jon wrote:What's wrong with Robusta? ... Any ideas?
another_jim wrote:Robusta comes in nearly as many grades as Arabica, going all the way from $0.33 per pound Vietnamese naturals, which taste like spam mixed with rubber cement to lovingly sorted Indian ones that can go for as much as $5 per pouind.
Good robustas are very heavy bodied, taste sweet and sometimes vaguely chocolatey, and have mild aromas of fresh tar and tobacco. In espresso blends, they also stabilize the crema [...] Poor Arabicas and poor Robustas become more similar in taste the more the quality goes down. This is nothing unusual, a poor apple and a poor pear also begin to taste the same; distinctions tend to vanish as quality declines. The same applies when both become stale.
(cont'd)
jon wrote:What's wrong with Robusta?
I've recently bought a La Pavoni lever machine. Beans containing robusta enable a fantastic crema - the coffees quite good too!
Looking at posts on the forum there seems to be a general dislike / disdain for coffee with a high robusta content.
Any ideas? Jon
Marshall wrote:There is nothing wrong with it in small doses in an espresso blend. Some of the best American blends (I'm thinking Victrola's Streamline and most (all?) of Vivace's blends) and most Italian blends include it for crema and a "bite." But, a little goes a long way.
jon wrote:What's wrong with Robusta?
I've recently bought a La Pavoni lever machine. Beans containing robusta enable a fantastic crema - the coffees quite good too!
Looking at posts on the forum there seems to be a general dislike / disdain for coffee with a high robusta content.
Any ideas? Jon
timo888 wrote:There are always exceptions. Paradise Roasters has an excellent 100% S.O. robusta from India.
Regards
Timo