by mrgnomer on Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:03 pm
My iRoast2 hung in there for about 2 years, 400 roasts. I often roasted 3-5 batches in a day towards the end of it's useful life. That could have killed it.
It took a while to get to know the roaster and roasting. After the first year my roasts were very good. It took research, observation, experimentation and logging but my best iRoast roasts were as good as or better than any local commercial roaster. Absolutely you can improve your coffee with an iRoast. My first good roast, an Ethiopian Harrar, blew me away. Fresh blueberries. I'd never tasted anything so fresh or distinct in a drip before. You never can capture that incredible first taste experience, I don't think, but I've been chasing it ever since.
If you want longevity the iRoast I don't think is designed for that. I took mine apart to lube a sticking fan shaft and the inside looks like a hair dryer. By its design the high heat from the heating elements is going to burn something out in time. I think either my heating elements were shorting or something on the control board was going with mine. The elements wouldn't heat up on the first try when it started going and at the end they'd get hot, shut off and cool way below set temps, turn on, off....
The guts of the iRoast can be replaced but for what a new one costs now...
My replacement roaster is a Hottop.
Oh yeah. One benefit I found from the iRoast is the lowish roasting capacity. With the iRoast2 I could roast 5 SO's separately, pick and choose during the week for drip and blend for espresso. So one bean could be roasted light, another med, another med/dark according to what I found was best for the particular bean. With a larger capacity roaster like the Hottop I can't roast as many SO's separately. I'd never be able to finish them all before they got stale. The Hottop espresso roasts are getting blended green.
Kirk
LMWDP #116