www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you

Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time

Beginner or pro barista, all are invited to share.

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by AndyS on Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:32 pm

I've been very interested in the Clover coffee machine ever since I saw one demonstrated at Gimme Coffee in Ithaca. Shortly thereafter I posted an explanation of the machine on portafilter.net.

When I posted a link to this explanation on alt.coffee, several group members were extremely skeptical that coffee could be properly brewed in the Clover's abbreviated time cycle. Specifically, could one extract a good-tasting, SCAA-recommended 18-22% of the coffee solids when limited to a 30-45 sec dwell time? Some folks speculated that Clover coffee would taste weak and insipid. The only possible explanation we could come up with was that the Clover's filtration system (4.875" dia filter, 70 micron screen, ~0.4 bar vacuum) might support a much finer grind than drip, press or vac pot, and this might facilitate a quick extraction.

As a matter of fact, I've always wondered about this point. And when I heard that many Clover baristas were updosing the dry coffee (using a brew ratio of 8-12% instead of the recommended 5.5-6.5%), I assumed they were compensating for underextraction by overdosing.

Well, that was over two years ago, and Clovers are still so rare and so expensive that I don't have one on my kitchen counter to experiment with <insert sobbing sounds here>. But I finally decided to get off my ass (slightly) and run an extraction experiment with the "Poor Man's Clover," an Aerobee Aeropress. Using the inverted technique that I first learned from Scott Marquardt on Coffeegeek.com, the Aeropress does a very good job imitating a Clover brew.

Sometimes the hardest step in doing an experiment is deciding WHAT IT IS that you're going to test. I often get stuck at this point. There are usually dozens of combinations of parameters, but one never has time to do them all. The teeny weeny graph below is the result of today's experiment. Between running the dinky experiment and writing it up, this is almost 6 hours of work!

Image

I left the data in, but the graphical part is the important thing. It shows a series of Aeropress extractions using two different grind settings on my Versalab M3 (fine and very fine) and two different dwell times (45 sec and 180 sec). The dry coffee dose (6.5 g) and water used (109 g @ 200F) were kept as constant as possible. This is close to the "ideal" SCAA 6% brew ratio. The 6.5 g dose was selected because it was the same coffee mass per sq. cm. of Aeropress filter area as a typical 32 g dose would be in a Clover.

Each press was stirred gently for 10 sec at the beginning, left alone, then pressed at the end of the appropriate dwell time. Each cup of coffee was given a quick taste. The pucks were carefully oven-dried and weighed to determine solubles yield (what percent of the puck was washed away into the beverage).

In terms of the numbers, I had no trouble extracting recommended soluble yields in 45 seconds. In terms of taste, they all offered good body and pleasing Yrgacheffe aromas. In general the 180 sec extractions tasted "overextracted": harsh, acrid flavor notes in varying degrees. Next time I will try slightly coarser grind settings.

Note: opinion follows:

This test is just one tiny data point, but after doing this I have no trouble believing that paired with a high quality grinder, Clover brewers can perform adequate extractions with 40-45 sec dwell times. I also believe that given the excellent control offered by the Clover, motivated baristas will tweak the extraction parameters and find "sweet spots" offering excellent tasting coffee. It may be that a 45 sec extraction can never be tweaked to taste exactly like a 3-4 min extraction, but that doesn't mean it can't taste great.

I also believe that people who try this with grinders that are less than top-grade may be disappointed. In other words, like everywhere else in coffee, the grinder is key.
-AndyS
AndyS
 
Posts: 631
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by cannonfodder on Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:09 am

Nice information. It never ceases to amaze me; sometimes the seemingly simple test/measurements take the longest time. I have never heard about the inverted Aeropress, could you elaborate?

I had my first Clover experience at Grumpy café and I found it very good, one of the best cups I have enjoyed actually. It reminded me of a French press but with slightly less body and brighter, not to mention void of sediment. Having had very limited exposure to the clover, I can say that the baristas I met had a cheat sheet for each coffee with a specific dose/grind setting and brew temperature. I think that would qualify as barista tweaked.

