by scrutinizer on Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:34 pm
While it has been discussed more extensively by others before, the mere act of removing and installing the same burrs in a different position on the carrier can show improvements if the parts (burr, carrier) were not machined precisely. From my experience the burrs are not of particularly uniform thickness (measured w/ caliper w/ some difficulty, varies from set to set) and the carrier could also be non-uniform. Therefore, with 3 screws for each burr you have 6 possible attachment points that could be tested (although I found I could not remove the lower burr w/o possibly damaging it so its easier to do this with the upper only).
On my Rocky, I tried this a few times w/ different burr sets and if I rotated the upper burr attachment to carrier, of the 3 possible options, there was usually one where the "zero" point of burr touch (once assembled) was the lowest and that was the one that I would use. Going from memory, I think the variability for different burr/carrier attachment configurations was at least a few clicks on the adjuster if not more (approx 2--4 clicks). Having a high point on the carrier mated with a high point on the burr could certainly explain why near "zero" grind would not be as fine as expected in some cases.
Overall, I could get good shots from the Rocky but consistency varied a bit (not so bad to be a deal breaker for me and I used for 9 yrs). I recently upgraded to B. Vario and the difference was discernible and worth the cost to me...mostly improved ease of use, consistency, and a notable but modest step up in flavor (more subtle nuances tasted). Overall, the Rocky must have produced more fines because if I broke apart dry pucks they would produce a fine suspension of dust (that I don't see with similarly disturbed dried vario pucks).
Pat