OCD - ONA Coffee Distributor (tool for coffee in the portafilter basket) - Page 3

Want to talk espresso but not sure which forum? If so, this is the right one.
User avatar
baldheadracing (original poster)
Team HB
Posts: 6289
Joined: 9 years ago

#21: Post by baldheadracing (original poster) »

So I got mine today. It is a heavy thing - about 410g. Depth is adjustable.

To see if the thing works, I used 12g in a VST15 basket and my Silvia. When I use this low dose, it seems that everything has to be just right for a spritz-less naked extraction. Coffee was a Peru, taken to the start of 2nd crack, 10 days post-roast.

My normal shot prep routine is to shake the grounds out of the Pharos into a small cup, dump the grounds into the portafilter, distribute using a cocktail whisk in a spirograph pattern, followed by one OE-style slap shot, and then tamp.

I used my normal routine to dial the Pharos in to give 22g out in 30 seconds (1:1.8 BR, 19.8% EY). I then repeated the pull substituting the OCD right out-of-the-box for the whisk and slap shot. Using the OCD at this depth resulted in very little compression during tamping - maybe a couple mm. 23g in 30 seconds (1:1.9 BR, 20.4% EY). So, pretty much the same result.

OCD comes with a couple spacers installed, so I tried again with no spacers (so more puck compression during tamping) and one spacer. The results were worse, i.e., the more puck compression that was done by the tamper, the lower the EY (and the more sour the espresso, but tasting was not blind).

So OCD seems to be doing something, at least in the above situation. I have no idea what - it could very well be simply compensating for the handle side of the portafilter :) .
-"Good quality brings happiness as you use it" - Nobuho Miya, Kamasada

User avatar
baldheadracing (original poster)
Team HB
Posts: 6289
Joined: 9 years ago

#22: Post by baldheadracing (original poster) »

LOL! So far I have found that setting the right depth is key. Too little depth gives a result that looks good but doesn't give a nice start to the extraction. (I am always dosing the basket unevenly so the OCD has to do something, and looking for the naked extraction to start at the same time everywhere across the basket.) I'll eventually design an experiment to see if there is a (statistical) difference in extraction yield between OCD and my WDT-like stirring.
-"Good quality brings happiness as you use it" - Nobuho Miya, Kamasada

Advertisement
User avatar
Fausto
Posts: 452
Joined: 9 years ago

#23: Post by Fausto »

Just letting people know that you can now buy this stateside from BrewGlobal for $110 - http://brewglobal.com/ocd-coffee-distribution-tool.html

Haven't ruled it out yet, I'm currently LOVING my new Eazytamp 5 star pro. Not sure this will really make much of a difference.

Currently I grind into my blind tumbler, WDT with cocktail wisk, then I put an OE dosing funnel on my portafilter with the blind tumbler on top of it, then I pull the tumbler plug out, tap it a few times, then I shake the portafilter with dosing funnel back and forth a few times to even out the coffee bed - this works well, but this is where the O.C.D. could maybe take over? So now I have an even fluffy WDT'd coffee bed, then I use my 58.4mm Eazytamp. Results have been pretty perfect. Anyway, it takes longer to write then it does to actually do any of this, after I finish grinding, I'm activating the pump about a minute later.

User avatar
baldheadracing (original poster)
Team HB
Posts: 6289
Joined: 9 years ago

#24: Post by baldheadracing (original poster) »

If you are happy with your workflow, then I don't see a need for you to get an OCD. OCD is for a two- or three-step workflow: grind into portafilter, OCD, and, depending on headspace needed & other factors, tamp.

As an aside, when I had my HG-one, I never used the blind tumbler. My workflow was: grind into portafilter with funnel, cocktail whisk Spirograph of grounds, one downwards thwack, tamp, funnel off. (Reverse the last two steps for an OE funnel.)
-"Good quality brings happiness as you use it" - Nobuho Miya, Kamasada

wurf209
Posts: 17
Joined: 8 years ago

#25: Post by wurf209 »

http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blog ... rom=search

found a review from korean blog. Even if you don't understand korean I think the pictures tells the whole story. The look of the puck after brewing look near perfect... This plus Push tamper would nearly eliminate any channeling due to barista's skill level.

Zoey
Posts: 176
Joined: 8 years ago

#26: Post by Zoey »

Thanks for the link. Mine should be here on Wednesday.

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22031
Joined: 19 years ago

#27: Post by HB »

Posts in this thread were reported per the site's terms of service:
Terms of Service wrote:It is not the policy of Home-Barista.com to read and vet posts written by its members. However, if you believe your copyrights are being violated, or you are being libeled, abused or offended, use the "Report a post" button of the offending post. A moderator will then read the post and remove those which violate law or board policy.
While members are certainly welcome and encouraged to discuss/share their original 3-D work, we ask members to respect others' intellectual property. I've removed the posts about creating and sharing a 3-D printing of an ONA Coffee Distributor replica.
Dan Kehn

Advertisement
Dyrlaegen
Posts: 17
Joined: 11 years ago

#28: Post by Dyrlaegen »

HI Dan - It is quite fair. I just wanted to give people the opportunity to try the concept before they invested a lot of money on this tool. I do not in any way see the 3D printed as a real alternative to the steel version, who wants to use light weight plastic (<15 gram) in their everyday routine :wink: So for those who managed to download the model yesterday, buy the real version, if you like plastic version :)

I have removed the model from Thingiverse again.

wurf209
Posts: 17
Joined: 8 years ago

#29: Post by wurf209 »

I don't understand. That's not how copyright works. Copyright protect the product itself; not the idea of it. That's for patent. OCD is not patented anywhere(I don't even think it's patentable) therefore ONA doesn't 'own' any idea, or mechanism behind OCD. Dyrlaegen's design is definitely inspired by OCD's design, however it's his original and it does not infringe any intellectual property ONA have.

Wacevedo
Posts: 9
Joined: 10 years ago

#30: Post by Wacevedo »

Is this tool only available for 58mm portafilter?