Sherman wrote: opposing positions with regard to roasting with a HG/BM and decking it out with probes, triacs and such. I don't know that we're so far apart.
maybe opposite sides of a very small pond
I realized that I'm leveraging the thermometry equipment in conjunction with my senses to gain consistency;
Somewhere along the way I reported on possibly 20-30 HG/DB roasts I did with fairly reliable temp measurement. Attach various sorts of sensors about 3/8" from bottom of stirring stick, used slightly smaller bowls for deeper bean bed and established reliable results and control. Surprisingly brief learning curve--just a matter of getting the dexterity down. It
was informative. However, I realized that after a short period of feedback learning, I was validating temps and heat profiles with my "reading" of the roast, rather than having the temp data guide the roast. This seemed very backwards. Played some games: watch the roast, try to guess the temp, then check it. Soon, if there was a small conflict (profile I had in mind along with readout say to go a few degrees higher; But I say, seems time to ease up into exotherm-ville I nearly always went with my own judgment and at least lots of times I was correct.
I utilize this assistive technology where I see it to add value and benefit. I rely on both the readouts and my senses to tell me when I've hit my target.
I've no problem with added value, but seems that there are often added and unintended costs (i.e., effort) that go along with the value. These are worth examining.
All that said, I've just begun roasting consistently again after an 18 month gap in semi-temp housing. Have a grand apartment with small terrace looking east to the river and north up Park Ave to Grand Central. 26th floor. Morning sun/glare makes roasting difficult and afternoon gets a little windy. Some great problems to solve.