mattwells wrote:Welcome Kikuchio.
I used to be a regular here, but with law school in full swing I only get to check in every now and then.
These guys are definitely helpful, but they will need some more information to make good recommendations. Are you making mostly milk-based drinks or straight espresso? Will you be making multiples back to back (to back to back....)? Do you want/need a hot water nozzle?
All of these things will influence your choices.
Give us some more info, and we will give you some.
Matt Wells
Hmmm, I used a Silvia for 3&1/2 years and she was quite capable of pulling ristrettos. Since the Audrey is basically the same machine with plastic exterior and smaller reservoir any problem pulling ristettos more likely on the handle side of the PF (which could include the grinder).kikuchio wrote:matt wells
i appreciate your response
i probably make about 60 % milk based drinks at present but one of the reasons for upgrading is to be able to make ristrettos and improve my espresso. i seldom do more than 3 or 4 back to back.
hot water nozzle sounds nice but i've never had one so i guess it would not be essential.
i do not think i have the knowledge to make some of the modifications to the machine that some of the others have described.
i will not be able to plumb in the machine at present.
thank you
k

miKe mcKoffee wrote:Hmmm, I used a Silvia for 3&1/2 years and she was quite capable of pulling ristrettos. Since the Audrey is basically the same machine with plastic exterior and smaller reservoir any problem pulling ristettos more likely on the handle side of the PF (which could include the grinder).
Question, how old is your MDF? (as in approx' how many pounds ground) Have you replaced the burrs recently, or ever? All burrs dull gradually. And as the burrs dull grind becomes more inconsistent and ristrettos do become more difficult to dial in especially with a stepped grinder like the MDF. I know with a Rocky very noticable grind improvement replacing the burrs after only 100#. (On 4th set of burrs in 4&1/2 years) Before looking to buy a new espresso machine make sure the rest of the equation is in order. And in truth the MDF is pretty low end for attempting fine tuning espresso shots even with good sharp burrs, lower end than even Rocky. (I've recently added a Mazzer SJ for stepless fine tuning shots though)
That said milk based drinks mucho easier to make with an HX or DB machine. Plus shot temp management much easier and more accurate with HX (and of course DB), especially back to back shots with and/or without steaming between shots.
Also any specific machine recommendations would be mute without knowing a budget range.
Checked a couple of the usual and only found WLL with MDF replacement burrs. Even if considering getting a newer more adjustable grinder I'd still spring the $28.75 for new burrs.kikuchio wrote:MDF has seen many pounds of use and, indeed it's performance seems to have declined over time. I wasn't aware that the burrs could be replaced. Is this something i can do myself? Where are replacements available? even if i do the replacement, which seems necessary, i think that a newer, and preferably doserless, grinder is on my wish list .
New grinder wise tough to say, pros & cons with about all, be sure and check out HB's [url=http://home-barista.com/feature-spotlight-grinders.html]Feature Spotlightwith respect to the machine, i have read and reread the reviews on HB and am fairly convinced that i would like to upgrade. part of my question lies in how do choose between the DB and HX machines, or a lever machine, assuming a particular price point. (let's say between 1500 and 2k for a new machine and grinder, if that's possible)
kikuchio

