I have only a little more than 24 hrs to get one! the special edition HB3 one.
Cafesp
HB wrote:Sorry, I have no idea which is best for drip coffee since they're designed with espresso in mind. If I was shopping for a dedicated drip grinder of similar caliber, I would choose a doserless Rocky Rancilio. It has good solid construction and is easy to adjust. Depending on the humidity in your area, static can be a problem for Rocky, but it's manageable.
IMAWriter wrote:Dan...have to agree totally with you on this....
I owned a Rocky DL for a year....multi-purpose...It did an awesome job on vac and press pot..as well as drip...the press pot grind was even better than on my pristine SJ. I now use a Solis Maestro for all but espresso...serves my needs.Another reason the Rocky would also be a great choice for the OP as it would serve as an alt espresso grinder in the (un) likely event the Cimbali fails.
scalla wrote:I'm looking make my Mini E for espresso only and had come to this same conclusion. Curious as to why you now use a Maestro? How does it compare to the Rocky?
another_jim wrote:Espresso grinders are designed to produce fines, and thereby do worse for brewed coffees than grinders designed specifically to produce no or few fines like the large Ditting or Mahlkoenig grinders. I would think even a grinder designed for supermarkets, like the Bunn [...] would do better for drip or any steeping method.
CafSuperCharged wrote:Guys, please read Jim Schulman's (another_jim) input and take it seriously.
Regards
Peter
CafSuperCharged wrote:If that is not enough, read the Titan Grinder threads (the Bench) on analysis of particle distribution, shape, etc. and the relation to taste.
As to Jim's remark "or any steeping method", I am not sure about Turkish coffee the grind of which is finer than espresso. It might require a Mahlkoenig type of burr with the ability to go fine enough yet without the espresso grinder particle distribution with two bumps (at two different sizes), which would confirm what he says.
IMAWriter wrote:[...] this topic [...] silly.
another_jim wrote:My experience trying to use a Mahlkoenig, which produces no fines, for espresso, is what really drove this home. For my first shot, I set the grind for espresso fineness (discernible graininess between the fingers, but powder appearance). I got the correct 6 to 7 second dwell time, but then came a gush that was pretty well indistinguishable from having no puck at all (except it formed a cone in the bottomless). I kept making the grind finer. By the time it hit Turkish, I got a flow rate appropriate to espresso; but I had to wait over a minute for the first drop to appear. None of these shots tasted like espresso, just like strong coffee; the espresso mouthfeel was entirely absent.
Teme's Espresso Passione wrote:[...] Yes, I am still very happy indeed with the K30 - more so than with any of my previous grinders.
I do note that I use the naked PF less than I did with the conical grinders that I had because the K30 is less forgiving than they were. The shots also tend to go blonde earlier than with the conicals.
Nevertheless, once you get the dose and grind dialed in, it is good. Very good. Definitely better than the Rocky, MiniE or even the Casadio that I owned. The Compak was better in terms of the taste but a lot less user friendly. So I am happy. Others who have done comparisons between these grinders may disagree (I know that the casadio is popular in Germany), but I am happy with my choice.
IMAWriter wrote:
...Edit....again, I must say, I find the subject (title) of this thread to be most silly,but I always endeavor to respond to a legitimate post.
CafSuperCharged wrote:Which makes me wonder, professore Schulman, caffè esp. h.c., if you refer to another model, maybe, or Teemu was in an euphoric pride of ownership state of denial when he wrote this.