Help me get better roasts with my Quest M3 (with graphs) - Page 4

Discuss roast levels and profiles for espresso, equipment for roasting coffee.
Beanz
Posts: 140
Joined: 12 years ago

#31: Post by Beanz »

amh0001 wrote:
A couple things I notice. If my amps are reading wrong then it does make it hard to compare what im doing to other peoples suggested amps. However, I think what you are saying is I should pay more attention to my MET rather then my amps. Also my plug is deep underneath the counter so its not very practical for me to look under there with a flash light everytime I change amps.

One thing I notice is that everyones graphs seem to take MUCH longer to hit TP and to hit 300 degrees (f). Most of my TPs are around 30 seconds and also my 300 degress are less then 4 mins in. I think this is partially because of my alternate bean probe temp. Also I dont end up seeing my beans go yellow untill 320-330 degrees.
If the plug is under the bench run a short extension / plug board so you can get the display where it is easy to see on the bench. The reason that I am suggesting the Quest community compare Watts is because the meter is small and had to read with any accuracy. It is hard to set repeatedly with any accuracy reading from the meter. In Australia we use 240V, in the US line voltage could vary between 114 and 126V ?? + varying current readings.
Watts means we are all speaking the same language.

I am suggesting that Watts is the best measure of roast power, but you can watch the MET as it allows you to anticipate the bean temperature and correct a stall or unwanted temperature rise before it follows through to BT. MET responds very quickly to changes BT lags behind

The variation from other peoples graphs could be a number of issues. Probe placement, the temperature you load the beans and the charge weight of the beans.
I would move the probe to the standard position rather in than the door, that is my opinion others may disagree. I would increase the weight of your beans to 200g per load, without back tracking I think you mentioned 150g. The lower weight of greens means the roast will move faster for the same roast power

User avatar
NoStream
Posts: 283
Joined: 11 years ago

#32: Post by NoStream »

amh0001 wrote:

Adam sent me two coffees, I believe these two to assess. I figured I'd just post here so there's more feedback and people working with the Quest (especially with BT2 rather than BT1, since BT1 is way more common) can have more reference points. By the way, I haven't looked at these graphs until now - I was assessing blind.

I brewed up both as Perger-style v60-01s, 12:204, 204F, bloom 40s, first pour @40s, second pour @1:15. Both finished at around 2:20 (2:21 and 2:19 for the Colombia and Costa respectively). Both batches' beans broke pretty easily and looked reasonably well-developed internally.

The Colombia TDS'ed at 1.27, for an extraction yield (EY) of 20.1%. Sweetness was well-developed, and the coffee's not baked. I immediately noticed a cigar-distillate flavor - I don't think this is scorching, but rather just a roast that went too dark (for my palate, and I think for Adam's based on his comments). It's a little lemony, and there's a fermenty-berry thing going on (a green coffee issue/bonus, depending on your perspective). I'd probably just try roasting this slightly lighter - back off on heat a bit faster in development, and you'll get rid of the smoky character.

The Costa TDS'ed quite a bit lower at 1.14, for an EY of 18.1% - probably this coffee is a bit underdeveloped in some sense, or at least it's not very soluble. It's also quite sweet, and cleaner than the Colombia - that smoky-cigar-tobacco aroma is present but very minimal. It's a simple cup, but a good one. I think that's just the green coffee, not roasting. This one is slightly the opposite of the above - probably needs to be pushed a little harder than the one above.

It's pretty interesting how little increase in temp BT2 shows in development - it's a really light probe with very little thermal mass. When I've worked with it, I was surprised how BT1 could show a very pretty roast when BT2 - with less smoothing, in some sense, since it's so light, and less momentum - would show a sort-of stall.

Perhaps also try experimenting with fan settings? Though if you've already done the Rao lighter trick, you're probably close enough. That's just another potential source of smokiness.

I actually think these roasts are pretty competent - I've been served worse on many occasions. I'll update this post with further thoughts over the next few days.

User avatar
happycat
Posts: 1464
Joined: 11 years ago

#33: Post by happycat »

amh0001 wrote:WEll,

After about 7 roasts, 3 of them in the trash, I'm getting pretty frustrated. I haven't had a good homeroasted cup in a while either.....

Tried to follow happycats instructions.....tough because of my alt BT probe, If it give it more heat in the middle im getting FC around 6 mins, roast smells smokey.

Tried following Jim S instructions...scorched and crazy graph.