You could always take your TDS meter down to the café and see if they would humor you and provide you with the needed numbers and check the TDS on a cup from the Clover.

At $10K+ each, I don't know why everyone does not have one in the kitchen, right beside their GS3.
:roll:
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3687
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh
www.chriscoffee.com: quality & service, second to none
www.chriscoffee.com: quality & service, second to none

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by Ken Fox on Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:42 am

Great work, Andy, as always! Unfortunately, I am too dumb to ask an intelligent question about this, so I'll just leave it at that.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1057
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by RapidCoffee on Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:52 am

cannonfodder wrote:I have never heard about the inverted Aeropress, could you elaborate?

Rasqual (Scott) seems to have pioneered this method, perhaps the best description is here. Basically, the paper filter gets replaced with a polyester (or metal) filter, to avoid absorbing coffee oils. Inverting the AeroPress allows you to extract the bloom oils without losing them in the puck. But it's messy.

cannonfodder wrote:I had my first Clover experience at Grumpy café...

Same here. Panama Honey Bean, very tasty, although not the magical experience I had with their espresso.

cannonfodder wrote:You could always take your TDS meter down to the café and see if they would humor you and provide you with the needed numbers and check the TDS on a cup from the Clover.

That always struck me as an easier way to measure extraction (TDS vs. weighing pucks). Perhaps I'm missing something (happens frequently enough :roll:).

Andy, thanks for running these tests. Nice work, as usual.
John
User avatar
RapidCoffee
 
Posts: 1045
Joined: Dec 11, 2005
Location: Rapid City, SD

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by Matthew Brinski on Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:37 am

AndyS wrote:, but after doing this I have no trouble believing that paired with a high quality grinder, Clover brewers can perform adequate extractions with 40-45 sec dwell times.


Andy,

With your results obviously demonstrating that the desired soluables yield can be achieved via Clover'ish brew parameters, I wonder why the accepted and seemingly necessary high dosing practices by the current Clover users. It may be more appropriate for me to ask this question on Coffeed.clover, but have you witnessed the use of the Clover with "normal" dosing parameters that achieved acceptable results?

I ask because I wonder if we are getting more into the which soluables that are preferable in the cup rather than just the how much of a certain standard. Are the the higher dosing practices we have become accustomed to, whether by Clover, espresso, vac pot, etc., the result of our preference for the contents of coffee which are more readily soluable? Are we trying to get more of them when the brew/extraction process allows us some control to do so?

I have been thinking about this since I have been dosing rather high along with a pretty coarse grind when using my Chemex. If this is where our current trends are taking us, it seems that our previously accepted "standards" may become obsolete.

I am out of the country right now, so I apologize if I don't reply immediately after you inform me that everything I have stated is completely idiotic.
Matthew Brinski
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Feb 02, 2006
Location: Woodland Park, Colorado

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by AndyS on Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:50 am

RapidCoffee wrote:That always struck me as an easier way to measure extraction (TDS vs. weighing pucks). Perhaps I'm missing something (happens frequently enough :roll:)


1. It is MUCH easier for brewed coffee, if one has the right TDS meter! I don't, mine lacks the required sensitivity by a factor of 10. :-(
2. Given the proper sensitivity, a TDS meter still measures solubles yield indirectly, whereas the tedious puck-drying method is a direct measurement. I don't understand the various factors behind converting TDS measurements into solubles yield, but I would like to, particularly for espresso.
-AndyS
AndyS
 
Posts: 631
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by cannonfodder on Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:30 pm

I have a Eutech instruments/Oakton instruments TDSTester11 which has a resolution of 10ppm or 0.10ppt with a range of 2000 ppm and 10.00ppt with a +- or 1% of scale. Unfortunately the scale you need is ppm which leaves you with 10.0ppm resolution. Don't know if that is any better than what you have but you are welcome to use it if you want.

In your test, did you subtract the water hardness from the TDS to get actual TDS from the extraction or is that extraction TDS plus water hardness?
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3687
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by King Seven on Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:00 pm

AndyS wrote:I don't understand the various factors behind converting TDS measurements into solubles yield, but I would like to, particularly for espresso.


