TUS172 wrote:How does one respond to this and similar statements in this post? Abrasive? Condescending?
I hear you, but choose to focus on his point and less on the manner of presentation.
The Olympias are indeed pricey, but anyone can recognize their materials and workmanship are in a different league. For example, the Elektra Microcasa a Leva sells for $1089. It's a finely made machine, but the fit and finish of the Olympia Cremina 2002 are well beyond it. If you're the sort who will pay a high premium for expert craftsmanship and have the funds, a new Olympia may be worth thinking about.
Some pay thousands of dollars for a premium wristwatch; I wouldn't. I paid thousands of dollars for a grinder; most would not. I say "to each his own."
bobcraige wrote:While they have based it on the exceptional design of the Cremina 67, the current machine is a quantum leap better quality than its ancestors.
IIRC, you've mentioned some of the innovations in previous threads, but they were primarily in the area of maintainability and durable design, not improving the in-cup result. As a point of interest, Steve had the Olympia Cremina 2002 and his restored Olympia 67 side-by-side for months. He prefers the espressos from the older model, though he agrees the newer has superior design features and construction.