Tried doing some of my own ideas.....meh

I just dont understand what is so different about my quest, and why it is so hard to get a good roast out of it. Hopefully I get this figured out before I throw in the towel.

Thanks everyone for all the help........
Sorry it didnt work for you.

Point of clarification... Is power off between charge and turning point? My power is 10 preheat, off after charge, 10 at turning point, then bleeding off after peak bean temp. That doesn't seem to match your description of "more power" half way through.

I do light roasts so they are never smokey.
LMWDP #603

btreichel
Posts: 141
Joined: 8 years ago

#34: Post by btreichel »

I bet if you were able to get together with a local home roaster things would become clearer.

amh0001 (original poster)
Posts: 168
Joined: 8 years ago

#35: Post by amh0001 (original poster) »

Yes are there any roasters in the North LA area?

But I do have some good news! This morning I had a 4.5 out of 5 cup! Here is what I've figuring out.

MET: Seeing as I have BT2 and I get different readings. I decided to follow MET rather then "8 amps here, 6 amps there". I also realized then when people were suggesting a hot charge IE 400+ BT, I was actually much hotter because my BT2 sits lower in the drum. Focusing on MET helps with all of this.

BEAN QUALITY: Even though a lot of the unwanted flavors I was getting I attribute to the way I was roasting. You cant expect amazing coffee with meh greens.

This morning I had some Ethiopa rated at 92. During cupping it tasted like Brisk lemon Iced Tea. Tasting in pour over, it is chocolaty, sweet, and has lemon tea in the background. I was really happy thinking this cup. Here is the sloppy graph. I think I did use some fan in this roast, and I'm not sure how important that was. I find fan is a good way to move heat around and make your amp changes happen faster. I need to keep experimenting. I roasted 6 coffees in a similar fashion. There was little to no Tobacco flavors present. Some where papery and dull, but I feel thats because I'm still getting control of the process. I am going to keep roasting this way and see what I can find out and report back.



I don't feel as if i'm completely THERE yet, but I feel like i'm getting closer. I really appreciate everyone that continues to read and has offered their wisdom. :D

Bak Ta Lo
Supporter ♡
Posts: 932
Joined: 12 years ago

#36: Post by Bak Ta Lo »

AssafL wrote:Sometimes smoky notes come from burnt skins accumulating under the drum. Perhaps see if it needs cleaning?
+1

After I found a very high wattage vacuum cleaner that I can insert in the small hole in the back of the drum I have had a dramatic decrease in smoke, much cleaner roasts.
LMWDP #371

Bak Ta Lo
Supporter ♡
Posts: 932
Joined: 12 years ago

#37: Post by Bak Ta Lo »

amh0001 wrote:Yes are there any roasters in the North LA area?

But I do have some good news! This morning I had a 4.5 out of 5 cup! Here is what I've figuring out.

MET: Seeing as I have BT2 and I get different readings. I decided to follow MET rather then "8 amps here, 6 amps there". I also realized then when people were suggesting a hot charge IE 400+ BT, I was actually much hotter because my BT2 sits lower in the drum. Focusing on MET helps with all of this.

BEAN QUALITY: Even though a lot of the unwanted flavors I was getting I attribute to the way I was roasting. You cant expect amazing coffee with meh greens.

This morning I had some Ethiopa rated at 92. During cupping it tasted like Brisk lemon Iced Tea. Tasting in pour over, it is chocolaty, sweet, and has lemon tea in the background. I was really happy thinking this cup. Here is the sloppy graph. I think I did use some fan in this roast, and I'm not sure how important that was. I find fan is a good way to move heat around and make your amp changes happen faster. I need to keep experimenting. I roasted 6 coffees in a similar fashion. There was little to no Tobacco flavors present. Some where papery and dull, but I feel thats because I'm still getting control of the process. I am going to keep roasting this way and see what I can find out and report back.

<image>

I don't feel as if i'm completely THERE yet, but I feel like i'm getting closer. I really appreciate everyone that continues to read and has offered their wisdom. :D
Adam,

Great to hear you are getting close to that 5 level roast, and I'm commenting to help bump this thread back up, as I am really enjoying reading along and trying all the great suggestions.

Funny, I have just finished 6 batches of a SM Colombia and used the same hot charge roast you show above in your graph. Very excited to cup it later to see the results, but it is the best declining RoR I have ever had.

Interestingly, I have a print out of notes from Another_Jim's old original comments from how to use the Quest, with settings , times, event points to use as a guide. I had always had trouble hitting those markers. But I noticed my roasts today hitting them one after another, a good sign!

