ntwkgestapo wrote:Greg, I KNEW there was a reason (other than espresso!

) that I liked you! Super-V! Amazing cars towards the end of the series! as complex as any CART/USAC/F-1 car as far as the aerodynamics, chassis and suspension... Just not as powerful (alto they got a LOT out of those 1.6 liter engines!)...
Yeah they were pretty cool cars for their time. We used to run Ralts (RT1 in '78-80 and RT5 from 80 to 84). At the time, we were the Schrick Engines agent for the US, and I did our engine development program and serviced all of the customer motors as well. We got around 190 hp from 1.6L at 8800 RPM, depending on the particular cam, intake trumpet, exhaust combination, which isn't all that much in terms of specific power output, but it's pretty phenomenal for motors that ran restricted intake port diameters (rule imposed) and gasoline as fuel with no turbo. We ran different systems for oval tracks and road course, with the oval motors winding a bit higher with a narrower power band. Minimum weight for a Super V was just under 950 lbs, as I recall, which meant that the cars power to weight ratio was 5 lbs per hp. That's about like having a Volkswagen GTI with 650 horsepower, but with waaay less frontal area. A Super V was faster in a straight line than a Formula Atlantic car because it had so little tire by comparison, so a Super Vee was really quick in places that put a premium on acceleration and top end. Our average speed around Michigan International Speedway was over 175 mph. At some places, like Milwaukee, pole time for a Super Vee would have been 6th or 7th on the Indy Car grid. Milwaukee was a special case because so much of getting around Milwaukee involves having good grip and aerodynamics, since the corners are so flat and relatively fast. Distance down the front and back straight there is too short for the horsepower difference (around 1000 vs 190) to offset light weight, mechanical grip and aerodynamic downforce.
Things are really different now in motor racing, but they're still the same in a lot of ways. Nowadays telemetry systems and on-car sensors / diagnostics make it much easier to get performance data and set up the car for a specific circuit. Cars are a whole lot safer and more sophisticated. but in the end you still gotta have good preparation, dedication to the sport and a shoe who ain't afraid to put the hammer down and go racing.
I miss a lot of things about professional motor racing and I often think that I should have stayed in it because I was pretty good at it. I really liked the intensity, the simplicity of purpose, and the cleansing nature of having complete focus on one thing - winning motor races. I really liked the pursuit of perfection in all parts of the effort. I also liked living on the road and the fact that all of my friends were at the same race track in a different part of the world every couple of weeks. I don't miss the work schedule though, and I don't miss fixing crash damage or otherwise getting behind at the race track when something went wrong. I still have friends in the business and it's really funny how I run into racers and ex-racers at odd times. John Blackwell from ESI and his brother still race Atlantic cars. It turns out that we know a lot of the same people. I've met a lot of folks in sailboat racing that used to be car racers. Once a racer always a racer I guess.
-Greg (who once said: "Who wants a house! You can't race one of those!) Scace