to get a 2oz espresso.
Now if the extra 30 milliliters above the volume of a standard double accounts for the water absorbed by the puck and the space above the dispersion screen) does not change the extra 1oz of water must go somewhere right?
Steve
I don't question the conclusion that excess water, if there is any, must be going or staying somewhere if it doesn't show up in the cup. But I have three questions; sorry if they're very basic; when troubleshooting remotely it's best never to assume:
1. Are you certain that the 4oz setting is actually dispensing 4oz gross? You've measured this?
2. How do you know the gross water volume required for 2oz net when operating the machine
manually? You are using temporal-units for manual mode and volume-units for auto mode.
3. Are you certain that your coffee dose and tamp are consistent when comparing manual to auto mode?
With respect to #3: I'm suggesting that you remove one variable from the comparsion (compaction) just to make sure that the additional ounce+ of water (vis-a-vis Dan's review) that your machine is alleged to require

is not the result of the coffee being too densely compacted and/or overdosed. When comparing manual to auto mode be certain to get the dose the same. It doesn't take much difference to make a difference.