by malachi on Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:31 pm
Glad you had the chance to go to the Annex.
Tasting those coffees - either cupped or from the Clover - is a wondeful opportunity.
As for the different machines...
There are some generalized differences in flavour between the two.
That being said - the truth is that what you're tasting as the difference is largely due to factors unrelated to the manufacturer of the machine.
I don't know which non-Stumptown bars you went to, but you're going to see a ton of variance between the Stumptown bars and other bars on attributes including:
- type of grinder
- dose
- target extraction time and volume
- brew temp
- brew pressure
The list above is going to account for more than 75% of the differences - even if you're talking about Albina Press vs Stumptown (where you see the most similarity in values, training, etc).
In response to you question, however, if you taste shots of Hairbender pulled by a Stumptown barista on the Linea in the Roastery (which is managed by Stumptown tech staff and calibrated the same as the Mistrals) you will likely find the shots are less "dense" on the palate and tend to have dominance on the high and low ends of the flavour profile. The shots from a Mistral, on the other hand, seem to have a dominant mid-reach and great depth and concentration of flavour.
The Mistral is not simply a Linea in a nice case. Kees creates a whole new machine - just starting with some of the LM parts (which he modifies in most cases) and then replacing other of the LM components with new parts.
The most signficant changes have to do with water debit and flow rate along with temp stability.
"Taste is the only morality." -- John Ruskin