www.ptscoffee.com: without the love, it's just coffee

Posting Style

Postby Ken Fox on Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:21 am

...split from Strange noise coming from my Andreja Premium, 5 months old by moderator...



HB wrote:Am I the only one who's weirded out by three similar responses within three minutes of each other? :shock: :lol:


this occurred because nearly all of the intelligent people have migrated over to your website, Dan. Had this been posted on alt.coffee, there would have been 3 responses, 2 of which would have been self-promotional sales pitches for a PID'd Silvia, from the same person using two different posting identities, and the third one would have been someone complaining about the two preceding posts.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Postby SJM on Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:40 pm

Ken Fox wrote:this occurred because nearly all of the intelligent people have migrated over to your website, Dan.


I know, I know, I should leave this alone, but as a person who finds useful information on multiple coffee sites, I found this insulting.

And beneath the same dignity that is being attributed to the forum.

Rant over.
Heading to the sink to wash mouth out with soap.

Susan
SJM
 
Posts: 146
Joined: May 17, 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, California
www.ptscoffee.com: without the love, it's just coffee
www.ptscoffee.com: without the love, it's just coffee

Postby Ken Fox on Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:09 pm

SJM wrote:I know, I know, I should leave this alone, but as a person who finds useful information on multiple coffee sites, I found this insulting.

And beneath the same dignity that is being attributed to the forum.

Rant over.
Heading to the sink to wash mouth out with soap.

Susan


With all due respect, the great bulk of the intellectually interesting posts and threads on the english language coffee boards are right here on home-barista.com

Sure, you can find some posts by people with well known names on another site, but their posts don't tend to be very deep or impart much knowledge; they certainly do not explore new things or do any original research, something one finds here nearly every week.

And, without meaning to be personal, I think one has to make some significant contributions, to make an effort beyond chatty posts, to have a comment such as yours taken seriously. At least that is true, for me.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Postby SJM on Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:20 pm

Ken Fox wrote:And, without meaning to be personal, I think one has to make some significant contributions, to make an effort beyond chatty posts, to have a comment such as yours taken seriously. At least that is true, for me.

ken


OUCH !
Yup, shoulda left it alone.

Susan
SJM
 
Posts: 146
Joined: May 17, 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, California

Postby Ken Fox on Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:55 pm

SJM wrote:OUCH !
Yup, shoulda left it alone.

Susan


I'm well aware that I have a posting style that is sometimes interpreted as abrasive. At the same time, I spend a lot of time doing original research about which I actually post here, unlike some very brainy participants here who often keep their results to themselves. Like some others here, I also spend a lot of time answering questions, which takes a lot of time and I'd like to think helps at least some people.

I am not compensated for this in any way and have no position of authority other than for chief-splinter-in-the-a** of one Dan Kehn, as he slides down the banister of life :mrgreen:

I guess I just don't have much patience for posts having to deal with posting style, when the posting style is not intentionally or obviously offensive.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Postby HB on Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:08 pm

SJM wrote:I know, I know, I should leave this alone, but as a person who finds useful information on multiple coffee sites, I found this insulting.

To provide a bit of background, Ken is a long-time alt.coffee participant. As an unmoderated newsgroup, it's had its share of spammers and trolls. This thread reminds of the section entitled Translating the Elements of Good Communities from the Offline to the OnlineWorld of the chapter Scaling Gracefully:

Despite applying the preceding tricks, it is always possible for growth in a community to outstrip an old user's ability to cope with all the new users and their contributions. Every Internet collaboration system going back to the early 1970s has drawn complaints of the form "I used to like this [mailing list|newsgroup|MUD|Web community] when it was smaller, but now it is big and full of flaming losers; the interesting thoughtful material is buried under a heavy layer of dross." The earliest technological fix for this complaint was the bozo filter. If you didn't like what someone had to say, you added them to your bozo list and the software would hide their contributions from your view of the community.

The combined factors of a given site's focus and its place in the community development lifecycle have an effect on the tone of the discourse. I find these distinctions neither good or bad, just "different." HB narrowly focuses on the "espresso fanatic"; sites like CoffeeGeek focus on the interests of a very broad audience; TooMuchCoffee focuses on its regional audience (i.e., only those in Europe can join); Coffeed focuses on professional interests and its membership is by invitation only. While I naturally prefer HB (surprise, surprise), I value participation in other venues as my time allows. In other words, I believe that choice is good.

Ken Fox wrote:I'm well aware that I have a posting style that is sometimes interpreted as abrasive.... I guess I just don't have much patience for posts having to deal with posting style, when the posting style is not intentionally or obviously offensive.

Ken has his curmudgeonly moments, but it's a small price to pay for the effort he puts toward helping others through his research and forum contributions. Were that not the case, I'm sure he'd be banned from just about any site within a few months. :P
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 12672
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Postby Ken Fox on Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:06 pm

quite a way to kill a discussion, splitting it off to a forum that no one ever reads. That's such a good idea, I'm surprised I didn't think of it first.
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Postby another_jim on Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:04 pm

Hi Susan,

Nice to see you here.

