www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you

My first nekkid' pull - Page 2

Want to talk espresso but not sure which forum? If so, this is the right one.

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by Worldman on Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:36 am

RapidCoffee wrote:In my experience, "flo-cones" are associated with fast extraction rates, not coffee characteristics.


hmmm...maybe I should time a shot or two to see where it is. "...fast extraction rates," INDEED!

Len
User avatar
Worldman
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by RapidCoffee on Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:56 am

Worldman wrote:hmmm...maybe I should time a shot or two to see where it is. "...fast extraction rates," INDEED!

No offense intended, my friend. But yes, that was my way of saying that your grind may be a bit coarse. With a such a large cone-shaped flow, I'd fine up the grind, and try to achieve the flow geometry illustrated in the Dave (Cannonfodder)'s beautiful pic.
User avatar
RapidCoffee
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Dec 11, 2005
Location: Rapid City, SD
espresso machines at 1st-line.com
espresso machines at 1st-line.com

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by cannonfodder on Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:11 am

I have also gotten an enormous cone from overly fresh beans. There is so much gas still in the bean that it produces a 'crema gusher'. I had one blend I tried, one day out of roast. The cone was so large it almost touched the cup. I just stood there laughing, it was hilarious to watch. It took about 7 seconds to fill a 6oz cup and flowed over the top. Then all that crema went flat in just a few seconds and left me with about 1oz of roofing tar in the cup.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 4097
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by Worldman on Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:58 am

Well, I timed myself and was pulling a 2 oz. double in ~22 seconds. This is, I suppose, a tad fast - but not grossly so. I will tighten up the grind for the next event.

Len
User avatar
Worldman
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by Worldman on Mon Jul 03, 2006 4:57 pm

I tightened up the grind (only 1 notch on the Cunill) & used a more robust tamping pressure. The result was ~33 seconds for 2oz. double.
User avatar
Worldman
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by RapidCoffee on Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:47 pm

So... any change in the geometry of the flow?

You're certainly in the ballpark, time-wise, and your beans aren't overly fresh. Maybe Dan was right, and it was the blend after all.
User avatar
RapidCoffee
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Dec 11, 2005
Location: Rapid City, SD

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by Worldman on Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:05 pm

RapidCoffee wrote:So... any change in the geometry of the flow?

You're certainly in the ballpark, time-wise, and your beans aren't overly fresh. Maybe Dan was right, and it was the blend after all.


RC, the cone is not as deep...but I only pulled a couple of shots after the change and will check more closely tomorrow.

Len
User avatar
Worldman
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by HB on Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:12 pm

RapidCoffee wrote:In my experience, "flo-cones" are associated with fast extraction rates, not coffee characteristics.

Below is an example of the cone size for two different coffees that prompted my comment. The larger of the two cones is the Yemen, and yet it was roasted a week ago. It would balloon more dramatically if it were only three days post-roast. Volumes and pace of the two extractions aren't exactly the same, but close enough to consider them equivalent.

Intelligentsia Yemen, roasted one week ago:


Counter Culture Coffee Toscano, roasted four days ago:


(More videos in One week with the La Marzocco GS3).
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 7589
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Link to "My first nekkid' pull"by Worldman on Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:41 am

Here was a shot pulled on 4 July. The cone is not as deep as it had been but they are mostly less deep now...I think it looks luscious...mmmmm!

She started like this:
Image

Developed into this:
Image
You can see that the cone was pretty deep here. However, this didn't last too long.

It quickly changed to this:
Image

And ended thusly:
Image

Do you guys think I need to tighten up the grind and/or tamp still further?

Here are the resultant beverages:
Image
Image

Dan, a digi video camera sure would be more, um..."descriptive".

Len
User avatar
Worldman
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh

Previous

Return to Knockbox