by peacecup on Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:13 am
It's a question of semantics, but the question (and the HB sub-title) ought to be exceptionally good, since exceptional simply means very much different. I assume few of us want to brew exceptionally bad espresso for example. That said, it's much easier to recognize exceptionally bad espresso - and simply not drink it.
A lot of the very experienced people here seem to seek out varieties of espresso, single-origin beans, etc.. I assume that's because they have highly-developed palates, and can distinguish subtle flavor nuances that would be lost to me. On the other hand, there are probably a lot of people who crave variety for variety's sake, and wish to change coffees frequently. The point here is that tasting a lot of different coffees, blends, brewing techniques, will lead to exceptional experiences, good and bad. Because taste is subjective, one man's good could be another man's bad, although again, I suppose that experienced tasters might tend to agree on which is which.
What am I saying? That exceptionally bad is easily recognized, and that it is probably easier to agree on, that is exceptionally good. (also that I'm only qualified to judge the former).
I'm less certain about this idea that once exceptional becomes ordinary I am settling for ordinary. This implies that I need to continually seek new flavors, and this is not my cup of tea (or espresso). For my taste, once I've found something I think is exceptionally good, it continues to be exceptionally good as long as I keep enjoying it.
PC
LMWDP #049
Hand-ground, hand-pulled: "hands down.."