A bit of history: Until 2004, the only coffee forum was the alt.coffee news group, which had a relatively small core membership (i.e. people posting several times per week). These people knew and mostly respected each other, so that they occasionally telling one another that a post of theirs was ignorant, wrong or perverse didn't do much harm. Newbies asking questions were given rude but informative answers. If they had a thick skin and were enthusiasts, they stayed on; if they were missing one of these, they left.

CG and many of the Non US net fora opened in 2004 and 2005. They were to be kinder and gentler places were newbies got a friendly welcome. Mark got a lot of flak from other alt.coffee members for doing this; but it was clear that the day of newsgroups was passing -- new internet people simply didn't know gopher, news groups, ftp or anything else except the www existed. I, as one of the early moderators, was all for this, although frequently grumbling privately that I'm not the answer desk (I even got some angry emails from people when I became brusque, telling me I wasn't worth my salary).

Within a few years, it became clear that my grumbling was emblematic of many of the old timers feelings. There is always idle chatter on fora. It is fun if you know the people, and boring if you don't. With the membership exploding, the chatter by unknowns became overwhelming and tedious. Good user filters, like are found on newsgroup software, would help for this.

But the real problem is more serious. Newbies need to learn how to use a forum, and being ultra nice to them all the time doesn't accomplish this. There was an explosion of questions that had been answered correctly hundreds of times before posed by people unaware that it is mandatory to do a search before posting questions. Obviously, the experienced people just stopped answering.

This was the second big mistake. When experienced people stopped answering, people who knew nothing did. After a year of this, CG has become very much compromised as an information archive. A search will produce as many answers by people who don't know what they are talking about as people who do. So now it's pointless for newbies to do a search before asking a question, since they won't get a trustworthy answer. Historical note for non alt.coffee people: the regulars on alt.coffee thought the most valuable part of it was the archived posts that could be searched for good answers on most questions. This is what CG has now lost, perhaps irretrievably so.

This has led to the exodus of most of the experienced posters. HB has become their home, along with alt.coffee die hards finally tearing themselves away from the grave site, like Randy. HB has, ironically, become a bit of a reunion of alt.coffee regulars from 4 years ago. Of course, there are even more new enthusiasts, either home grown, or from CG's more exciting days.

Ken's being less than kind and gentle is a service to the community (granted it's one that he probably enjoys), since it cuts down on idle questions, and even more importantly, on idle answers.
User avatar
another_jim
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Chicago

Postby jesawdy on Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:31 pm

HB wrote:Were that not the case, I'm sure he'd be banned from just about any site within a few months. :P

Ha! I actually laughed out loud. Some of us read to just to see what Ken will say next. It's part of the fun.

Ken Fox wrote:quite a way to kill a discussion, splitting it off to a forum that no one ever reads. That's such a good idea, I'm surprised I didn't think of it first.

I don't think it's dead yet.

FWIW, I *think* Susan is one of the new Moderators on CG, which might explain her initial offense (corrections welcomed).

When I get hot and bothered by an e-mail or a post, I try to resist the temptation to immediately respond and cool off for about 30 minutes or so and still see if it still bothers me. Usually, it does not. Works for me most of the time.
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Postby HB on Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:38 pm

Thanks Jim, a great insight into alt.coffee history and the influence of web-based forums.

another_jim wrote:But the real problem is more serious. Newbies need to learn how to use a forum, and being ultra nice to them all the time doesn't accomplish this. There was an explosion of questions that had been answered correctly hundreds of times before posed by people unaware that it is mandatory to do a search before posting questions. Obviously, the
experienced people just stopped answering.

This issue has been a real struggle: How to handle answering the already asked question for the 100th time?

My strategy is posting links to previous discussions, referencing the FAQs, and sometimes merging the repeated question into the previous incantation with a marker "...merged with existing thread on same topic..." The keys to retaining my sanity while doing this sort of bookkeeping are (a) recognizing that resurfacing old discussions frequently leads to new insights, and (b) using my reply referencing previous discussions as an opportunity to draw them together or elaborate on a point that may not have been raised before.

(As an aside, this is one of the reasons the site search is optimized for blazing fast performance -- I'm probably the #1 user of it!).

Ken complains that I buried his thread in this forum by splitting it off. However, I'm always thinking of the reference value of a given topic; wide excursions to another unrelated subject, as was the case for this thread, dilutes the value of the original thread. Often a thoughtful split will spurn an entirely new level of interest in the second topic. It's a handy tool for building on a discussion, if used sparingly.

jesawdy wrote:FWIW, I *think* Susan is one of the new Moderators on CG, which might explain her initial offense (corrections welcomed).

Partially correct. Susan tried it and decided it wasn't her thing (Decision to Change Status explains why).
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 12672
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Next

Return to News and Suggestion Box