www.dailygrind.com: artisian roasted coffee and espresso equipment

Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony? - Page 5

Grinders are one of the keys to exceptional espresso. Discuss them here.

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Teme on Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:36 pm

HughF wrote:That's odd - I wanted a timer MXK but couldn't get one, their Web site doesn't show anything other than manual (one big On-Off switch) and I checked this with Macap via my UK dealer. Mine is definitely manual - it arrived in December 2006 I think.

Yes, it is a bit odd. Anyway, this is no longer a concern for me as I put in an order for a Casadio Instantaneo AND a Compak K10 WBC.

I was actually surprised to see that the Compak is not much taller than the Macap MXK and it is shorter than the Kony. The interesting thing is that the K10 grinds twice as fast as the Kony despite the lower rpm (300 rpm in the WBC spec, but it still does a 18 gram double in less than 7 secs).

I should be receiving the grinders shortly after I return from my Easter break in Finland... I can hardly wait...

Br,
Teme
User avatar
Teme
 
Posts: 305
Joined: May 07, 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Matthew on Tue May 15, 2007 5:02 pm

Hi all, hope you don't mind me kicking this thread up a bit. 8)

Allthough I was pretty much set on a Macap M4 stepless, doubts start filling my mind as in: Why not go Conical ?... :o

So then their is a shortlist:
Compak K-10
Versalab M3
Mazzer Kony
Macap MXK(R)

Compak K-10:
Probably not, because there is not enough info on it and its (very) hard to get in Europe / Amsterdam.

Versalab M3
Probably not. Gave it a long and hard look, like all the positive stories about how it actually does what a grinder should do however I would have to import it from the USA and thats a bit cumbersome (paying taxes and reclaiming tax and so on) not in the least because there are some doubts about its build quality. In case of warranty the USA/Europe thing makes it more complicated.
A shame because it probably fits my needs for modest espresso / cappuccino use best.

Mazzer Kony
Read quite a few positive stories about it.
Downsides:
- it is VERY big.
- as I understand it, it does not have an on/off switch but automatically grinds until the doser is full.
- as I understand it, it is not (easily) possible to mod it into a doserless model and or hopperless model

Outstanding questions:
On Mazzer's site http://www.mazzer.com/second.asp?menu=2 the following is mentioned:
Conical grinding blades
- single phase (ref. 191C) ø 63 (2½ inches)
- three phases (ref. 192C) ø 67 mm
What is the difference between single and three phase? Is it important? Does it differ in price? (I have a quote on a Kony but I don't know whether it is single or three phases.)

Furthermore does the Kony have a burr system like the Versalab M3 where Conical burrs force the beans into Flat burrs breaking them as they enter?

Macap MXK(R)
Looks like a good candidate. Also positive stories about this one. It's big but can fit a M4 hopper.
Downsides:
- Less well available in Europe (spare parts/burrs)
- Less well known / established

Questions:
Does anyone know whether the Macap MXK Conical grinder works the same as the Kony, ie does it have the same sort of blade setup ?
Although I'm waiting on a price quote I'm expecting it to be quite a bit cheaper than the Kony because of the price difference in the USA.
What is better about the Kony that warrants such a price gap? Just the name? Since the M4 is rated equal to the Mini E I would expect the MXK to be similar to the Kony.


I hope that the Conical grinder review or Conical vs Flat burrs which I read about somewhere in these threads will be up soon however it will probably to late for me to educate me on my decision. :cry:

Sorry for the long post, hopefully someone has some insights. And if not, well thanks anyway for all that I have been able to learn on this great site.

Best Regards
Matt
Matthew
 
Posts: 15
Joined: May 07, 2007
Location: The Netherlands (Europe)
www.greatinfusions.com: espresso cups and barista gear, showroom in Santa Cruz
www.greatinfusions.com: espresso cups and barista gear, showroom in Santa Cruz

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Teme on Tue May 15, 2007 5:49 pm

Matthew wrote:Compak K-10:
Probably not, because there is not enough info on it and its (very) hard to get in Europe / Amsterdam.

It's not that hard to find, it's cheaper than the Kony, faster, a tad smaller (shorter if you chop the hopper) and the doser should be better than that on the Mazzer. Two WBC champs like it a lot (more so than the Kony). Enough credentials for me. Mine is finally on the way and I'm hoping to receive it before the weekend.