Keep up the posts on your results, I enjoy testing the suggestions along with you.
LMWDP #371

rgrosz
Posts: 331
Joined: 14 years ago

#38: Post by rgrosz »

amh0001 wrote:I don't feel as if i'm completely THERE yet, but I feel like i'm getting closer. I really appreciate everyone that continues to read and has offered their wisdom. :D
I don't know anything about the Quest, but I am baffled by what I see on your graph. I don't think I have ever done a roast with so little change in BT between 1st crack and the end of the roast (yours is only 5F). As a result, the ROR seems way too low - almost zero, then increasing again.

For most of my Hottop roasts, the change in BT between 1st crack and the end of the roast is about 25F. The ROR is usually between 5 and 10 at the end of the roast.
LMWDP #556
Life is too short to drink bad wine - or bad coffee

amh0001 (original poster)
Posts: 168
Joined: 8 years ago

#39: Post by amh0001 (original poster) »

Bak,

Thank you for the kind words. I am very happy to hear you enjoy the thread and are roasting like me! Please do report back with tasting notes and graphs. I am currently roasting some batches, but I am changing my charge size down to 125 grams to see how that will affect the results. I found that a drying phase of 450 was good to not scorch the beans as much, but also was heating a bit too slow hitting 300 around 5-6 mins.

Rgrosz,

I understand why my graphs look different in that aspect. It is because I am using a very thin prob that in through the bolt in the sight glass window. No Stream talks about this in a post above. I was worried about it in the beginning but now I know its because of the probe. I am actually probably going to order the BT1 probe from Eric just to have some reference to other users.

I will post some graphs and updates soon.

amh0001 (original poster)
Posts: 168
Joined: 8 years ago

#40: Post by amh0001 (original poster) »

Just an update of where I'm at.

I have at least stopped most my roasts from having that tobacco flavor. I believe the causes were two major things. Too high of temps. My BT probe is much lower in the drum and I cannot compare that to people with BT1. I try to focus on MET. The other factor is green coffee flavor. I had bought 5 lbs of Guatemala to practice roasting, and I think that on top of getting too hot, I just didnt care for the coffee.

I am after a specific flavor that I got in a green coffee from maui (that 5 of 5 cup). Overall sweetness with a touch of acidity that tightens the tongue just enough to make your mouth water and comeback for another sip. WIthout any bitterness or burnt flavors. Also I have been getting really good coffees from Eithopia (yirgs) that have amazing florals and fruits, however I am not roasting them the best to bring out those flavors correctly.

Most my coffee has been over roasted leading to burnt flavors, and muted flavor notes. For instance here is a La Minita Coasta Rica coffee. I have been trying to focus on getting a nice declining ROR and a nice decline after 1C. I was really happy with the look of this graph! I tried holding my MET at 490, because of how it influences my ROR.



I felt that this graph hit a lot of points that are suggested for a good roast.

1. declining ROR
2. 300 BT around 4 mins
3. Total roast time around 10 minutes
4. a development time around %20

The graph looks pretty nice. The problem is the cup tastes super FLAT (like the MET line). I dont get overly roasted flavors. I dont get baked. I just get muted flavors that leave the cup tasting super flat and boring. Underneath in there I can taste there is greatness in this coffee, it has hints of the sweetness and acidity im looking for. I tried messing with my grind to see if that would make a difference, I got a TDS of 1.4 (using a brix refractometer from my homebrewing days, multiplied by .85). I can tell the coffee is not under or over extracted, just flat boring.

I think this makes sense as there is not really a RAMP in the roast. I'm not too sure how to make this better.

I would think in order to give the coffee a RAMP I could dry around 450 and ramp to 500(MET) to finish out the roast. This is has been my go to method trying to emulate NoStreams graphs. But I find I get sagging in the middle with ROR, and an anemic 1C, with overly roasted flavors. I wish I could just get this Ironed out and get that great cup.

Here has been some of my other roasts.



This is a Ethiopian Yirg, from Sweet Marias. A 92 point coffee. I tried charging at 450 MET and then ramping at around the 3 min mark, then hitting with some FAN while keeping it under 500 MET. backed off the amps during first crack to get a declining ROR during development. I think once again its a nice looking graph.

Tastes in the cup, SO flavors are muted and flat, overly roasted with some burnt roasty flavors. hints of florals and fruits in the back, but not sweet or clear.

Im really interested to see what peoples thoughts are.

Cheers
Adam