Clive·Coffee: Great coffee at home

Origin and Purpose of Doser - Page 3

Postby Bluecold on Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:05 pm

CafSuperCharged wrote:But, Greg (nitpick) and Jim, once upon a time when the stupid Italian engineers who could not know nothing of quality coffee decided they would throw a doser into the barista process they did not have to think about its volume, coffee maturing vs. going stale, and other things but just wild-ass guessed a volume.

Well, the Mazzer Kony has the same size hopper as the Super Jolly. Since the Kony is slower, it is suited to less volume, which means grounds sit longer in the Kony doser than in the SJ doser.
LMWDP #232
"Though I Fly Through the Valley of Death I Shall Fear No Evil For I am at 80,000 Feet and Climbing."
User avatar
Bluecold
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Jul 10, 2008
Location: The Netherlands

Postby CafSuperCharged on Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:27 pm

Bluecold wrote:Well, the Mazzer Kony has the same size hopper as the Super Jolly. Since the Kony is slower, it is suited to less volume, which means grounds sit longer in the Kony doser than in the SJ doser.

I think your reasoning is flawed.
The grinder speed is not the limiting factor in the throughput as long as the doser is large enough to cache grind speed.

Regards
Peter
CafSuperCharged
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Dec 22, 2007
Location: Netherlands, Europe

Postby Worldman on Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:53 pm

Hmmm...is it possible that uber-fresh beans, i.e. 1 hour post roast, can be consumed sooner if ground and allowed to sit for some hours? Will the de-gas process be quickened enough to allow consumption of a good tasting espresso, i.e. one that is not harsh or gassy?

Len <---- can't wait to get my just roasted espresso beans for the week and try it out
Len's Espresso Blend
www.lensespressoblends.com
User avatar
Worldman
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh

Postby RapidCoffee on Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:00 pm

Jim suggests exactly this on p.1 of this thread:
another_jim wrote:If they [roasters] recommend to rest a coffee post roast for several days, grinding it and letting it sit for several hours does the same thing.
John
User avatar
RapidCoffee
Team HB
 
Posts: 2822
Joined: Dec 11, 2005
Location: Rapid City, SD

Postby cannonfodder on Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:28 pm

Yup, been doing that for a while now. While grinding and letting it sit to degas will eliminate some of the excess gas in the coffee, it still does not mature the blend. Like picking a ripe red tomato verses one picked green then gassed red. You cut down on the excessive crema production but the overall taste is still a bit young. If I am out of beans and all I have is a day or two post roast, I will do this as a cheat or brew regular coffee which is more tolerant of fresh from the roaster coffee.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
Team HB
 
Posts: 6812
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Downingtown PA

Postby Psyd on Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:06 pm

cannonfodder wrote:I will do this as a cheat


I agree with Dave. It isn't a solution for bad planning really, just the best available solution when you've run yourself out of beans and your roaster only has what he's roasted today, and last night. It'll work OK, but it's not optimal.
Espresso Sniper
One Shot, One Kill

LMWDP #175
User avatar
Psyd
 
Posts: 2077
Joined: Feb 21, 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Postby GC7 on Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:52 am

another_jim wrote:Staleness is an equilibrium state in which all coffees are equally mediocre, no matter how good or bad they were to start out. If you are selling generic coffee, making it completely stale is a great way to ensure consistency and to cut raw material costs. Since most Italian espresso is generic, they stale it as a matter of course.

It takes about a week for ground coffee to stale completely; although since it's an exponential process, a day post grind (espresso fineness) will take care of a lot of the funk (or good aromas, if they are there). The problems is that the coffee sits in the doser far less long.


Just a point for the sake of accuracy. Equilibrium implies a TWO WAY status. Stale coffee is NOT in a state of equilibium as it will never go back towards a fresh state. Stale coffee is an END POINT.

I also can't see where the chemical processes of becoming stale are exponential reactions. That might imply some catalysis which is not the case. If one day will take care of a lot of the funk that only means that those reactions occur faster and a second, third and beyond that set of reactions occurring as coffee ages take place at slower rates.

Back to dosers.
User avatar
GC7
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Sep 01, 2008
Location: New York

Postby another_jim on Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:45 pm

You need to update your avatar or read up past the 18th century. All equilibrium states where entropy is in play are at either the local or global maximum entropy point and irreversible without outside inputs. Second, all isolated chemical reactions are exponential (i.e half-life style decay), since a fixed percentage of the remaining reactants get used up in each time period.
User avatar
another_jim
Team HB
 
Posts: 7489
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Chicago

Postby GC7 on Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:34 pm

Jim - after that answer you need to stick with your day job! You sound like Professor Irwin Corey.
User avatar
GC7
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Sep 01, 2008
Location: New York

Postby CafSuperCharged on Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:38 am

another_jim wrote:You [GC7] need to update your avatar or read up past the 18th century.

Yes, it is rather assuming to take that one.

another_jim wrote:All equilibrium states where entropy is in play ...

So you are not referring to the maturing/staling of coffee beans through the loss of volatile/gaseous substances any more? (btw, I agree that you can get at an equilibrium that is irreversible.)

another_jim wrote:Second, all isolated chemical reactions are exponential (i.e half-life style decay), since a fixed percentage of the remaining reactants get used up in each time period.

I first read "fixed ... per time" (linear?) but the catch is "fixed percentage ... per time" which would be exponential indeed, implying there would be an asymptote? Seems logical, btw, when concentrations become less all the time.

Enthalpy is no longer what it used to be.

Regards
Peter
CafSuperCharged
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Dec 22, 2007
Location: Netherlands, Europe
www.greatinfusions.com: espresso cups and barista gear, showroom in Santa Cruz
www.greatinfusions.com: espresso cups and barista gear, showroom in Santa Cruz

PreviousNext

Return to Grinders