Matthew wrote:Versalab M3
Probably not.

This is what I decided as well. The most recent improvements make the M3 even more interesting than before but it still remains a bit impractical afaik. The price is also pretty steep when you ship it to Europe and pay the taxes and duties (you are looking at close to 1500 euros).

Matthew wrote:Mazzer Kony
Read quite a few positive stories about it.

A good grinder without a doubt. A bit slow, though.

Matthew wrote:Furthermore does the Kony have a burr system like the Versalab M3 where Conical burrs force the beans into Flat burrs breaking them as they enter?

No, the M3 is the only one of these grinders with the hybrid flat-conical burrs. The rest are all conical. Afaik, no bean feed issues with the conicals.

Matthew wrote:Macap MXK(R)
Looks like a good candidate. Also positive stories about this one. It's big but can fit a M4 hopper.
Downsides:
- Less well available in Europe (spare parts/burrs)
- Less well known / established

The Macap is easily available in Europe. What has been confusing for me is that some sources say that it is only available with the auto-grind function whereas other say that you also have a manual version. You would clearly want the manual version for home use.

Other downsides: The Macap is slow (if that matters to you) and I have also read some negative experiences about the taste profile the Macap produces in the cup.

Matthew wrote:Questions:
Does anyone know whether the Macap MXK Conical grinder works the same as the Kony, ie does it have the same sort of blade setup ?

Yes.

Matthew wrote:Although I'm waiting on a price quote I'm expecting it to be quite a bit cheaper than the Kony because of the price difference in the USA.

True. The Kony is around 1075 euros in Europe while you should be able to get the stepless version of the Macap for around 850 (the Compak is around 860 and the WBC spec version is the same price as the Kony).

Matthew wrote:What is better about the Kony that warrants such a price gap? Just the name? Since the M4 is rated equal to the Mini E I would expect the MXK to be similar to the Kony.

I do not rate the Macap M4 as an equal to the Mini-E. They are two very different grinders (doserless with dose timers vs a doser on the M4). For home use I think the Mini-E is superior, but more expensive. For the price, the M4 is great (actually better than the Mazzer doser version imo), but I would avoid the doserless MC4 version.

As for the higher price of the Kony, well, it is a bit faster. Does this matter to you? Also, I have not read anything bad regarding the Kony whereas there have been some negative reports on the Macap as I mentioned earlier.

Matthew wrote:I hope that the Conical grinder review or Conical vs Flat burrs

Me, too :D

Br,
Teme
User avatar
Teme
 
Posts: 305
Joined: May 07, 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by lud on Wed May 16, 2007 2:08 am

Matthew wrote:Compak K-10:
Probably not, because there is not enough info on it and its (very) hard to get in Europe / Amsterdam.

I have only read/heard nothing but positive feedback on the Compak K-10 in terms of its grind quality. To some, it may not be as aesthetically pleasing as some other grinders out there (if that is important to you). If you are planning to spend that much on a grinder, I wouldn't let the difficulty of obtaining one due to geography get in the way. It often makes the purchase that much more satisfying. I have to wait a few months to get my grinder from the US (its being brought over for me into Canada), but believe it or not, I'm saving just under 50% (based on today's exchange rate) by going this route when all is said and done. I had to crunch the numbers a few times because I couldn't believe it myself. :shock:

Matthew wrote:What is better about the Kony that warrants such a price gap? Just the name?

You're probably right. Mazzer brand recognition has afforded them the luxury to rest on their laurels a bit over the past few years, while a few other manufacturers like Compak, and Macap have entered this market, actively solicit feedback from their customers, and quickly gain the respect of many coffee professionals and enthusiasts alike.

It does appear that recently, Mazzer is trying harder to get feedback from their customers. I read that at the recent SCAA Conference, the Mazzer folks were going out of their way to talk to customers as opposed to years past when some felt as if they were being ignored. That's good news for Mazzer, and good news for the industry overall.

Matthew wrote:Mazzer Kony
Downsides:
- it is VERY big.
- as I understand it, it does not have an on/off switch but automatically grinds until the doser is full.
- as I understand it, it is not (easily) possible to mod it into a doserless model and or hopperless model

I too was turned off by its size, but a few weeks ago, I saw the matte black Super Jolly (slightly smaller) sitting beside my beloved LM and it looked sweet.
You may be aware, but there ARE workarounds for the automatic grinding. It depends whether that is acceptable for you vs. going with another machine.
I heard there was a doserless version of the Royal at SCAA. If so, there's a chance that it would fit the slightly smaller Kony as well.

