www.chriscoffee.com: quality & service, second to none

Compak K10 Fresh - Page 5

Postby Bob_McBob on Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:59 pm

I hate when people start throwing around "retention" numbers with no explanation of how they were calculated. Is that the amount of coffee left inside if you sweep everything out of the grind chamber and chute, then grind through a single dose with no further sweeping? Or is is the amount you get out if you remove everything above the burrs down to the little broken bits of beans, grind everything through, and sweep it all out? Only the latter is a useful figure when determining how much you have waste at the beginning of a session to get to the fresh, unground beans when using a hopper.
Chris
LMWDP #295
User avatar
Bob_McBob
 
Posts: 926
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada

Postby shadowfax on Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:10 pm

In the case of doserless grinders, it's the amount of ground coffee between the burrs and the exit chute. There is very, very extensive discussion of how best to gauge this in this thread. A pretty good estimate on a doserless grinder would be to clean it out relatively well and then load up 75 grams of coffee and grind through it and see how much you get back. This will probably underestimate retention a little.
Nicholas Lundgaard
User avatar
shadowfax
Team HB
 
Posts: 3080
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Postby Bob_McBob on Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:22 pm

I realize there has been a fair bit of discussion on this subject in the past. My concern is more for when when people start throwing around numbers in threads like this, e.g. "4 grams" for the K10 Fresh. It's not useful information without further qualification.

I think if you are using a grinder with a hopper, the only useful "retention" figure is what I described in my second example, taking into account the heavily broken beans stuck in the burrs, the coffee in the grind chamber, and what is trapped in the chute. This is how you arrive at the traditional 10 gram figure for grinders like the K10 WBC/Pro Barista. Brushing out the chute can cut it down by a few grams, but this is usually less practical with a doserless grinder.

I would like to know how the 4 gram figure I keep seeing for the K10 Fresh was ascertained. With my K10 WBC, single dosing with a completely clean chamber, I lose about 6.5 grams. A quick brush of the easily accessible chute gets another 3-3.5 grams out, leaving 3 grams inside that can be completely removed with further bumping and brushing. I find it hard to believe that the sum total of everything the K10 Fresh holds in its burrs, grinding chamber, and inaccessible areas of the chute when using a hopper is only 4 grams. I also don't think most users are going to be sticking a brush up the chute all the time.
Chris
LMWDP #295
User avatar
Bob_McBob
 
Posts: 926
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada

Postby shadowfax on Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:43 pm

You're right, I'm pretty suspicious the Fresh has 4g retention. I'd really have to see the grind path exposed to believe that.
Nicholas Lundgaard
User avatar
shadowfax
Team HB
 
Posts: 3080
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Postby dogjamboree on Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:35 am

Hi,

A post I wrote was quoted a bit earlier. I came up with a 4g retention figure by running the grinder until coffee stopped coming out. Then I brushed out the chute, and vacuumed with my powerful little Dyson.

Next I weighed out 20 grams of beans, ran them through the grinder, and weighed the results. If I remember correctly, I tried a couple different times with different bean masses, and always came out around 4g stuck in the chute.

I didn't read the post that was referred to in this thread regarding the recommended methodology, but this seemed like a common-sense approach to me -- correct me if I'm wrong.

Frank
dogjamboree
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Oct 12, 2011
Location: Portland, OR

Postby shadowfax on Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:43 am

Impressive. I don't know if that's acceptable or not. If there's a flap in the system for static reduction, this would have defeated your vacuum. If not, then it's still likely an underestimate, because a free-spinning, unloaded burr will clear the chamber in a way that doesn't happen when you're using it with a full hopper and using its timer control.

I think the real crux is the anti-static flap. We need a documented disassembly or blown up parts diagram, I think, to really know.
Nicholas Lundgaard
User avatar
shadowfax
Team HB
 
Posts: 3080
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Postby Nik on Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:11 am

I have a portable dyson and it was never capable of clearing the coffee retention from my Macap M7D. However a small soft Le Creuset silicone (kitchen stores/Surlatable) measuring cup did. By turning it upside down over the grind chamber and pumping it the grinds would literally fly out the shoot. Pump, turn on the grinder and do this routine and it removes the grinds locked inside very efficiently.

Not very elegant but effective. Might be a hassle if the hopper has to be removed. I never used the hopper.
Nik
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC

Postby JohnB. on Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:56 am

dogjamboree wrote:A post I wrote was quoted a bit earlier. I came up with a 4g retention figure by running the grinder until coffee stopped coming out. Then I brushed out the chute, and vacuumed with my powerful little Dyson.


Was the grinder running while you vacuumed the chute? If not the sweeper segments could easily hold back 2/3 of the grounds in the burr chamber.
LMWDP 267
User avatar
JohnB.
 
Posts: 1460
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Location: northeastern Ct.

Postby Viernes on Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 pm

Bob_McBob wrote:I hate when people start throwing around "retention" numbers with no explanation of how they were calculated. Is that the amount of coffee left inside if you sweep everything out of the grind chamber and chute, then grind through a single dose with no further sweeping? Or is is the amount you get out if you remove everything above the burrs down to the little broken bits of beans, grind everything through, and sweep it all out? Only the latter is a useful figure when determining how much you have waste at the beginning of a session to get to the fresh, unground beans when using a hopper.


Sorry for disturb you, I just tried to help.

Not exact numbers on my last post though; I took the measurements some time ago. Let me post some numbers that I had noted in a notebook.

Chute retention: 1.73g
Burr Chamber: 5.70g

This is the amount of coffee retained after grind all the coffee remained in the hopper. To measure, I opened the grinder and I took all coffee from the burr chamber and the chute. Be aware that I usually remove with a large spoon some coffee retained in the flap. The "chute retention" refers to the amount of coffee that I can't remove from the outside with the spoon.

Image

shadowfax wrote:A pretty good estimate on a doserless grinder would be to clean it out relatively well and then load up 75 grams of coffee and grind through it and see how much you get back. This will probably underestimate retention a little.


Load 75g of coffee with a completely clean burr chamber & chute gives 70.7g out.
A second load of 75g gives 72.4g
A third load gives 72.0g

shadowfax wrote:I think the real crux is the anti-static flap. We need a documented disassembly or blown up parts diagram, I think, to really know.


Yes. As I said there is a flap, which of course can be removed as is attached with 1 screw. This should minimize the retention a little. Sorry, I have no measurements of this.
Viernes
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain

Postby A312 on Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:32 pm

Has anyone else purchased the K8 or K10 Fresh? I was wondering how others were attempting to fit it on top of their counters and under the cabinets, utilizing the short hopper? 20" high is a tight fit under most cabinets. Has anyone tried modifying the height (removing feet if it has any, etc.) to squeeze it under the cabinet? By looking at the pictures of it, I'm not sure if anything can be done to shave some height off of it, other than trimming the hopper. Any comments appreciated.

Thanks
A312
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: North East

PreviousNext

Return to Grinders