The maths for brewed coffee would go something like this:

(Assumptions for the maths - each gram of coffee will retain about 2ml of water)

So for the following brew

60g/l so:
2 litres of water brewed
120g of coffee

After the brewing if we assume 20% extraction:

2ml per g of water retained by the coffee bed = 240ml retained, 1760ml brewed coffee
20% of the 120g of coffee extracted = 24g

24g as a percentage of 1760 = 1.36% strength (total dissolved solids)

Here are some badly drawn lines on the chart to back it up.

Image

The maths is pretty basic, and the 2ml/g retained seems to have been well documented since the CBC.

With espresso I guess the maths is similar - not sure about water retained by the coffee off the top of my head though.
King Seven
 
Posts: 106
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: London

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by cannonfodder on Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:59 pm

With the Scace device, you pull 3 ounces of water to simulate a 2 ounce shot assuming that the coffee cake will retain one ounce of liquid. I have not done any kind of test to verify but if Greg says it is so, I am inclined to believe him.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3687
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by King Seven on Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:05 pm

But is that a 14g puck or a 24g one?
King Seven
 
Posts: 106
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: London

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by cannonfodder on Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:13 pm

Hmm, good question. I always assumed it was 14g. Maybe Eric could shed some light on the issue, or I could weigh out a basket with 14 grams in the puck, pull a 2 ounce shot then weigh the basket again to see how much weight it gained, minus the dissolved solids.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3687
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by cannonfodder on Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:20 pm

Well, I just weighed out a 14 gram dose on my 0.1g scale. I pulled a 2 ounce shot by weight then weighed the basket after the shot. It gained 17.2 grams which equates to 0.6 ounces. So my 14 gram puck that had a 2 ounce shot pulled through it gained 0.6 ounces in water. Now that was only one shot and one measurement which is statistically insignificant and does not take the extracted solids into account.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3687
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by luca on Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:40 pm

AndyS wrote:1. It is MUCH easier for brewed coffee, if one has the right TDS meter! I don't, mine lacks the required sensitivity by a factor of 10. :-(


Excuses; excuses! Just brew ten times as much coffee, then boil to reduce the volume to a tenth ;P

Great work, as usual, Andy.

Cheers,

Luca
User avatar
luca
 
Posts: 361
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by AndyS on Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:43 pm

cannonfodder wrote:I have a Eutech instruments/Oakton instruments TDSTester11 which has a resolution of 10ppm or 0.10ppt with a range of 2000 ppm and 10.00ppt with a +- or 1% of scale. Unfortunately the scale you need is ppm which leaves you with 10.0ppm resolution. Don't know if that is any better than what you have but you are welcome to use it if you want.?


You are very generous to make that offer, thank you. I'm gonna buy one myself because you never know when your life might depend on an accurate TDS reading. :-)

cannonfodder wrote:In your test, did you subtract the water hardness from the TDS to get actual TDS from the extraction or is that extraction TDS plus water hardness?


I didn't subtract it because the crummy TDS meter I used read zero when dipped in plain water.
-AndyS
AndyS
 
Posts: 631
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by AndyS on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:10 pm

King Seven wrote:
The maths for brewed coffee would go something like this:

<snip>

the 2ml/g retained seems to have been well documented since the CBC.

<snip>

With espresso I guess the maths is similar - not sure about water retained by the coffee off the top of my head though.


James, thanks very much for the clear explanation. What I'm fuzzy on is the relationship between "solubles" and "insolubles." Last year when Jim Schulman and I did our studies on solids extraction in espresso, we measured the total amount of coffee material removed from the puck. This presumably included both solubles and insolubles (I guess insolubles might include suspended solids and oils).

On the other hand, the method you present appears to consider only soluble matter, which I presume is what a TDS meter measures exclusively.

I suppose it's possible that in filtered, drip coffee the amount of insolubles is very small, but as you raise the brew pressure and/or use coarser filters the amount might increase to a significant amount.