Then there's this new grinder from Elektra that was being showcased at SCAA last week. It sounds intriguing. For my use, I'll never have the need to cool the burrs, but the overall ability to produce a clean grind (ie. with little mess to clean up either inside or outside of the grinder) sounds enticing. Personally, I love the look of it as well. I don't know if production of this is months away, or just around the corner, but if Elektra managed to obtain UL already, it could be sooner rather than later.

Apologies for somewhat one-sided commentary in terms of the grinders. I DON'T have direct experience with the mentioned grinders, but base my opinion on what I picked up during my recent search on an upgrade.

On a parting note:
Matthew wrote:I hope that the Conical grinder review or Conical vs Flat burrs

When I first read Dan's "Feature Spotlight on Espresso Grinders" about eight months ago, my initial thought was, "C'mon. What do I need $700 grinder for?", to "I gotta have that $700 grinder", and now, "That $700 grinder is just not going to cut it." When that showcase on conical vs. flat, or perhaps a Conical Shootout review is written, my bet is that you'll see another flurry of grinder upgrades amongst home enthusiasts. IMO though, the limiting factor of conical's popularity for the home barista is size of the grinder, perhaps more so than then its price.
lud
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Apr 23, 2007
Location: Mississauga, Ontario

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by jesawdy on Wed May 16, 2007 6:49 am

Matthew wrote:Outstanding questions:
On Mazzer's site http://www.mazzer.com/second.asp?menu=2 the following is mentioned:
Conical grinding blades
- single phase (ref. 191C) ø 63 (2½ inches)
- three phases (ref. 192C) ø 67 mm
What is the difference between single and three phase? Is it important? Does it differ in price? (I have a quote on a Kony but I don't know whether it is single or three phases.)


Three-phase refers to the electrical power requirements of the motor installed in the grinder. If you have three-phase power available, three-phase motors are more efficient, so you can get a smaller, cooler and higher powered motor in a smaller form factor for typically significantly less cost.

Here in the US, residences have single-phase power; three-phase power is typically unavailable to the residence and is used in industrial and commercial applications. A phase converter can be bought or made to take single-phase power to three-phase. I am unsure about power distribution in your location.

Depending on the application, phase conversion can make sense.... I know I would consider mucking with it if I had the opportunity to buy a large piece of factory-grade woodworking equipment, like a huge bandsaw, jointer or planer, for a song. For a grinder, probably not, but AndyS has a three-phase Mazzer Robur and phase converter.

see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-phase_electric_power

Furthermore does the Kony have a burr system like the Versalab M3 where Conical burrs force the beans into Flat burrs breaking them as they enter?


As answered above only the Versalab has this configuration of the grinders you are considering. The Cimbali Max grinder has a similar arrangement to the Versalab.
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1595
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by jesawdy on Tue May 22, 2007 6:30 am

Follow-on discussion regarding Compak grinders split to Compak K-10 grinder, availability, opinions? by moderator....
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1595
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Matthew on Thu May 24, 2007 7:42 am

sorry for responding so late. Had a busy time.

Teme wrote:Read quite a few positive stories about it. (kony)

A good grinder without a doubt. A bit slow, though.


Slow(er) is not really a problem for me. I mean, faster is more convenient but its not a dealbreaker.


No, the M3 is the only one of these grinders with the hybrid flat-conical burrs. The rest are all conical. Afaik, no bean feed issues with the conicals.

Thx.

The Macap is easily available in Europe. What has been confusing for me is that some sources say that it is only available with the auto-grind function whereas other say that you also have a manual version. You would clearly want the manual version for home use.

Other downsides: The Macap is slow (if that matters to you) and I have also read some negative experiences about the taste profile the Macap produces in the cup.

....

True. The Kony is around 1075 euros in Europe while you should be able to get the stepless version of the Macap for around 850 (the Compak is around 860 and the WBC spec version is the same price as the Kony).

Well I'm pretty sure that it comes in a manual version since the Macap site says so.

