Monolith Conical retention - Page 3

Grinders are one of the keys to exceptional espresso. Discuss them here.
Rush
Posts: 90
Joined: 9 years ago

#21: Post by Rush »

Coachiain wrote:I have always used a Rocket for my other grinders.
Here is my newly enlisted retention buster, aka silicone cup.

It's not the Monolith but my OCD. 8)
That is a great idea! This is exactly why I visit these forums. Very inexpensive way to achieve zero retention!

mike guy
Posts: 248
Joined: 8 years ago

#22: Post by mike guy »

I just tap the top with my palm to form a seal.

Advertisement
YseanY
Posts: 174
Joined: 10 years ago

#23: Post by YseanY »

Coachiain wrote:I have always used a Rocket for my other grinders.
Here is my newly enlisted retention buster, aka silicone cup.
<image>

It's not the Monolith but my OCD. 8)
Where did you find this?

Coachiain
Posts: 55
Joined: 7 years ago

#24: Post by Coachiain replying to YseanY »

I found mine at a local dollar store when I was trying to find something that would allow me to remove my spent coffee from filter basket without the need of knocking/damaging the puck.


Try here:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/s/ref=is_s ... licone+cup

Not athetically pleasing but a handy place to put it when not in use



mgwolf
Supporter ♡
Posts: 828
Joined: 18 years ago

#25: Post by mgwolf »

If there are a few grams stuck around the base of the burrs that do not get displaced, once that is filled, you will have zero retention every grind. (Without blowing grinds out from the corners after every grind).

To put it another way:
If the Monolith was in the middle of the forest, ground some coffee, and no one opened it up to look, would there be any retention? I think not.

User avatar
aecletec
Posts: 1997
Joined: 13 years ago

#26: Post by aecletec »

mgwolf wrote:once that is filled, you will have zero retention every grind.
This assumes that the forces which put the grounds there in the first place don't dislodge them?
It seems to be contradicted by my and other's experience with other grinders when sometimes we get more out than put in.

Bob_M
Posts: 578
Joined: 16 years ago

#27: Post by Bob_M replying to aecletec »

same here. Thats why daily I place the nozel of a shop minivac directly against the opening of the magnetic funnel, wrap my fingers around it to make a good seal, then turn grinder motor on and pulse suction thru by placing my other hand on top of the coffee bean entry funnel then off. With this technique I add 18.7 grams to get 18.0 grams out.

Advertisement
YseanY
Posts: 174
Joined: 10 years ago

#28: Post by YseanY »

Has anyone here experienced unstable results in terms of retention? I've noticed from time to time, I would get a few grinds that would result in ~0.5 grams retention while other times I would get less than 0.1 grams. While I understand RDT is suggested for the least amount of retention, I haven't been using any RDT or cupping the funnel because while looking at Denis' "tutorial" video, he does not do any of this (and I'm hoping to lessen the steps). Also, in his grinder test report, it indicates that he does not use RDT.

FYI, the grinder probably has just shy of 10lbs put through (so probably not fully broken in) and I haven't removed the chamber to clean since after the first week of receiving the grinder (after grinding ~0.5lbs of beans). Beans are generally not oily and either light or medium roasts. The burrs are the upgraded DLC and since receiving the grinder, I'm about 2 to 2.5 numbers finer in my grind adjustment.

mathof
Posts: 1486
Joined: 13 years ago

#29: Post by mathof replying to YseanY »

Variations in humidity would affect the amount of static electricity generated by the grinding.

Matt

ds
Posts: 669
Joined: 11 years ago

#30: Post by ds »

mathof wrote:Variations in humidity would affect the amount of static electricity generated by the grinding.
Matt
And also different beans and even same beans with different roast.