Laral wrote:@Psyd:
Excuse me for asking er, uh, "big bro'", but where are you reading all this into that quote? I see no mention of motor size in the entire article to that point.
The very fact that all of those primary and secondary controllers, branch feeders, overload, adjustable speed drive, and a whole buncha experience getting schooled by folk who are involved in writing the NEC on a regular basis.
'Hyperbole'? I'm not exactly sure what part of my post you thought was exaggerated, but I'm fairly direct about the NEC and that particular quote. A lot of the detail I went into was to indicate that the language used in the NEC isn't always the same and parallel to the language that we use on the street. A 'disconnect' and a 'connector' aren't the same to Joe Lunchpail as they are to the Framers of the NEC.
Understanding their lexicon makes quite a few things that they say much clearer. Even with the exposure I get from those involved in the drafting of the document, and the exposure I get from working in close proximity with electricians fairly frequently, I still have trouble following some of the descriptions and instructions. So, when I try to describe them, I try to get the details as accurate as I can, and that takes a lot of words.
But hardly hyperbolic.
Section 430 of chapter 4 could refer to the SJ motor, but then you'd have to have some mechanism that would not let you disconnect the ground or the neutral until the hot had been disconnected.