In the meantime I got a quote for the Macap which is a staggering EUR 1099,=. This reseller is quiting the Macap brand so maybe thats an explanation. The Kony was EUR 1050,= which is also more or less my budget.

I do not rate the Macap M4 as an equal to the Mini-E. They are two very different grinders (doserless with dose timers vs a doser on the M4). For home use I think the Mini-E is superior, but more expensive. For the price, the M4 is great (actually better than the Mazzer doser version imo), but I would avoid the doserless MC4 version.

You are right off course. I meant the "mini" and not the Mini-E :oops:



lud wrote:I have only read/heard nothing but positive feedback on the Compak K-10 in terms of its grind quality. To some, it may not be as aesthetically pleasing as some other grinders out there (if that is important to you). If you are planning to spend that much on a grinder, I wouldn't let the difficulty of obtaining one due to geography get in the way. It often makes the purchase that much more satisfying. I have to wait a few months to get my grinder from the US (its being brought over for me into Canada), but believe it or not, I'm saving just under 50% (based on today's exchange rate) by going this route when all is said and done. I had to crunch the numbers a few times because I couldn't believe it myself.

I am inclined to think along the same lines. Nevertheless there is still the issue of i.e. buildquality. I dunno, it doesn't feel right for me. Would it be a grinder which I could pickup locally it would be a different thing. And then there's the budget, assuming that Teme's EUR 1500,- is on the spot.



You're probably right. Mazzer brand recognition has afforded them the luxury to rest on their laurels a bit over the past few years, while a few other manufacturers like Compak, and Macap have entered this market, actively solicit feedback from their customers, and quickly gain the respect of many coffee professionals and enthusiasts alike.

It does appear that recently, Mazzer is trying harder to get feedback from their customers. I read that at the recent SCAA Conference, the Mazzer folks were going out of their way to talk to customers as opposed to years past when some felt as if they were being ignored. That's good news for Mazzer, and good news for the industry overall.

It is probably a fact that the whole grinding/espresso industrie has been sort of a closed not very innovative market for years. This is know changing probably due to all the info on the internet and the increased popularity of espresso among homeusers.

I think there is still a lot to be improved R&D'd both on grinders and espresso. Also the prices, especially for grinders, seem way too high for such a device. Let's hope more Chinese will start drinking espresso and then producing the gear.... :)

I too was turned off by its size, but a few weeks ago, I saw the matte black Super Jolly (slightly smaller) sitting beside my beloved LM and it looked sweet.
You may be aware, but there ARE workarounds for the automatic grinding. It depends whether that is acceptable for you vs. going with another machine.
I heard there was a doserless version of the Royal at SCAA. If so, there's a chance that it would fit the slightly smaller Kony as well.
I read about the workarounds, however if I can buy a grinder without that hassle it would be better. Still the Kony is on my shortlist as it is within budget, sturdy build and it has (supposedly) a good result in the cup.


Then there's this new grinder from Elektra that was being showcased at SCAA last week. It sounds intriguing. For my use, I'll never have the need to cool the burrs, but the overall ability to produce a clean grind (ie. with little mess to clean up either inside or outside of the grinder) sounds enticing. Personally, I love the look of it as well. I don't know if production of this is months away, or just around the corner, but if Elektra managed to obtain UL already, it could be sooner rather than later.
Read about it on coffeegeek and it is interesting indeed. Only, what will be its Time to Market (europe) and the streetprice might be a tad higher than my EUR 1100 budget or so. Which is, when you come to think of it, already ridiculous in some way for a simple motor and a few burrs and chunk of metal housing. :o :shock:

Apologies for somewhat one-sided commentary in terms of the grinders. I DON'T have direct experience with the mentioned grinders, but base my opinion on what I picked up during my recent search on an upgrade.

No problem. Each reply covers another angle of the issue and is helpful in its on way. :)


On a parting note:
When I first read Dan's "Feature Spotlight on Espresso Grinders" about eight months ago, my initial thought was, "C'mon. What do I need $700 grinder for?", to "I gotta have that $700 grinder", and now, "That $700 grinder is just not going to cut it." When that showcase on conical vs. flat, or perhaps a Conical Shootout review is written, my bet is that you'll see another flurry of grinder upgrades amongst home enthusiasts. IMO though, the limiting factor of conical's popularity for the home barista is size of the grinder, perhaps more so than then its price.

