Bkeef wrote: ((1))For me roasting is not really therapeutic it's a means to an end. I don't mind sitting through a roast but I dont really want to sit through 3 roasts. . . . .
((2))Guess the bread machine/ air gun deal might be worth trying
#1. Somehow HG/Dogbowl roasting has gotten tagged with "artisanal," "zen," and has morphed into therapy. I find it satisfying, but I can't say that it does more for my soul or psyche than would using a plug-and-play roaster. There's no magic involved that lets one get by with more or less knowledge and inspiration than any other form of roasting. Now let's add a big
IMO because I haven't tried most other forms. But let me ask (Bkeef) how long are you willing to "sit through" a roast?
In my experience, starting at roughly 8 ounces, increasing the batch size of HG roasts adds about a minute per ounce per roast. 10 oz is my sweet point for 9 to 11-minute roasts, generally targeted to start of but not into 2nd c. and following color and smoke cues. I can focus, think about stuff, for that amount of time. A 16 oz roast takes about 16+ minutes. That gets too tedious. Also, I have slightly
less control at the larger sizes, and I've never been able say that my roasts benefited with the extra time. In sum, 20 oz in 2 roasts or 16 oz in one roast.
My routine is to do 3 or 4 10oz roasts every 2-3 weeks +/-. I vac seal and freeze. Elapsed time for the whole process netting 2 lbs is about 1hr 15 minutes including set up, weighing, freezing, etc. I haven't seen comparable start-finish times posted for many other methods, but this seems to be in the ballpark. Also, most people agree that they give their roast their full attention, so "hands free" doesn't mean you can go read a magazine.
#2 I'd suggest you start with a Heatgun. The Porter Cable that I tried puts out the highest and loudest air volume available and having tried it I'd recommend the hotter and more controllable Makita 1100. I've only given the Bread Machine a few tries but it seems that it adds layers of complexity with no discernible added value.-- unless, of course, you are committed to a permanent set-up and aspire to thermometric roasting and logging. But that doesn't seem consistent with "means to an end." Also, I really question whether the mass of the BM body adds a worthwhile thermal mass for temp stability beyond a double-walled bowl. I wouldn't trade off the mass for the completely visible view of the beans. If you are confident about the returns obtainable from a higher-tech and more passive set-up, you can add the BM.