Am I making any sense? It's late and I'm going to bed now (more excuses).

BTW, I just measured an Aeropress puck before and after: 6.5 g before, 15 g after.
-AndyS
AndyS
 
Posts: 631
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by King Seven on Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:52 pm

I think the problem with the espresso puck and the amount it absorbs is the sucking effect of the solenoid valve.

I think with espresso drying pucks is the only way to get an accurate read on % extracted. That said, with a TDS you could reverse engineer the amount of water used with some basic maths and then maybe link it in to an accurate volumetric pad and see if you can set up a constant water amount, at which point you could use that and TDS and know your extractions.

Does that make sense?

(still struggling with my Chemex and some TDS measurements)

As for undissolved stuff - probably more important with espresso as I'd guy paper filtration removes a lot of the undissolved. That is pretty much guesswork though...
King Seven
 
Posts: 106
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: London

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by AndyS on Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:07 pm

King Seven wrote:I think with espresso drying pucks is the only way to get an accurate read on % extracted.


I think you're right. With espresso, meters are quick, easy, and probably not very accurate. On the other hand, drying and weighing pucks is accurate but really tedious.

In other words, the tedious method is more accurate than the TDS method. :twisted:
-AndyS
AndyS
 
Posts: 631
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by Abe Carmeli on Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:40 am

AndyS wrote: several group members were extremely skeptical that coffee could be properly brewed in the Clover's abbreviated time cycle.


The thing with the Clover is that people who taste it in coffee shops, like Grumpy, have not tried the same coffee brewed traditionally using a press pot (with no press) such as the Eva Solo or even straight filter brew.

On a Visit to George Howel's Terroir, Jim Schulman, George Howel, Peter Lynagh & I did that experiment. We brewed the same coffee using the Clover against the Eva Solo and the Technivorm. The Eva Solo came first, the Technivorm second and the Clover came last by a large margin. Now, does that prove that the Clover will always finish last? No. But it is the first time I had an opportunity to do any impartial comparison. With so little independent research on that machine, it will always be treated with suspicion.

Nice Work.
Abe Carmeli
Abe Carmeli
 
Posts: 736
Joined: May 08, 2005
Location: New York, NY

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by peacecup on Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:59 am

AndyS wrote:Sometimes the hardest step in doing an experiment is deciding WHAT IT IS that you're going to test.


Well, that's science. And the science of coffee is certainly in its infancy. What I'd like to ask in relation to this (and its probably been asked before) is WHAT PARTS of the extraction make up WHAT PARTS of the brew (espresso in my case). I.e., are the early moments of the extraction all sweet and rosy, and the later moments bitter? When is the caffeine extracted - is it linear or curvilinear (negative, positive, sigmoid)? How about the inner vs. outer surfaces of a coffee bean? The point is a very fine grind might be extracted all the way through, whereas a coarser grinder would not.

PC
LMWDP #049
Hand-ground, hand-pulled: "hands down.."
User avatar
peacecup
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Karlstad, Sweden

Link to "Solubles Yield as a function of Grind and Dwell Time"by barry on Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:18 am

cannonfodder wrote:With the Scace device, you pull 3 ounces of water to simulate a 2 ounce shot assuming that the coffee cake will retain one ounce of liquid. I have not done any kind of test to verify but if Greg says it is so, I am inclined to believe him.



Recommendation is 75ml to simulate 60ml shot volume. This was based on a series of extractions I did during the development of the USBC testing protocol where I weighed baskets before and after extraction. I don't recall the dose weight offhand, but I'm pretty sure the retention was approximately 1ml/g of grounds, so the dose would have been in the 14g to 15g range.


Hey! I found the data!

The test was done on 12/17/04. Dose was approximately 18g and water retained was approximately 17.5g. We normalized the amount to 15ml to be in line with the 7g - 30ml single and 14g - 60ml double, also taking into consideration the test measuring vessels were most likely to be marked in 5ml increments rather than 1ml increments.
User avatar
barry
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: St Louis, MO

Next

Return to Tips and Techniques