It is probably a fact that the whole grinding/espresso industry has been sort of a closed not very innovative market for years. This is know changing probably due to all the info on the internet and the increased popularity of espresso.

I think there is still a lot to be improved / R&D'd both on grinders and espresso. Also the prices, especially for grinders, seem way too high for such a device. Let's hope more Chinese will start drinking espresso and then producing the gear.... :)

I mean, anno 2007 it should be possible to develop a grinder without the issues commonly mentioned for a reasonable price.....

@jesawdy:
Thanks for the info on the single / three phase issue !
Matthew
 
Posts: 15
Joined: May 07, 2007
Location: The Netherlands (Europe)

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Teme on Fri May 25, 2007 2:10 am

Matthew wrote:Well I'm pretty sure that it comes in a manual version since the Macap site says so.

Yes, Macap says (I called them when I was researching) that they usually build in the automatic version, but it can also be had as a manual. However, most of the retailers I contacted say that it is only available as an automatic (even after I pointed out that Macap themselves say different). Hence the confusion and the need to make absolutely sure what you'll actually be buying if you go for the Macap.

Matthew wrote:And then there's the budget, assuming that Teme's EUR 1500,- is on the spot.

Where does this number come from? It's the same price as the Kony.

Br,
Teme
User avatar
Teme
 
Posts: 305
Joined: May 07, 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Matthew on Fri May 25, 2007 12:39 pm

Teme wrote:Where does this number come from? It's the same price as the Kony.

Br,
Teme

Not sure if I understand you. You said a few posts above this one that a M3 would cost around EUR 1500,= to import to Europe incl. tax etc. I can get a Kony for EUR 1050,= so thats almost EUR 500,- difference.....!
Matthew
 
Posts: 15
Joined: May 07, 2007
Location: The Netherlands (Europe)

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Teme on Fri May 25, 2007 12:47 pm

Matthew wrote:Not sure if I understand you. You said a few posts above this one that a M3 would cost around EUR 1500,= to import to Europe incl. tax etc. I can get a Kony for EUR 1050,= so thats almost EUR 500,- difference.....!

Yes, the M3 is around 1500 euros when imported to Europe, but from your post it appears that you are referring to the K10 WBC when mentioning that price. That made me wonder if I was not clear.

Br,
Teme
User avatar
Teme
 
Posts: 305
Joined: May 07, 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Love my Macap M7K

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by JimWright on Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:22 am

How odd. In the U.S., the M7K models being sold at Chris' Coffee Service are manual and only $1000 US, even after costs of import! I love mine, half the price of the Kony here and produces better shots than I can get at almost any cafe in LA...
JimWright
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Dec 31, 2006
Location: Foster City, CA

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Rainman on Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:14 am

JimWright wrote:How odd. In the U.S., the M7K models being sold at Chris' Coffee Service are manual and only $1000 US, even after costs of import! I love mine, half the price of the Kony here and produces better shots than I can get at almost any cafe in LA...


Not quite- my Kony came via EPNW, and cost ~$1500 USD after taxes, shipping, etc... I've got to say, if a tornado ever blows through Tucson and knocks my house down, one of the few things left standing will likely be this grinder! Too bad it doesn't come in the interesting colors that the Macaps do-- the clash is starting to get to me :roll:
LMWDP #18
Rainman
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
Location: Tucson

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by zix on Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:55 pm

For all of us looking at this thread (and other similar ones too) in the hope of finding something really good with conical burrs for home use... I'd like to say it is very plain that we are simply not quite there yet. There is still that big gap - actually "black hole" would be a better expression - in the market which the M3 could have filled, if the price was better. The general design ideas with low RPM, sturdy build, belt drive and straight grind path are really good, I think, it only needs to be a little bit more convenient (I mean the part with having to fill the grinder manually while you are grinding, of course). Some kind of timer or other dosage help, conical or hybrid burrs, preferrably a tunable motor speed... would it really be impossible to make such a home grinder for around 400-500 dollars?
Well... the Behmor roaster got built, it seems, so maybe miracles may still happen on the grinder front too.