miKe mcKoffee wrote:New grinder wise tough to say, pros & cons with about all, be sure and check out HB's [url=http://home-barista.com/feature-spotlight-grinders.html]Feature Spotlight
on Espresso Grinders.[/url]
Espresso machine wise even tougher choices! First there's DB vs HX. After temp surfing Silvia for 2+ years before adding PID I swore I'd never surf again. I'd heard HX machines required surfing so were out of the question leaving DBs, or so I thought. Last November was talking to to Chris about the then rumored up and coming direct connect PID temp controlled rotary Quick Mill (that has since died in project) when he mentioned a rotary Bricoletta he'd let me have at a steal. (like $549 off list) But it was HX so I didn't say yes. Spent the next 6 hours or so re-reading everything I could find on HX machines, in particular multiple reads of Chris Tacy's Pro's review of the same Bricoletta, andthe light bulb turned on. HX surfing is not only different than surfing Silvia but also very accurate and perfect for my consumption style. Namely often pulling back to backs of different beans requiring different temps, easily done with HX. Zero regrets 9 months later, every shot I pull can be pulled anywhere from 194 to 207f on demand, + or - 1f max variance accuracy. There are many excellent HX machine choices to choose from, often the deciding factor what you want to see looking back at you from your counter day after day for years.
Still DBs obviously easier to pull at a given shot temp, but prosumer choices all but limited to two options, neither of which I'm too keen on for different reasons.
If you can go direct connect, DO IT! (Once having a rotary I'll never go back to vibed) Bricoletta or Vetrano paired with Mazzer or Macap easily in your budget.
randomperson wrote:Having gone through this decision process very recently, I'll chime in and tell you what some of the considerations are between the double boiler machine and HX machines.
1. If you can't plumb in your machine, you are limited to the Expobar Brewtus in double boiler machines. On the other hand, there are many many fine HX machines to choose from in your price range, so you can choose based on size and footprint, aesthetics, features, and so on.
2. If you are after complete simplicity, the double boiler Brewtus might make more sense, since the flushing required is very simple. On the other hand, despite all my own misgivings (and humiliating threads on Home Barista!) I found that the HX flush is really not that complicated at all! After a good deal of experimentation, I've pretty well dialed things in to my satisfaction -- and I've only had La Valentina for two weeks! That said, if you like trying lots of different coffees, I'm sure the Brewtus would make it easier to hit that perfect temperature for every blend, every time. You'd still have to experiment some to get there, but then you just select your temp and go.
3. If you are concerned about water freshness, probably the HX machines make more sense, as water for the HX is drawn from the reservoir rather than from the boiler. With the double boiler machines, the water sits in the boiler until you use it. So for low volume home use, the water could get stale -- which may or may not affect the taste of the coffee, and may or may not be of much importance to you.
4. If you are concerned about quality of components and reliability over time, you might want to consider the innards of your selected machine. My impression is that some of the HX machines (like La Valentina and others) use better components than others. I was very concerned about the Sirai pressurestat, for example -- as other pressurestats may have higher failure rates. It was a key reason I chose La Valentina over Brewtus -- Whole Latte Love could not answer my question about the brand of pressurestat that is in the Brewtus.
5. Looks matter! These are very large machines -- they make quite a statement in your kitchen! So choose something that you won't mind looking at -- and may even love looking at!
Anyway, as many have said here -- all these machines in this price class make fantastic espresso. You will be happy with any of them, I'm sure. But have some fun obsessing over your choice -- hell, we all did!
randomperson wrote:3. If you are concerned about water freshness, probably the HX machines make more sense, as water for the HX is drawn from the reservoir rather than from the boiler. With the double boiler machines, the water sits in the boiler until you use it. So for low volume home use, the water could get stale -- which may or may not affect the taste of the coffee, and may or may not be of much importance to you.
I think the Cunill would be more a lateral move than an upgrade.kikuchio wrote:Thank you for the information, the replacement burrs are on the way!
i still think there is likely a new grinder in my future. do you have anything to say about Cunill?
Ya lost me, what does PID temp control modification have to do with stock direct water connect and rotary pump?Although you make it sound very tempting, for now the direct connect / rotary option is not feasable. As i think i indicated, i don't feel capable of doing something like a PID modification so i must focus on other options.
GS3 & M3I am grateful for any further suggestions
kikuchio

Dogshot wrote:After reading recent repetitive posts about water staleness, I think the concept could use some further conceptualization. For example, what is stale water, what makes it stale, and what 'refreshes' it? What does stale water taste like?
I have an RO filter for drinking water. Since the RO filter can't produce sufficient water on-demand, water sits in a container after being filtered, waiting for me to use it. And yet it taste way better than my tap water. Also, I have never noticed it to taste 'stale'.
So, is it water that has acquired a taste from being in a container? If so, a reservoir machine will not solve your problem unless you completely change the reservoir water very often.
Is it water that has been still for some time? If so, for how long, and what refreshes it? Does using bottled water, or water pumped from a large container qualify as stale water?
Does temperature increase staleness, or does water have to boil before temperature affects staleness?
Staleness has been referred to lately with no indication of what that actually means. Where the taste of water coming from the grouphead is concerned, I find that machine cleanliness is by far the greatest factor.
Mark
By Brut do you mean Brewtus? Brewtus brew boiler smallish and only a couple quick flushes to clear old water? It's got a 1.7L brew boiler so two loooooong flushes maybe! But would be true for the S1.cannonfodder wrote:Depends on the machine. Something like the Brut, the brew boiler is smallish. Two quick flushes and it is cleared of the old water.

cannonfodder wrote:Depends on the machine. Something like the Brut, the brew boiler is smallish. Two quick flushes and it is cleared of the old water. Yes I know the entire point behind a double boiler is to eliminate the need for a cooling or heating flush, but a couple of quick flushes while preparing your portafilter will take care of the stale water. On a big commercial machine, you would need gobs of flushing. However a commercial machine is designed for a commercial environment. In that setting the water is being flushed out via shots all the time.
One of the benefits of a HX is that the heat exchanger is always being flushed with cooling shots. The heat exchangers on my Faema are large enough to qualify as a small boiler, I do huge flushes on it. A big flush before I start (6+ oz) then grind and dose, flush another 4oz'ish tamp flush another 2-4oz lock and go.
miKe mcKoffee wrote:By Brut do you mean Brewtus? Brewtus brew boiler smallish and only a couple quick flushes to clear old water? It's got a 1.7L brew boiler so two loooooong flushes maybe! But would be true for the S1.