another_jim wrote:This may be true of drums, but not of convection roasters, where the profile is size independent. The larger drums do retard heat transfer.
Ken Fox wrote:What's the proof that large commercial drum roasters have a better roast product than smaller commercial drums? What is the dividing line between these larger and smaller commercial drum roasters? This quotation makes no sense to me and appears to lack any basis in fact.
My own overall limited observations are consistent with the concept of the effect of convection becoming more prominent as the ratio of the volumetric bean mass to conductive surface increases. Namely, the roast changes in a characteristic way as the bean mass increases. Thus, one way of controlling this in a small home roaster like the Behmor is to restrict the amount roasted per batch. This is one method I employ to good effect.
However, it runs counter to my presumption that a commercial drum unit would produce a better roast by virtue of its physical construction. If it is true that the larger drum roasters will function more by convection, air flow might become increasingly important as a means of regulating bean temperature. Now, I do this now by simply opening the door to my Behmor during the roast to vent the hot air, albeit being limited by the fact that this almost certainly alters the relationship between the ambient air temperature(which I measure) to the bean roast temperature.
The title of this thread was made tongue-in-cheek, and I came in with the presumption that commercial roasters are inherently superior machines, but having heard from those with more experience than I, it seems perhaps that one should not jump to this conclusion so fast, neither lusting for bigger, fancier roasters, nor scorning the humble home roaster. Perhaps the home roaster has the capacity to actually produce a roast equal to that of a commercial unit, and it is the lack of experience and skill on the part of the enthusiast upon which the onus of producing a good roast lies?