/zix
- who is making little both-feet-together jumps every day to see further, when looking out over the north sea for the Behmor Roaster Boat...
LMWDP #047
User avatar
zix
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Location: Sweden

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Rainman on Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:50 am

zix wrote:For all of us looking at this thread (and other similar ones too) in the hope of finding something really good with conical burrs for home use... I'd like to say it is very plain that we are simply not quite there yet. There is still that big gap - actually "black hole" would be a better expression - in the market which the M3 could have filled, if the price was better. The general design ideas with low RPM, sturdy build, belt drive and straight grind path are really good, I think, it only needs to be a little bit more convenient (I mean the part with having to fill the grinder manually while you are grinding, of course). Some kind of timer or other dosage help, conical or hybrid burrs, preferrably a tunable motor speed... would it really be impossible to make such a home grinder for around 400-500 dollars?
Well... the Behmor roaster got built, it seems, so maybe miracles may still happen on the grinder front too.

/zix
- who is making little both-feet-together jumps every day to see further, when looking out over the north sea for the Behmor Roaster Boat...


I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a $400-500 conical grinder to show up. But for now, it doesn't seem manufacturers have all that much interest to hurry up and create it. I'm sure they've done some sort of market analysis to see if the demand is there (although the price might be a bit higher, because it'll probably compete w/ the Mazzer mini-e's). If I had the opportunity to buy all over again, I might have gone for the M3. At the moment, though, I was concerned with something that I thought would last forever (hey, I want something for my money!

Just remember how long Joe's been working on his Behmor, and LM on the GS3, and apply that to the home version of a conical burr grinder. Apples and oranges, I know, but there are some similarities. Making espresso at home is such a new phenomenon (not to mention the rapid evolution in grinder technology), I'm sure some of that at least partially explains the lag.

Ray
LMWDP #18
Rainman
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
Location: Tucson

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by zix on Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:59 pm

Maybe I am less hopeful than you, Rainman! Let's hope your visions are the right ones. Looking at the giant steps Joe B has had to take to create his roaster, from nothing, as it were, to the thought-through product it is today, well... I admire that, very much. Of course it would be a pleasant surprise so see such devotion from one of the existing grinder manufacturers, but somehow I find it hard to imagine that, say, Mazzer or Macap would eventually show up with something like a smarter and (somewhat) cheaper M3. Versalab probably could do it, if they wanted.
It is perhaps a wee bit strange that the DIY market for espresso stuff doesn't exist, the way it does in home audio. At least not yet... or does it? A DIY grinder kit would be the perfect product to start with, much much easier than a roaster or an espresso machine.
LMWDP #047
User avatar
zix
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Location: Sweden
www.espressocare.com: expert repairs with an italian touch
www.espressocare.com: expert repairs with an italian touch

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by cannonfodder on Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:03 pm

To the OP, keep an eye on the Titan Grinder Project. We have both the MXK and Kony to be reviewed, along with a Cimbali Max, Robur, and Super Jolly. Some interesting initial results.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3898
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by MellowCat on Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:26 pm

cannonfodder wrote:To the OP, keep an eye on the Titan Grinder Project. We have both the MXK and Kony to be reviewed, along with a Cimbali Max, Robur, and Super Jolly. Some interesting initial results.


Are the Compak grinders mentioned previously in this thread not available/comparable for the project?
MellowCat
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Nov 07, 2006
Location: Toronto/London, UK

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by Ko on Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:03 pm

cannonfodder wrote:To the OP, keep an eye on the Titan Grinder Project. We have both the MXK and Kony to be reviewed, along with a Cimbali Max, Robur, and Super Jolly. Some interesting initial results.


Looking forward to the review, especially the Super Jolly vs Robur.


MellowCat wrote:Are the Compak grinders mentioned previously in this thread not available/comparable for the project?


I guess Compak is out for not being readily available in the US and not carried by the main project sponser.
Ko
 
Posts: 37
Joined: May 30, 2006
Location: Bangkok, THAILAND

Link to "Macap MXK or Mazzer Kony?"by cannonfodder on Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:14 pm

We had discussed tossing the Compak in the mix but as you suggest, not having a US distributor makes it more difficult to get. We have 5 grinders that represent a nice cross section of the market. We were offered more grinders, but in the interest of not overcomplicating, or overworking the testers, we kept to this list. We already have several months of work with just these grinders not to mention the shipping and coffee cost.

As to the Robur vs Super Jolly, you will just have to read the bench thread. :twisted:
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3898
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Previous

Return to Espresso Grinders