+1 on what Jon wrote
My 2nd Nino arrived yesterday, so I may be in a position to help create some harmony and consensus over this soon.
I'll need other testers for this and a protocol that as many people here on HB as possible agree as solid.
Again the idea is not to convince anyone else but to be able to share something from this that is more than anecdotal evidence and give the community here a more objective basis to discuss the pros and cons of single-shot dosing. And of course I may give everyone the entertainment value of having to eat my own words.
I won't run the test immediately because I think I need a few weeks to season/run in the new grinder until it's performing consistently and as close to the first one I bought as possible.
I'd like to involve a few more people too, and for two reasons: easier to test blind, more input and observations.
So anyone interested who lives in or is going to be in the UK who wants to participate please contact me. If one of these people has a Super Jolly with around 1 year's domestic use under its belt we could perhaps play with those too, depending on the time and stamina of all involved.
I think it may be essential to use a machine that manages its own heat stability in a way everyone finds acceptably consistent. I use lever machines. My 2009 Cremina is a great machine and I can manage the temperature profile to my own satisfaction for quite a number of shots, but it's no GS3. Another alternative for temperature profile is for me to PID one of my Caravels. But then, the repeatability of pressure profile could be an issue with either of these machines. The Elektra gives a constant pressure profile, but is less stable on the temperature front and also gives less shots before a refill is required.
So maybe we need another machine... I would be happy to drag my grinders to the house of someone with a machine that is recognised as offering repeatable pressure and temperature profiles. Alternatively I may try and arrange something in a coffee showroom. I'll also try and involve a roaster.
Which would people find most valid/valuable?
Overall I am suggesting:
1) Same grinders with "seasoned" burrs in both
2) Temperature stable machine with repeatable pressure profile of agreed validity
3) Blind test involving maybe 2 to 4 people. Everyone can be anonymous in the test result, but I will certainly reveal if I make a fool of myself and do not come to the same conclusions this time round
4) Test at 3 doses adapted to suit bean: classic Italian single, then double and then high-dosed New World double, maybe even a double ristretto
5) SO bean of some complexity also suitable for range in (4). I suggest it will be valuable to send 250g of this out to all testers a week before the test so we can become familiar with the nuances of the bean on their own gear. I
do think there is some validity in the observations that come out of the audio industry. Maybe two SO beans to get the range in (4) (max 2 beans, I'd say and that's probably one too many)
6) Spittoon to avoid caffeination clouding judgment
7) ?
Seven is a question because I'd like to hear how people feel about this: would it be best to use exactly the same doses as a compromise for both grinders, or should we use the doses that give the best possible results for each individual grinder used in its different mode - assuming these turn out to be different?
People might also want to comment on whether to extract to blonding (noting each shot volume) or for constant volume.
Can anyone find any holes here or anything they would like to see improved?
I'd very much appreciate your input Jon and Nicholas since I think it might make things even more interesting if we adopt the same protocols.
Cheers
Mike
LMWDP No. 237