HB wrote:For the record, I believe the WDT is a miracle worker for grinders that produce lots of clumps. But I did learn from this session that a well practiced Stockfleths Move is less labor intensive and the results are very close, in appearance and most importantly, in taste.
FWIW, most of the grinders that we tested in the WBC machine testing week in Vancouver last January were electronic dosing designs. Most produced grinds with some level of particle aggregates (we don't use the word clumping). Particle aggregates were not necessarily viewed as problematic by the pro community. Four teams of three evaluators per team performed independent evaluations of the grinders. The members of our team used Stockfleths distribution scheme and had no problems with particle aggregates at all. Our evaluation team was more concerned with the results in the cup than the appearance of the grinds out of the chute.
-Greg
