Chris, I cannot speak for Jim -- nor would I ever attempt to! He has far more experience, and with a wider array of equipment, than I do, as well as being a much better cupper/taster . . . so let me pretend you asked me that question, if you don't mind, though I certainly hope Jim will soon answer for himself . . .
So I was quite content with my Mazzer Mini until I started reading the
Titan Grinder Project (TGP), its various off-shoots, and, specifically, the
TGP: Can It Beat the Robur? thread. As a result of that, I was seriously tempted by, and thinking about purchasing, the Compak K10. I couldn't justify the price, and the early experience/damage in shipment made me nervous. (This, of course, has been rectified.) But what I
did end up buying was a Cimbali Max Hybrid, and I loved it . . .
Then, apparently being unsatisfied (though I didn't realize it at the time), and after reading lots of discussion on it, I moved on to the Mahlkönig K30 Vario, and "banished" the CMH to my office, where it still gets used 5 days a week.
Not being completely happy with my secondary grinders, either at home or the office, I bought the Baratza Vario (
aka Mahlkönig Vario HOME) for the house. (The secondary grinder is less important in the office.)
OK, there comes a point of diminishing returns. That point varies with everyone, with their individual tastes, experiences, expectations, and so on. A professional in the coffee trade (think Jim Schulman or Chris Tacy, to name but two) will have a different "point" than I -- an "experienced newbie" -- will have, let alone someone who is just starting out and quite content with their daily venti lattè from you-know-who . . .
So my two home grinders are the "Varios." There is, in terms of what I paid for them, an approximate $1,000 difference in price. (Saying that out loud sounds really stupid to me -- there's a voice inside my head saying,
You spent HOW much on WHAT?!?!?! Oysh!)
Question No. 1: Is the Mahlkönig K30 Vario a better grinder than the Baratza Vario (
aka Mahlkönig Vario HOME)?
Absolutely!Question No. 2: Is it
one thousand dollars better??? Uh . . . that's a much more difficult question to answer.
The Baratza Vario was not available when I bought the K30 Vario, so obviously it came first. But I may
not have ever purchased the K30 if I had purchased these grinders in the opposite order. As I said above, the things that bother me about the Baratza are silly things (12+ seconds to grind a double, vs. 3+ seconds for the K30). If I had the Baratza first, I would never have become used to the speed of the K30, and 12 seconds would seem really quick to me! The new sleep/memory function soon to be available will resolve my other "silly" concern.
Face it: we passionate hobbyists/aficionados/enthusiasts
do like our fancy toys, be it a hot espresso machine, the latest grinder,
whatever. But like I said above,
zin1953 wrote:how many of us truly need a grinder capable of producing between 120-720 doubles per hour (in our homes)?
There IS a strong undercurrent of "over-kill" among passionate "geeks" of all sorts, whether it's coffee, wine, cars, stereo equipment,
whatever, and that will never go away. But the Baratza Vario can potentially keep a lot more money in people's wallets than any other grinder I can think of!
Cheers,
Jason