Alchemist wrote:You hit the same wall I have in regards to beans. The permutations are so large, that in practicality there is no good way for one person to test the Behmor.
Sure there is. Just have a few
hundred pounds of greens
and multiple Behmor's
and and unlimited time.

Wait, you did say
in practicality
Alchemist wrote:It is really going to take it making it to market and having people post and pool data and experiences.
Absolutely agree. Same as it's been for all other home roasting appliances/methods. (Professionals and commercial roasters too for that matter.)
Alchemist wrote:I too have found that 1 lb is possible, but IMO it is better suited for 8-12 oz roasts, at least on the later profiles.
Basically agree and realize we view this differently. Just not an issue to me that a 1# max batch size rated roaster
may not perform at it's optimal level at it's max batch size. Right or wrong I keep thinking analogous to a $9000 7# max batch size roaster performing best with 4 to 5# batches while at 7# max batch little profile control and longer roast times. (Like a Diedrich IR3.)
Alchemist wrote:One thing you may not have noticed about the design (that you data does show).
When the afteburner kicks in, there is an ambient temperature drop -- just like you would want in a drum roast, just not "programmed". So even P1 that is 100% is not 100% if you catch my drift. It is 100%, then some lesser amount at about 40% of the roast time in as the afterburner (and draw fan) kick in. Another item I noticed was that the after burner does contribute to the roast profile, both as above in dropping the temperature, and again a little later from radiative heat.
Yes I'd noticed that but failed to directly address it. When the afterburner and draw fan kick in initially there's a drop in temp while the afterburner heats up to temp and the draw fan is cycling air out. Later during a 100% run the maximum measured environmental temp appears to be greater than prior to afterburner/draw fan. Here's a 12 minute no bean run. I did not pre-heat, but rather pre-warmed simulating back to back batches. (Heated a couple minutes then fully cooled before next "batch run".)
12 minute 100% P1 no bean temps:
12 90f (start of roast environment before run following pre-warm)
11:30 103
11 163
10:30 241
10 306
9:30 352
9 389
8:30 417
8 441
7:30 462
7 481 (afterburner/draw fan just kicking in, coincidentally heater turned off virtually simultaneously)
6:30 472 (heater kicks back on shortly after)
6 457
5:30 479
5 498 (heater kicked off right at 498, hit high of 502)
4:30 488 (heater back on a bit later)
4 465
3:30 485 (heater off 3:15)
3 487 (heat on 2:42)
2:30 457
2 492 (heat off 1:42)
1:30 490
1 460 (heat on right at 1:00)
0:30 455
0 482 (kick to cooling, did not record further temps.)
Alchemist wrote:I inadvertantly tested this once by having the afterburner unplugged during a p1 roast. It didn't hit 1st until 21 minutes.
A different effect and benefit of having the afterburner manually controlled would be turning it off at the start of cooling cycle during in roaster cooling for a bit faster cooling. This of course would defeat the "smoke-less" feature and hence is not part of the stock design for in the house usage. Ideally the afterburner would be external to the roast chamber so it didn't add heat to the roast environment during cooling. This would also mean different overall design spec's including heater/draw fan relationship since afterburner wouldn't be compensating for draw fan during roasting.
Alchemist wrote:The p2 profile adjustment I like best so far is to set it to maximum time (when doing a pound) so the first stage is maximized for heat soak. I then pull the end time immediately back to 20 minutes for timekeeping purposes since an adjustment after the roast starts simply takes time off the final stage.
That (or similar) would likely work well targeting anything from Cinnamon to FC rather than the Light Vienna I achieved P2 yesterday!
Alchemist wrote:I have also found TC placement to be REALLY tricky and that is going to be the crux for comparing data.
Always is any two roasters!
Alchemist wrote:Even though this is not where I have been placing mine, I might suggest placing it where the roaster's TC is located. If you have not found it, it is in the back right, in front of the heaters. It is actually mounted on the other side of the wall, inside the control and wiring space on the right. With it's placement, I have noticed there is a lag time because it is not directly reading the roasting environment, but the wall temperature through the wall. Note, that is how the profiles are based, so I don't see a major issue with that.
TC placement wise simply fished over the top and looped back into the chaff collector seems to work fairly well as "temporary" location. I believe (but haven't confirmed) no bean temps read higher than with batch since the beans block the direct radiant heat path between the TC and the heaters.
Alchemist wrote:This also means that wall needs to remain clean or roast profiles may start to drift (remember that in the alpen roast?).
Yes, that's one of the purposes of the suggested no bean burn every 5 batches. Another is to burn off any oils that may accumulate in the exhaust path.
Alchemist wrote:I have started one item that I like. If you start the roaster empty (doesn't matter what profile) for 1.25 minutes, you can have a consistent preheat. Not as good as a hot preheat, but something. That time gets the interior to about 200 F which is below the safety set that is programmed in (you can't start the roaster over 130 C). Basically start a roast, count 1.25 minutes, cool/off, load and start. It helps with giving a slightly more robust 1st as opposed to the "sneaker" 1st you (and I) have experienced.
Though you mentioned it via email (yesterday?) haven't implemented it yet. Makes sense especially for 1# batches. FWIW just tested pre-heat 1:30, works too. From idle. Then tested 1:30 simulating back to back batches and it was too hot so wouldn't start until cooling further. (Had drum out chaff collector in for pre-heat test portion so could simulate having drum loaded and ready.) Suspected and confirmed really need to go by pre-heat temp not fixed pre-heat time for repeatability. (duh)
Alchemist wrote:I have yet to play with 1/4 lb at all? I wonder if anyone will?
If this was a
formal official review probably should. Though no I haven't and it's not high on my test priorities.
(So much for not posting for a spell, or it was just a very weak spell.

)